Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions.

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus may be caused by a lesion or dysfunction at any level of the auditory system. This study explores cochlear mechanics using otoacoustic emissions in patients with tinnitus after head injury, in whom there seems to be evidence to support dysfunction within the CNS. METHODS: The study included 20 patients with tinnitus and other auditory symptoms, such as hyperacusis and difficulty in listening in background noise, after head injury, in the presence of an "intact" auditory periphery (normal or near normal audiometric thresholds). They were compared with 20 normal subjects and 12 subjects with head injury, but without tinnitus, who had similar audiometric thresholds. In all subjects otoacoustic emissions, including transient click-evoked (TEOAEs) and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), were recorded, and a test of efferent medial olivocochlear suppression, consisting of recording of TEOAEs under contralateral stimulation, was performed. RESULTS: A significantly higher prevalence of SOAEs (100%), higher TEOAE response amplitudes, and reduced medial olivocochlear suppression in patients with tinnitus in comparison with subjects without tinnitus have been found. CONCLUSION: These findings have been interpreted to be an extracochlear phenomenon, in which the reduction in central efferent suppression of cochlear mechanics, leading to an increase in cochlear amplifier gain, was subsequent to head injury. Auditory symptoms in these patients seemed to constitute the "disinhibition syndrome".

Mechanisms of hearing loss in acoustic neuroma: an otoacoustic emission study.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) are active mechanical responses from the cochlea which provide information about the integrity of the preneural cochlear receptor mechanisms. It may be hypothesised, therefore, that if a hearing impairment is neural in origin, normal EOAEs may be obtained from the cochlea, which, although dissociated, is functioning normally. This study examined the status of the cochlea with EOAE in patients with cochlear (Meniere's disease) and neural (surgically proven acoustic neuroma) disease. In patients with presumed cochlear lesions, no emissions were present with mean hearing worse than 40 dB across a frequency range of 0.5 to 4 kHz. Similarly, an EOAE was not present in any of the 26 acoustic neuroma patients studied when the average (0.5 to 4 kHz) hearing was greater than 40 dB. We conclude that dissociation of the cochlea in patients with acoustic neuroma appears to be rare and, in fact, cochlear involvement occurs in most cases. Possible mechanisms responsible for the effect on the cochlea in this group include degenerative changes due to chronic partial obstruction of the blood supply by the tumour, biochemical alterations in the inner ear fluids, loss of efferent control of active mechanical tuning, and hair cell degeneration secondary to neuronal loss in the eighth nerve.

Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.

The effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were examined in three subject groups in order that the impact of efferent olivocochlear bundle section (as a consequence of vestibular neurectomy) could be compared with normal findings, and with a control surgical population. Results demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of contralateral noise on OAE amplitude was absent from the cochlea with severed efferent fibers. These findings appear to be independent of acoustic reflex activity, as suppression was absent despite normal reflexes. Inter-aural suppression of emissions recorded from the patients' intact cochleae act as a control and show a clear reduction in amplitude during contralateral stimulation in a frequency specific pattern consistent with normal findings. Patients who had undergone a similar surgical approach for vascular decompression of the VIIIth nerve without vestibular nerve section, were studied in order to assess the impact of retrolabyrinthine surgery on inter-aural suppression. Inhibition of OAE amplitude was maintained in all control cases in both the operated and intact sides, and was consistent with suppression observed in normal subjects, suggesting that the surgical procedures had not disturbed inter-aural suppression of otoacoustic emissions. It is concluded that the olivocochlear efferent system, when activated by low level contralateral acoustic stimulation, has an inhibitory role in controlling the cellular mechanisms responsible for the generation of otoacoustic emissions in humans. OAE techniques in conjunction with contralateral acoustic stimulation may thus prove to be of value in providing a rapid and non-invasive clinical test of efferent function and offer a means of investigating the functional significance of the efferent auditory system in humans.

Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions following vestibular neurectomy.

This study demonstrates that, following unilateral vestibular neurectomy, the inhibitory effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions is absent. The patient acts as her own control in that the unoperated side shows normal suppression of otoacoustic emission amplitude with contralateral acoustic stimulation. The lack of interaural suppression of otoacoustic emissions on the sectioned side, in the presence of normal acoustic reflex threshold levels, provides evidence that observed phenomena are not merely a function of middle ear reflex activity. It is concluded that the lack of inhibition in the operated ear is due to the sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle within the inferior vestibular nerve, removing the efferent control of the receptor cells. Otoacoustic emissions recorded during contralateral acoustic stimulation may thus provide a rapid, non-invasive means of investigating the functional of the efferent auditory system.

Binaural voltage summation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials: an adjunct to the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.

Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) amplitude is modified according to whether or not the stimulus is applied monaurally or binaurally. In normal subjects, wave V amplitude increases by an average of 68.7% upon changing stimulation from monaural to binaural. From earlier studies there is evidence that brainstem potential amplitude is reduced in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) but none to suggest that binaural stimulation results in increased amplitude. This study evaluated the extent of binaural summation of BAEPs in patients with MS. In a large majority of patients with MS who have no hearing deficit, BAEPs showed no increase in wave V amplitude on binaural stimulation. This finding is in contrast to the normal group and thus has diagnostic importance. Measurements of binaural summation therefore might usefully be applied to the clinical assessment of disease progression, or lack of it, in individual patients.