Comparison of Four Dual-Energy CT Scanner Technologies for Determining Renal Stone Composition: A Phantom Approach.

Background Studies have investigated the value of various dual-energy CT (DECT) technologies for determining renal stone composition. However, sparse multivendor comparison data exist. Purpose To compare the performance of four DECT technologies in determining renal stone composition at standard- and low-dose acquisitions. Materials and Methods This was an in vitro phantom study. Seventy-one urinary stones (size: 2.7-14.1 mm) of known chemical composition (51 calcium, four struvite, four cystine, and 12 urate) were placed in a custom-made cylindrical phantom. Consecutive scans with manufacturer-recommended protocols and dose-optimized institutional protocols (up to 80% reduction in volumetric CT dose index) were obtained with rapid kilovolt peak switching DECT (rsDECT) (n = 2), dual-source DECT (n = 2), twin-beam DECT (tbDECT) (n = 1), and dual-layer detector-based CT (dlDECT) (n = 1) scanners. The image data sets were analyzed using effective atomic number and dual-energy ratio indexes of maximally available and comparable spectra. The performance of each combination of scanner technology, method, and acquisition was assessed. Logistic regression models were used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results After image analysis, all scanners except tbDECT had an AUC greater than 0.95 in at least one acquisition in distinguishing urate from other stones. All DECT techniques were able to help differentiate calcium oxalate monohydrate stones with moderate accuracy (AUC: 0.70-0.83), and brushite was differentiated from urate with AUC greater than 0.99. There was no correlation between performance and acquisition with dose-optimized and/or vendor-recommended settings. Conclusion All four dual-energy CT (DECT) technologies enabled accurate determination of stone composition at standard- and low-dose acquisitions; however, performance varied based on the scanner parameters, DECT technique, and stone type. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ringl and Apfaltrer in this issue.

Evaluation of phytochemicals, antioxidant and burn wound healing activities of Cucurbita moschata Duchesne fruit peel.

OBJECTIVES: Cucurbita moschata Duchesne (pumpkin) is a well-known plant with several pharmacological effects. The aim of the present study was to assess burn wound healing activity of C. moschata peel extract (CE). Also, standardized CE was assessed for antioxidant activity and antibacterial effects against major pathogens of burns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healing properties of topical preparation of 10% and 20% concentrations of CE were assessed on second degree burn in rats during a 14-day period as well as histological studies, total antioxidant power, lipid peroxidation and total thiol content of skin tissue samples. RESULTS: Radical scavenging IC50 and ferric-reducing antioxidant power value were 4.015±0.20 mg/ml and 142.63±2.65 mmol Fe2+/g, respectively. Total mucilage content was 13.8%. The optimal results were obtained by 20% CE that showed 90.80±5.86 % wound closure and tissue repair as well as significant reduction of tissue oxidative stress biomarkers. Histological analyses confirmed wound healing activity of pumpkin peel extract. CONCLUSION: Considering the high mucilage content of the plant, providing a moist environment for wound, C. moschata peel extract could be a natural remedy for treatment of burns. Further clinical studies are suggested to confirm C. moschata peel extract as a wound healing agent.