Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Transl Endocrinol ; 20: 100223, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32257821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether estrogen supplementation primarily from oral contraceptive pills compared to no estrogen supplementation is associated with differences in mean bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA in a cross-sectional study of women with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of women with CF followed at a single center, we analyzed 49 women with CF ages 18-50 years with a documented DXA. BMD of women with CF taking estrogen supplementation was compared to BMD of women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. RESULTS: Twelve women with CF were taking estrogen supplementation with mean dose of 23.3 mcg/day (SD 6.9 mcg/day) of ethinyl estradiol. There were no statistically significant differences between demographics of the 12 women with CF taking estrogen supplementation compared to the 37 women with CF not taking estrogen supplementation. Women taking estrogen had lower mean lumbar spine Z-score: -0.7 ± 0.7, compared to women not taking estrogen, Z-score: -0.04 ± 1.0 (p-value 0.046). Women taking estrogen had lower mean BMD at the lumbar spine: 0.952 ± 0.086 g/cm2, compared to women not taking estrogen: 1.023 ± 0.105 g/cm2 (p-value 0.038). Similar trends were seen at the total hip and femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Low-dose estrogen supplementation in premenopausal women with CF was associated with lower BMD compared to no estrogen supplementation in a similar group of premenopausal young women with CF. Future studies are needed to investigate the optimal formulation, route of administration, and dose to accrue and preserve bone mass in premenopausal women with CF.

2.
J Adolesc Health ; 52(5): 592-8, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23608721

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The most safe and effective dose of vitamin D supplementation for healthy adolescents is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 200 IU versus 1,000 IU of daily vitamin D3 for supplementation in healthy adolescents with baseline vitamin D sufficiency. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Fifty-six subjects, ages 11-19 years, with baseline vitamin D sufficiency received 1,000 IU or 200 IU of daily vitamin D3 for 11 weeks. Compliance was assessed using MEMS6 Trackcaps and pill counts. RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects completed the clinical trial. Subjects in the two treatment arms were similar in terms of age, race, gender, body mass index, and dietary calcium and vitamin D intake. Serum 25(OH)D level in the 200 IU treatment arm was 28.1 ± 6.2 ng/mL at baseline (mean ± SD) and 28.9 ± 7.0 ng/mL at follow-up. In the 1,000 IU treatment arm, 25(OH)D levels were 29.0 ± 7.3 and 30.1 ± 6.6 at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Mean change in 25(OH)D level did not differ significantly between treatment arms (p = .87), nor did mean change in parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphate, bone turnover markers, fasting glucose, or fasting insulin. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adolescents with baseline vitamin D sufficiency, supplementation with vitamin D3 doses of 200 and 1,000 IU for 11 weeks did not increase serum 25(OH)D levels, with no significant difference observed between treatment arms.


Assuntos
Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Boston , Criança , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA