Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Emotional Distress in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Quality of life of patients with lung cancer can be impaired by psychological distress. This study evaluated prevalence of and risk factors for emotional distress in patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen potential risk factors were retrospectively investigated in 144 patients. Emotional distress was evaluated with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer. Values of p<0.0036 (Bonferroni correction) were considered significant. RESULTS: At least one emotional problem (worry, fear, sadness, depression, nervousness, loss of interest) was reported by the majority of patients (N=93, 65%). Prevalence of these problems was 37%, 38%, 31%, 15%, 32% and 23%, respectively. Physical problems were significantly associated with worry (p=0.0029), fear (p=0.0030), sadness (p<0.0001), depression (p=0.0008), nervousness (p<0.0001), and loss of interest (p<0.0001). Age ≤69 years was associated with worry (p=0.0003), and female sex with fear (p=0.0002) and sadness (p=0.0026). Trends were found for associations of age with sadness (p=0.045), female sex with nervousness (p=0.034), and chemoradiotherapy with worry (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: Many patients with lung cancer experience emotional distress. Early psycho-oncological assistance may be important, particularly for high-risk patients.

Evaluation of results and costs of high precision radiotherapy (VMAT) compared with conventional radiotherapy (3D) in the treatment of cancer patients with spinal cord compression of metastatic origin.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and economic costs of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (5 fr × 5 Gy), compared with other conventional 3D radiotherapy schemes such as "5 × 4 Gy" and "10 × 3 Gy". Materials and methods: The data about the direct costs for the public health system was obtained from the Economic Information "Management per Patient" System available at the Integrated Health Organization Ezkerraldea Enkarterri Cruces. It is a model of real costs per patient which uses a bottom-up methodology which connects all sources of information generated in clinical practice, integrating healthcare information with economic information. This system presents the real cost per individualized patient, and shows the traceability of all clinical care. The costs of "typical patients" requiring hospital admission were identified for each of the three radiotherapy schemes based on the clinical activity and the material and human resources that were used. Results: The 5 × 5 Gy scheme has a cost of EUR 4,801.48, which is 1.64% higher (EUR 77) than the "5 × 4 Gy" scheme (EUR 4,724.05). The "10 × 3 Gy" scheme has a cost of EUR 8,394.61, which is 74.8% higher (EUR 3,593) than the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme. The main cost factor in the "10 × 3 Gy" scheme is hospitalization, since patients are at hospital for 2 weeks compared with 1 week in the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme. Conclusions: The cost per patient of the VMAT "5 × 5 Gy" radiotherapy scheme is notably lower than that of the "10 × 3 Gy" scheme (conventional 3D radiotherapy), with the advantage of being administered in half the time. In relation to the scheme with 5 Gy × 4 sessions, the cost is similar to that of the "5 × 5 Gy" scheme.

Emotional Problems Prior to Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Being scheduled for radiotherapy can cause emotional distress. This study aimed to identify risk factors in 338 patients assigned to radiotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen potential risk factors including the COVID-19 pandemic were investigated for associations with the six emotional problems included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer. RESULTS: Worry and fears were significantly associated with age ≤60 years; sadness with age and Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <90; depression with KPS and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3; loss of interest with KPS. Trends were found for associations between sadness and additional breast cancer/DCIS, Charlson Index and chemotherapy; between depression and additional breast cancer/DCIS, treatment volume and nodal stage N1-3; between nervousness and additional breast cancer/DCIS, mastectomy and triple-negativity; between loss of interest and Charlson Index, family history of breast cancer/DCIS, invasive cancer, chemotherapy, and treatment volume. The COVID-19 pandemic did not increase emotional problems. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for emotional problems were identified. Patients with such factors should receive psychological support well before radiotherapy.

Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis Dysfunction after Whole Brain Radiotherapy - A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hypothalamic-pituitary (HT-P) dysfunction is one of the most common endocrine late effects following cranial radiotherapy. However, there are currently no specific data describing this complication in adult-onset cancer patients after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The present cohort study aims to establish the prevalence of HT-P axis dysfunction in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six cancer patients previously treated with WBRT (median follow-up=20.5 months) received standardized endocrine check-up focusing on HT-P function. RESULTS: In 50% of the patients, impaired hypothalamic-pituitary function was detected during follow-up. While functional loss of a single hormonal axis was evident in 34.6% of patients, 7.7% showed an impairment of multiple endocrine axes, and one patient developed adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency. Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction did not directly correlate with the applied WBRT total doses. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction appeared to be common after WBRT and was diagnosed as early as 6 months following radiation. This finding highlights the need for routine endocrine follow-up even in patients with limited life expectancy.

Results of Tri-Modality Therapy for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Elderly cancer patients are more prevalent and require special attention. This study focused on the outcome of elderly (≥65 years) rectal cancer patients treated with tri-modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients receiving neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and resection for locally advanced rectal cancers were retrospectively evaluated. Nine characteristics were analyzed for loco-regional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) including tumor location, gender, age, performance status, radiotherapy technique, primary tumor/lymph node categories, downstaging and histological grading. RESULTS: The 5-year rates of LRC, MFS and OS were 91%, 78% and 87%, respectively. Radio-chemotherapy was not completed in 12 patients (11%) due to toxicity; 18 patients (17%) experienced grade 3 toxicities. A total of 29 patients (28%) had surgical complications. On multivariate analyses, MFS was significantly associated with downstaging (p=0.003) and OS with lower histological grade (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Tri-modality therapy resulted in promising outcomes and was tolerated reasonably well by elderly patients. Prognostic factors were identified that may help personalize future treatment.

Pulmonary vein isolation by radiosurgery: implications for non-invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) has been established in clinical routine as a curative treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). While catheter ablation carries procedural risks, radiosurgery might be able to non-invasively induce lesions at the PV ostia to block veno-atrial electrical conduction. This porcine feasibility and dose escalation study determined the effect of radiosurgery on electrophysiologic properties of the left atrial-PV junction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight adult Goettingen mini-pigs underwent electrophysiological voltage mapping in the left atrium and the upper right PV. Radiation was delivered with a conventional linear accelerator. A single homogeneous dose ranging from 22.5 to 40 Gy was applied circumferentially to the target vein antrum. Six months after radiosurgery, electrophysiological mapping was repeated and a histological examination performed. Voltage mapping consistently showed electrical potentials in the upper right PV at baseline. Pacing the target vein prompted atrial excitation, thus proving veno-atrial electrical conduction. After 6 months, radiation had reduced PV electrogram amplitudes. This was dose dependent with a mean interaction effect of -5.8%/Gy. Complete block of atrio-venous electrical conduction occurred after 40 Gy dose application. Histology revealed transmural scarring of the targeted PV musculature with doses >30 Gy. After 40 Gy, it spanned the entire circumference in accordance with pulmonary vein isolation. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein isolation to treat AF can be achieved by radiosurgery with a conventional linear accelerator. Yet, it requires a high radiation dose which might limit clinical applicability.

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of two brain metastasis treatment modalities from a payer's perspective: stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgical resection.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the cost-effectiveness of two brain metastatic treatment modalities, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus surgical resection (SR), from the perspective of Germany's Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) System. METHODS: Retrospectively reviewing 373 patients with brain metastases (BMs) who underwent SR (n=113) and SRS (n=260). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for selection bias (n=98 each); means of survival time and survival curves were defined by the Kaplan-Meier estimator; and medical costs of follow-up treatment were calculated by the Direct (Lin) method. The bootstrap resampling technique was used to assess the impact of uncertainty. RESULTS: Survival time means of SR and SRS were 13.0, 18.4 months, respectively (P=0.000). Medians of free brain tumor time were 10.4 months for SR and 13.8 months for SRS (P=0.003). Number of repeated SRS treatments significantly influenced the survival time of SRS (R(2)=0.249; P=0.006). SRS had a lower average cost per patient (€9964 - SD: 1047; Skewness: 7273) than SR (€11647 - SD: 1594; Skewness: 0.465), leading to an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of €-3740 per life year saved (LYS), meaning that using SRS costs €1683 less than SR per targeted patient, but increases LYS by 0.45 years. CONCLUSION: SRS is more cost-effective than SR in the treatment of brain metastasis (BM) from the SHI perspective. When the clinical conditions allow it, early intervention with SRS in new BM cases and frequent SRS repetition in new BM recurrent cases should be advised.

Radiochemotherapy including cisplatin alone versus cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal radiochemotherapy regimen for advanced head-and-neck cancer is still debated. This nonrandomized study compares two cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens in 128 patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of either two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 54) or two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 74). RESULTS: At least one grade 3 toxicity occurred in 25 of 54 patients (46%) receiving cisplatin alone and in 52 of 74 patients (70%) receiving cisplatin + 5-FU. The latter regimen was particularly associated with increased rates of mucositis (p = 0.027) and acute skin toxicity (p = 0.001). Seven of 54 (13%) and 20 of 74 patients (27%) received only one chemotherapy course due to treatment-related acute toxicity. Late toxicity in terms of xerostomia, neck fibrosis, skin toxicity, and lymphedema was not significantly different. The 2-year locoregional control rates were 67% after cisplatin alone and 52% after cisplatin + 5-FU (p = 0.35). The metastases-free survival rates were 79% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.65), and the overall survival rates 70% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.10). On multivariate analysis, outcome was significantly associated with performance status, T-category, N-category, hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy, and radiotherapy break > 1 week. CONCLUSION: Two courses of fractionated cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day) alone appear preferable, as this regimen resulted in similar outcome and late toxicity as two courses of cisplatin + 5-FU, but in significantly less acute toxicity.