Treating opioid dependence with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in Ukraine: Feasibility and three-month outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although opioid agonist treatments (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine are available to treat opioid use disorders (OUD) in Ukraine, OAT acceptability and coverage remains low. Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) that recently became available as another treatment option provides new opportunities for treating OUDs in this region and we aimed to test its feasibility. METHODS: Patients with OUD (N=135) and interested in treatment with XR-NTX were initiated on monthly XR-NTX injections and monitored for three months. Correlates of 3-month retention on XR-NTX and drug use at each time-point using self-reports and urine drug testing (UDT) were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants initiated XR-NTX, 101 (75%) completed three months, defined as 4 consecutive XR-NTX injections. Independent factors negatively associated with retention in XR-NTX treatment included previous maintenance with OAT (aOR=0.3; 95%CI=0.1-0.9) and extrinsic help-seeking treatment motivation (aOR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9). Of these 101 participants completing three months of treatment, opioid use markedly reduced using self-report (67%% to 22%; p>0.001) and UDT (77% to 24%; p<0.001) outcomes over time. Alcohol, marijuana and stimulant use, however, remained unchanged. Craving for opioids and symptoms of depression also significantly decreased, while health-related quality of life scores improved over time. No adverse side effects were reported during the period of observation. CONCLUSION: The first introduction of XR-NTX in Ukraine among persons with OUD resulted in high levels of retention, marked reductions in opioid use and improved quality of life. These descriptive results suggest that XR-NTX treatment is feasible and well-tolerated over a 3-month period in Ukraine.

Primary healthcare-based integrated care with opioid agonist treatment: First experience from Ukraine.

BACKGROUND: Ukraine's HIV epidemic is concentrated among people who inject drugs (PWID), however, coverage with opioid agonist therapies (OATs) available mostly at specialty addiction clinics is extremely low. OAT integrated into primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) provides an opportunity for integrating comprehensive healthcare services and scaling up OAT. METHODS: A pilot study of PHC-based integrated care for drug users conducted in two Ukrainian cities between 2014 and 2016 included three sub-studies: 1) cross-sectional treatment site preference assessment among current OAT patients (N=755); 2) observational cohort of 107 PWID who continued the standard of care versus transition of stabilized and newly enrolled PWID into PHC-based integrated care; and 3) pre/post analysis of attitudes toward PWID and HIV patients by PHC staff (N=26). RESULTS: Among 755 OAT patients, 53.5% preferred receiving OAT at PHCs, which was independently correlated with convenience, trust in physician, and treatment with methadone (vs. buprenorphine). In 107 PWID observed over 6 months, retention in treatment was high: 89% in PWID continuing OAT in specialty addiction treatment settings (standard of care) vs 94% in PWID transitioning to PHCs; and 80% among PWID newly initiating OAT in PHCs. Overall, satisfaction with treatment, subjective self-perception of well-being, and trust in physician significantly increased in patients prescribed OAT in PHCs. Among PHC staff, attitudes towards PWID and HIV patients significantly improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: OAT can be successfully integrated into primary care in low and middle-income countries and improves outcomes in both patients and clinicians while potentially scaling-up OAT for PWID.