Cervical cancer in older women: Does age matter?

OBJECTIVES: Cervical cancer is frequently diagnosed in older women, but few studies have focused on cervical cancer in this specific population. The objectives of this study were to provide an overview of the demographic profile and therapeutic care of women with cervical cancer, and to identify whether age is a prognostic factor. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study from a gynecological cancer registry in a French Regional University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center. 292 women diagnosed with cervical cancer between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, were included. They were classified into younger women (YW), that is, under 70 years of age (N = 228), and older women (OW), that is, aged 70 years or more (N = 64). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were developed to assess the impact of age on OS. RESULTS: Compared with YW, larger proportions of OW had comorbidities (14% vs 7% with a score ≥ 2 on the Charlson Comorbidity Index, P <0.001) and more advanced tumors (37.3% vs 19.7% with FIGO IV, P <0.001); the OW group had a lower treatment rate (81.3% vs 95.6%, P <0.001), and a smaller proportion had undergone surgery (37.5% vs 81.7%, P<.001) but a larger proportion had radiotherapy (67.2% vs 49.6%, P = .01). One-year, 5-year and 10-year OS rates were: 91.6%, 74.1% and 63.9% for YW, and 69.9%, 36.4% and 12.3% for OW, respectively (P <0.001). The hazard ratio for death was twice as high in OW compared with YW with cervical cancer (HR = 2.19 [1.41 - 3.40], P <0.001), independently of FIGO stage, histology, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for cervical cancer depends on age. Screening with the G8 tool followed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment could lead to more suitable treatment being offered to older patients.

Factors Determining the Choice of a Career in Geriatrics among Students in Geriatric in-Hospital Training: A Prospective Study of 74 Medical Students.

To understand why students in the 2nd cycle of medical studies choose to complete a Diploma of Specialized Studies (DSS) in geriatrics, we conducted a study to identify the factors influencing the choice of a future specialty. In addition, we assessed the impact of clinical in-hospital training (CIHT) in a geriatric hospital on the students' selection of their future specialty. We included all students who completed CIHT in the geriatric facility of our University Hospital between 1 May and 31 October 2018. Data were collected using a two-part questionnaire: one part was given before CIHT and the other after. The students were classified into two groups: those considering a career in geriatrics (CIG) before CIHT, forming the group DSS geriatrics+ (GDSSG+), and those not considering it, constituting the group DSS geriatrics- (GDSSG-). Seventy-four students aged 22 years old were included. Of these students, 26% were considering a CIG before CIHT. This rate increased significantly to 42% after CIHT (p = 0.04). However, none of the students who indicated that they were potentially interested in pursuing geriatrics before CIHT preselected geriatrics as their first option. For more than 92% of the students, the comprehensive care of geriatric patients was an asset. The main drawbacks were diagnostic and therapeutic limitations (60% of students), then managing aging, disability, and neurocognitive disorders (55% of students). After CIHT, the view of geriatrics improved by 74%. In conclusion, geriatric CIHT improves students' opinions of geriatrics and increases the number of students considering a CIG. However, geriatrics still suffers from a lack of prestige.

The prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: An observational study of 19 798 Ambulatory subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed to elderly people, but the epidemiologic data for this population remains scarce. We compared the elderly population taking DOACs and those not taking DOACs (noDOAC). METHOD: We included individuals over 75 years old, affiliated to Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy (a French regional health insurance agency), who had been refunded for a prescribed DOAC between 1st and 30th September 2017. The DAOC group (DAOCG) and noDOAC group (noDOACG) were compared in terms of demographic conditions, registered chronic diseases (RCD), and number and types of prescribed drugs. In the DOACG, we compared the type of prescribing physician and laboratory monitoring for novel prescriptions (initial) and prescription refills (≥ 3 months). RESULTS: Of the 19 798 included patients, 1518 (7.7%) were prescribed DAOCs and 18 280 (92.3%) were not. Mean and median age was 85 years in the 2 groups (DOACG and noDOACG). In the DOACG, there were more men (50% vs 40.2%), more RCD (88.9% vs 68.7%) and more drugs per prescription (6 ± 2.8 vs 5 ± 2.9) (All P < .01). The DOACG also took more antihypertensive drugs. The most commonly prescribed DOACs were apixaban (42.9%) followed by rivaroxaban (38.4%) and dabigatran (18.6%). Complete blood count, serum creatinine and coagulation function tests were requested for 69.4%, 75% and 22.2%, respectively, of patients prescribed DAOCs. CONCLUSIONS: The DOACG had more RCD and drugs per prescription than the noDOACG; routine laboratory monitoring was insufficient. What's known Platelet aggregation inhibitors (low-dose) are recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients suffering from symptomatic atherosclerosis. The main risk of this treatment is bleeding. What's new A prescription for platelet aggregation inhibitors was found in 34% of geriatric inpatients in this prospective study. Compliance to guidelines was better for symptomatic peripheral artery disease than for primary prevention in accordance with recent publications. Geriatric comorbidities had no impact on the prescription of platelet aggregation inhibitors. Underuse of platelet aggregation inhibitors was observed in 11.3% of cases and overuse in 13.7% of cases.

Evolving epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a two-year observational study.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for empirical antimicrobial therapy in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are based on quite old trials. Since microbial epidemiology and the management of patients have changed, whether these recommendations are still appropriate must be confirmed. METHODS: An observational study that exhaustively collected the clinical and biological data associated with positive ascitic fluid cultures was conducted in four French university hospitals in 2010-2011. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-eight documented positive cultures were observed in 190 cirrhotic patients (median age 61.5 years, 58.5% Child score C). Of these, 57 were classified as confirmed SBP and 140 as confirmed bacterascites. The predominant flora was Gram-positive cocci, whatever the situation (SBP, bacterascites, nosocomial/health-care related or not). Enteroccocci (27.7% E. faecium) were isolated in 24% of the episodes, and in 48% from patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis. E. coli were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and to third-generation cephalosporins in 62.5% and 89.5% of cases, respectively. No single antibiotic allowed antimicrobial coverage of more than 60%. Only combinations such as amoxicillin + third-generation cephalosporin or cotrimoxazole allowed coverage close to 75-80% in non-nosocomial episodes. Combinations based on broader spectrum antibiotics should be considered for empirical therapy of nosocomial infections. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the changing spectrum of pathogens in SBP and bacterascites, and the need for more complex antibiotic strategies than those previously recommended. Our findings also underline the need for new clinical trials conducted in the current epidemiological context.