Access to and clinical use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2016 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.

AIMS: The aim of this analysis was to provide comprehensive information on the access to and use of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) area. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has been collecting descriptive and quantitative data on invasive arrhythmia therapies since 2008. This year 50 of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book. Up-to-date information on procedure rates for the last 5 years together with information on demographics, economy, vital statistics, local healthcare systems, and training activities is presented for each country and the 5 geographical ESC regions. Our analysis indicated that considerable heterogeneity in the access to arrhythmia therapies still exists across the ESC area. In 2015, the CIED implantation rates per million population were highest in the Western followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The catheter ablation activity was largest in the Western followed by the Northern and Southern areas. Overall, the procedure rates were 3-10 times higher in the European than in the non-European ESC countries. Economic resources were not the only driver for utilization of arrhythmia therapies as in some Eastern European countries with relative low gross domestic product the procedure rates exceeded the average values. CONCLUSION: These data will help the healthcare professionals and stakeholders to identify and to understand in more depth the trends, disparities, and gaps in cardiac arrhythmia care and thereby promote harmonization of cardiac arrhythmias therapies in the ESC area.

Current trends in the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology member countries: 2015 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.

AIMS: The aim was to provide comprehensive information on the use of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) area. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has collected data on use of invasive arrhythmia managements since 2008. Fifty-one of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book 2015. This analysis is based on the current and previous editions of the EHRA White Book. Up-to-date information on procedure rates for the last 5 years together with information on economic resources, reimbursement systems, and training requirements are presented for each country and the five geographical ESC regions. In 2014, the CIED implantation rates per million population were highest in the Western followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The catheter ablation activity was largest in the Western followed by the Northern and Southern areas. Altogether the procedure rates were lowest in the Eastern European and in the non-European ESC countries. In the European ESC countries, the procedure rates were 3-10 times higher than in the non-European ESC countries. However, in some countries with a relatively low gross domestic product the procedure rates exceeded the average values indicating that utilization of arrhythmia therapies was not driven merely by the economic factors. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that considerable heterogeneity in the availability and utilization of arrhythmia therapies still exist across the ESC area. The data will hopefully aid in directing future activities and promote harmonization of cardiac arrhythmia care in the ESC countries.

Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.

AIMS: There has been large variations in the use of invasive electrophysiological therapies in the member countries of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The aim of this analysis was to provide comprehensive information on cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy trends in the ESC countries over the last five years. METHODS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has collected data on CIED and catheter ablation therapy since 2008. Last year 49 of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book. This analysis is based on the current and previous editions of the EHRA White Book. Data on procedure rates together with information on economic aspects, local reimbursement systems and training activities are presented for each ESC country and the five geographical ESC regions. RESULTS: In 2013, the electrophysiological procedure rates per million population were highest in Western Europe followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The CIED implantation and catheter ablation rate was lowest in the Eastern European and in the non-European ESC countries, respectively. However, in some Eastern European countries with relative low gross domestic product procedure rates exceeded those of some wealthier Western countries, suggesting that economic resources are not the only driver for utilization of arrhythmia therapies. CONCLUSION: These statistics indicate that despite significant improvements, there still is considerable heterogeneity in the availability of arrhythmia therapies across the ESC area. Hopefully, these data will help identify areas for improvement and guide future activities in cardiac arrhythmia management.

[New antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation]. / Uudet rytmihäiriölääkkeet eteisvärinän hoidossa.

Pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) is demanding, because currently available antiarrhythmic drugs have low efficacy and many side effects. In drug development, the focus has been on amiodarone-like multichannel blockers, atrial-specific ion channel blockers, and novel non-channel agents targeting atrial remodelling. Dronedarone, an amiodarone analogue without iodine, was recently approved for treatment of AF. It is less effective than amiodarone, but serious adverse events are rare. Vernakalant, an atrial-selective drug with low proarrhythmic risk, is effective in cardioversion and it may also prevent AF recurrences. So-called upstream therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin receptor inhibitors, statins and omega-3 fatty acids needs further clinical validation.

Heart rate turbulence after ventricular and atrial premature beats in subjects without structural heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Studies assessing heart rate (HR) behavior after premature beats have focused on HR responses to ventricular premature beats (VBPs), but there is less information of HR behavior after atrial premature beats (APBs). METHODS AND RESULTS: HR turbulence after VPBs and APBs was first measured in response to ambient APBs and VPBs occurring during 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings in 29 subjects without structural heart disease, and in response to programmed atrial (AE) and ventricular extrastimuli (VE) in 6 subjects undergoing electrophysiologic (EP) examination. Turbulence onset (TO) was more negative (-2.3 +/- 3.2% vs -0.9 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.01) and turbulence slope (TS) was steeper (11 +/- 11 vs 5.1 +/- 4.1 msec/R-R interval, P < 0.05) after VPBs than APBs. Compared to VPBs, the acceleration of HR after APBs was delayed by one beat, and APBs were associated with a short R-R interval preceding the APB, resulting in a blunted TO. Studies of patients undergoing an EP test confirmed the one-beat delay of HR acceleration and the blunted TO after programmed AE compared to VE (P < 0.05). TO and TS after VPBs were related to baroreflex sensitivity. TO also was related to 24-hour standard deviation of N-N intervals (SDNN). However, the TO or TS following APBs was not related to either SDNN or baroreflex sensitivity. CONCLUSION: HR behavior is different in response to APBs and VBPs among subjects without structural heart disease. Different definitions and calculation formulas should be used in the analysis of HR turbulence after APBs and VPBs.

Impaired negative chronotropic response to adenosine in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside that has an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of several cardiac arrhythmias. However, its effects on inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) are not well established. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, the response to intravenous adenosine (0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg) was studied in 18 patients (age 46+/-15 years) with IST. In a subset of patients (n = 5), the direct effects of adenosine were assessed during pharmacologic beta-adrenergic and cholinergic blockade. Atrial cycle length (ACL) was measured before adenosine injection, at the time of the greatest cycle length prolongation, and during the maximum rebound acceleration of heart rate. Eighteen subjects (age 46+/-11 years) with normal sinus rhythm undergoing clinically indicated electrophysiologic study served as controls. Adenosine did not terminate IST in any patient. The maximum dose of adenosine prolonged the sinus interval significantly, from 780+/-128 msec to 985+/-225 msec (P < 0.001) in the control subjects. In contrast, adenosine caused no significant lengthening of atrial cycle length (527+/-69 msec vs 590+/-148 msec; P = NS) in the patients with IST. Similar difference in the response to adenosine was seen during the pharmacologic autonomic blockade. The reflex increase of the sinus rate (rebound effect) was greater in the control subjects than in the patients with IST (21.2%+/-9.7% vs 8.5%+/-8.8%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The usual negative chronotropic effect of adenosine was impaired in the patients with IST. This may have important diagnostic implications and provide new insight into the mechanism(s) of IST.