Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Are We Failing Latino Patients at a Large Safety Net Hospital?

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) is one recommended option for low-risk prostate cancer and involves close follow-up and monitoring. Our objective was to determine whether non-clinical trial patients adhere to AS protocols and how many are lost to follow-up (LTFU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who initiated AS at Los Angeles County Hospital (LAC) and University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (Norris) between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2015. Competing-risks regression analyses examined the difference in LTFU rates of AS patients in the 2 institutions and examined the association between LTFU and patient characteristics. We used California Cancer Registry data to verify if patients LTFU were monitored and/or treated at other LAC medical facilities. RESULTS: We found 116 patients at LAC and 98 at Norris who met the AS criteria for this study. Patients at LAC and Norris had similar tumor characteristics but differed in median income, race, primary language spoken, distance residing from hospital, and socioeconomic status (SES). LTFU was significantly different between the institutions: 57 ± 7% at LAC and 32 ± 6% at Norris at 5 years (P < .001). By multivariable analysis, the main determinant of LTFU was SES (P = .045). By 5 years, the chance of an LAC patient remaining on AS was 8 ± 6% compared to 20 ± 6% for a Norris patient (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Successful AS implementation relies on patient follow-up. We found that patients on AS from lower SES strata are more often LTFU. Identifying barriers to follow-up and compliance among low SES patients is critical to ensure optimal AS.

Experience with sorafenib and adverse event management.

Sorafenib was the first multikinase inhibitor to be approved for use in renal cell cancer (RCC) in the US (2005) and in Europe (2006). In the Treatment Approaches in Renal Cell Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET), sorafenib showed a significant progression-free survival advantage over placebo in patients with advanced RCC. Incidence rates of adverse events were significantly higher with sorafenib than with placebo. Management of adverse events is an essential component of care to prevent negative impact on patient quality of life and dose modification of sorafenib therapy. This report, based on an expert panel discussion held in February 2009, presents recommendations for the management of skin rash, hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, and hypertension, and strategies to help lessen the frequency and severity of these events. In addition, general recommendations for dose modifications are discussed. The goal of these management recommendations is to optimize sorafenib therapy for advanced RCC.

Expert opinion on the use of first-line sorafenib in selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing globally. Targeted agents offer treatment options that were not available less than a decade ago. However, it is important to carefully select therapy for each individual patient, weighing both the drug efficacy and tolerability profile and patient-related factors, such as adherence, age and comorbidities. Based on our clinical experience in treating patients with renal cell carcinoma, this article offers our opinions on factors that characterize patients for whom sorafenib may serve as a viable first-line therapeutic option.

A phase II study of high-dose calcitriol combined with mitoxantrone and prednisone for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of high-dose calcitriol (DN-101) combined with mitoxantrone and glucocorticoids in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with metastatic AIPC and no previous chemotherapy received DN-101 180 microg orally on day 1 and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 2 every 21 days with continuous daily prednisone 10 mg orally for a maximum of 12 cycles. A confirmed decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels by half was the primary endpoint. QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire, and pain and analgesic use were evaluated. RESULTS: Five of 19 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 9-51) achieved a >/=50% decline in PSA level. The median (95% CI) time to PSA progression was 16 (6-26) weeks. The overall median (95% CI) survival was 16 (6-26) months; 47 (21-73)% of patients achieved an analgesic response. Toxicity was similar to that expected with mitoxantrone and prednisone alone. The QoL analysis suggested a decrease in physical functioning and increase in fatigue, insomnia, and diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: DN-101 given every 3 weeks does not add significant activity to mitoxantrone and prednisone in AIPC, as measured by the PSA decline. The high rate of analgesic response is encouraging. The addition of DN-101 does not appear to increase the toxicity of mitoxantrone.

Glucose and insulin influences on heart and brain in cardiac surgery.

The elective global ischemia of on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery contributes to the incidence of postoperative mortality, complications, and use of resources. In addition to cardiopulmonary bypass and techniques for myocardial protection such as aortic cross clamp, ventricular fibrillation, and cardioplegia, the administration of systemic glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) in the perioperative period may act as both a metabolic modulator and potential inodilator. GIK may therefore serve to protect the myocardium and promote adequate cardiac and hemodynamic performance that would improve patient recovery. Cell, tissue, and animal experiments have determined a number of mechanisms of action by which this may be achieved, with increasing focus on insulin as the key component. The original concepts centered on GIK during or after ischemia switching metabolism away from that based on non-esterified fatty acids toward a more favorable glucose-based metabolism and thus improving the efficiency of adenosine triphosphate production and glycogen preservation. Insulin's ability to reduce intracellular fatty acid metabolism may also reduce cellular membrane damage. More recently other mechanisms have also been suggested, including osmotic, oxygen free radical scavenging, and antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects. However, trials that have examined the role of GIK in cardiac surgery have been small, open label, and involved a wide variety of regimens. They have demonstrated improved glycogen preservation, reduced infarct size, reduced incidences of dysrhythmias, need for inotropic agents, and low cardiac output state, and overall reduced lengths of stay. The perceived need to achieve strict blood glucose control to reduce neurologic injury and improve overall mortality have conflicted with its practical difficulties, particularly during cold cardiopulmonary bypass, and the exact role of supplemental glucose administration and resulting hyperglycemia require re-examination.