RESUMO
This study was conducted to assess the utility of unbound brain EC50 (EC50,u) as a measure of in vivo potency for centrally active drugs. Seven mu-opioid agonists (alfentanil, fentanyl, loperamide, methadone, meperidine, morphine, and sufentanil) were selected as model central nervous system drugs because they elicit a readily measurable central effect (antinociception) and their clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics are well understood. Mice received an equipotent subcutaneous dose of one of the model opioids. The time course of antinociception and the serum and brain concentrations were determined. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was used to estimate relevant parameters. In vitro measures of opioid binding affinity (Ki) and functional activity [EC50 for agonist stimulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding] and relevant clinical parameters were obtained to construct in vitro-to-preclinical and preclinical-to-clinical correlations. The strongest in vitro-to-in vivo correlation was observed between Ki and unbound brain EC50,u (r2 approximately 0.8). A strong correlation between mouse serum and human plasma EC50 was observed (r2 = 0.949); the correlation was improved when corrected for protein binding (r2 = 0.995). Clinical equipotent i.v. dose was only moderately related to Ki. However, estimates of ED50 and EC50 (total serum, unbound serum, total brain, and unbound brain) were significant predictors of clinical equipotent i.v. dose; the best correlation was observed for brain EC50,u (r2 = 0.982). For each opioid, brain equilibration half-life in mice was almost identical to the plasma effect-site equilibration half-life measured clinically. These results indicate that the mouse is a good model for opioid human brain disposition and clinical pharmacology and that superior in vitro-to-preclinical and preclinical-to-clinical correlations can be achieved with relevant unbound concentrations.
Assuntos
Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/biossíntese , Transportadores de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/biossíntese , Analgésicos Opioides , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Modelos Biológicos , Receptores Opioides mu/agonistas , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Animais , Barreira Hematoencefálica/metabolismo , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Guanosina 5'-O-(3-Tiotrifosfato)/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ligação Proteica , Ensaio RadioliganteRESUMO
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A have considerable overlap in inducers in vitro. Characterizing P-gp induction in vivo and potential coregulation with CYP3A are important goals for predicting drug interactions. This study examined P-gp expression in mouse tissues and potential coinduction with CYP3A following oral treatment with 1 of 7 prototypical inducing agents for 5 days. P-gp expression in brain or liver was not induced by any treatment as determined by Western blot, whereas dexamethasone, pregnenolone-16alpha-carbonitrile (PCN), St. John's wort (SJW), and rifampin induced hepatic CYP3A expression. In intestine, rifampin and SJW induced P-gp expression 3.7- and 1.6-fold and CYP3A 3.5- and 2.4-fold, respectively, whereas dexamethasone and PCN induced CYP3A only. These observations suggest that P-gp in mouse small intestine is inducible by some, but not all, CYP3A inducers, whereas P-gp expression in liver or brain is not readily induced. Intriguingly, rifampin and SJW, both activators of the human pregnane X receptor (PXR), induced CYP3A in both liver and intestine but induced P-gp only in intestine, whereas PCN, an activator of murine PXR, did not induce P-gp in any tissue. Rifampin disposition was evaluated, and hepatic exposure to rifampin was comparable to intestine; in contrast, brain concentrations were low. Overall, these observations demonstrate that P-gp induction in vivo is tissue-specific; furthermore, there is a disconnect between P-gp induction and CYP3A induction that is tissue- and inducer-dependent, suggesting that PXR activation alone is insufficient for P-gp induction in vivo. Tissue-specific factors and inducer pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties may underlie these observations.