RESUMO
Whereas benign pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are often successfully cured by surgical resection, treatment of metastatic disease can be challenging in terms of both disease control and symptom control. Fortunately, several options are available, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical debulking. Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and somatostatin receptor imaging have laid the groundwork for use of these radiopharmaceuticals as theranostic agents. 131I-MIBG therapy of neuroendocrine tumors has a long history, and the recent approval of high-specific-activity 131I-MIBG for metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has resulted in general availability of, and renewed interest in, this treatment. Although reports of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with 90Y- or 177Lu-DOTA conjugated somatostatin analogs have appeared in the literature, the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE in the United States and Europe, together with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggesting its use in patients with metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, has resulted in renewed interest. These agents have shown evidence of efficacy as palliative treatments in patients with metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. In this continuing medical education article, we discuss the therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with 131I-MIBG and 90Y- or 177Lu-DOTA-somatostatin analogs.
Assuntos
Paraganglioma , Feocromocitoma , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , CintilografiaRESUMO
Targeted radionuclide therapies (TRT) using 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (177Lu or 90Y) represent several of the therapeutic options in the management of metastatic/inoperable pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Recently, high-specific-activity-131I-MIBG therapy was approved by the FDA and both 177Lu-DOTATATE and 131I-MIBG therapy were recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the treatment of metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. However, a clinical dilemma often arises in the selection of TRT, especially when a patient can be treated with either type of therapy based on eligibility by MIBG and somatostatin receptor imaging. To address this problem, we assembled a group of international experts, including oncologists, endocrinologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, with substantial experience in treating neuroendocrine tumors with TRTs to develop consensus and provide expert recommendations and perspectives on how to select between these two therapeutic options for metastatic/inoperable pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. This article aims to summarize the survival outcomes of the available TRTs; discuss personalized treatment strategies based on functional imaging scans; address practical issues, including regulatory approvals; and compare toxicities and risk factors across treatments. Furthermore, it discusses the emerging TRTs.
Assuntos
3-Iodobenzilguanidina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/radioterapia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/secundário , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Lutécio/uso terapêutico , Octreotida/análogos & derivados , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Paraganglioma/radioterapia , Paraganglioma/secundário , Feocromocitoma/radioterapia , Feocromocitoma/secundário , Radioisótopos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Radioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Octreotida/uso terapêutico , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia ComputadorizadaRESUMO
Differentiated thyroid cancers are typically iodine-avid and can be effectively treated with radioiodine. In most patients, radioiodine treatment is done for ablation of residual tissue, and in these cases the focus should be on using the minimum effective dose. Adjuvant therapy can be done to reduce the risk of recurrence, but optimal patient selection and dose are unclear. Patients with advanced disease benefit most from treatment with the maximum-tolerated dose. Recent research has focused on better patient selection and reduced radioiodine doses for remnant ablation. There are emerging targeted therapeutic approaches in patients who are appropriately shown to have iodine-refractory disease, with 1 drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Numerous trials are ongoing to assess targeted therapeutics alone or in combination with radioiodine.
Assuntos
Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/radioterapia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Humanized A33 (huA33) is a promising monoclonal antibody that recognizes A33 antigen, which is present in more than 95% of colorectal cancers and in normal bowel. In this study, we took advantage of quantitative PET to evaluate (124)I huA33 targeting, biodistribution, and safety in patients with colorectal cancer. We also determined the biodistribution of (124)I-huA33 when a large dose of human intravenous IgG (IVIG) was administered to manipulate the Fc receptor or when (124)I-huA33 was given via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). METHODS: We studied 25 patients with primary or metastatic colorectal cancer; 19 patients had surgical exploration or resection. Patients received a median of 343 MBq (44.4-396 MBq) and 10 mg of (124)I-huA33. Nineteen patients received the antibody intravenously and 6 patients via HAI, and 5 patients also received IVIG. RESULTS: Ten of 12 primary tumors were visualized in 11 patients. The median concentration in primary colon tumors was 0.016% injected dose per gram, compared with 0.004% in normal colon. The PET-based median ratio of hepatic tumor uptake to normal-liver uptake was 3.9 (range, 1.8-22.2). Quantitation using PET, compared with well counting of serum and tissue, showed little difference. Prominent uptake in bowel hindered tumor identification in some patients. Pharmacokinetics showed that patients receiving IVIG had a significantly shorter serum half-time (41.6 ± 14.0 h) than those without (65.2 ± 9.8 h). There were no differences in clearance rates among the intravenous group, IVIG group, and HAI group, nor was there any difference in serum area under the curve, maximum serum concentration, or volume of distribution. Weak titers of human-antihuman antibodies were observed in 6 of 25 patients. No acute side effects or significant toxicities were associated with huA33. CONCLUSION: Good localization of (124)I-huA33 in colorectal cancer with no significant toxicity has been observed. PET-derived (124)I concentrations agreed well with those obtained by well counting of surgically resected tissue and blood, confirming the quantitative accuracy of (124)I-huA33 PET. The HAI route had no advantage over the intravenous route. No clinically significant changes in blood clearance were induced by IVIG.