Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 33(3): 267-274, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35753901

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Publication and peer review are fundamental to career advancement in science and academic medicine. Studies demonstrate that women are underrepresented in science publishing. We evaluated the gender distribution of contributors to Wilderness & Environmental Medicine (WEM) from 2010 through 2019. METHODS: We extracted author data from ScienceDirect, reviewer data from the WEM Editorial Manager database, and editorial board data from journal records. Gender (female and male) was classified using automated probability-based assessment with Genderize.io software. RESULTS: A total of 2297 unique authors were published over the 10-y span, generating 3613 authorships, of which gender was classified for 96% (n=3480). Women represented 26% (n=572) of all authors, which breaks down to 22% of all, 19% of first, 28% of second, and 18% of last authorships. Women represented 20% of peer reviewers (508/2517), 20% of reviewers-in-training (19/72), and 16% of editorial board members (7/45). The proportion of female authors, first authors, and reviewers increased over time. Women received fewer invitations per reviewer than men (mean 2.1 [95% CI 2.0-2.3] vs 2.4 [95% CI 2.3-2.5]; P=0.004), accepted reviews at similar rates (mean 73 vs 71%; P=0.214), and returned reviews 1.4 d later (mean 10.4 [CI 9.5-11.3] vs 9.0 d [95% CI 8.5-9.6]; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: While female representation increased over the study period, women comprise a minority of WEM authors, peer reviewers, and editorial board members. Gender equity could be improved by identifying and eliminating barriers to participation, addressing any potential bias in review processes, implementing strategies to increase female-authored submissions, and increasing mentorship and training.


Assuntos
Medicina Ambiental , Medicina Selvagem , Autoria , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Revisão por Pares
2.
Diving Hyperb Med ; 51(3): 256-263, 2021 Sep 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547776

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is available to a wide spectrum of patients, many with significant co-morbidities. Considering its effects on cardiac physiology and reports of pulmonary oedema following exposure, concerns exist about the safety of patients with compromised cardiac function. Few studies have described adverse events occurring during HBOT and even fewer reports address events arising in the hours following HBOT. A relation between adverse events and cardiac function has not been established. As medical guidance is limited, we aimed to evaluate the risk for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) receiving HBOT. METHODS: This retrospective chart review of patients receiving HBOT from April 2003 through December 2019 at our hospital was designed to describe clinical characteristics of patients and to identify adverse events during HBOT and within 24 hours after HBOT. Patients ≥ 40 years of age with a documented LVEF of ≤ 40% were included. Data are presented as mean (SD) [range] or counts, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included in the final analysis, 2 (1) [0-4] patients per year. Patients received 25 (19) [1-60] treatments. Two patients had an episode of acute decompensated heart failure possibly linked to HBOT. CONCLUSIONS: This study described the clinical characteristics of patients with reduced LVEF receiving HBOT and showed reassuring results, with a majority of patients with reduced LVEF tolerating HBOT well. Prospective research is required to more fully assess the risk.


Assuntos
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Humanos , Oxigênio , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda
6.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 28(3): 167, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28755821
7.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 35(2): 301-319, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28411929

RESUMO

Decompression sickness and arterial gas embolism, collectively known as decompression illness (DCI), are rare but serious afflictions that can result from compressed gas diving exposures. Risk is primarily determined by the pressure-time profile but is influenced by several factors. DCI can present idiosyncratically but with a wide range of neurologic symptoms. Examination is critical for assessment in the absence of diagnostic indicators. Many conditions must be considered in the differential diagnosis. High-fraction oxygen breathing provides first aid but definitive treatment of DCI is hyperbaric oxygen.


Assuntos
Doença da Descompressão/terapia , Mergulho/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Doença da Descompressão/diagnóstico , Doença da Descompressão/fisiopatologia , Embolia Aérea/fisiopatologia , Embolia Aérea/terapia , Primeiros Socorros/métodos , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Exame Físico/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA