The influence of bowel management on urodynamic findings in spina bifida children with detrusor overactivity and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of bowel management on urodynamic findings in spina bifida children with detrusor overactivity (DO) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2019 we prospectively evaluated 39 consecutive spina bifida children with DO and DSD (18 (46.2%) boys and 21 (53.8%) girls, aged 4-16 years; mean age 9.5 ± 3.7 years) who received bowel management and we treated their bowel dysfunction with an aim of alleviating the symptoms of constipation, preventing constant overdistension of the rectosigmoid, providing regular emptying of the colon and faecal continence. Bowel management included daily enema, laxative application and a special diet who was performed during 12 months. All children had undergone urodynamic studies before and after starting bowel management, with no changes in their urological treatment. RESULTS: Bowel management caused an increase in maximum bladder capacity from 183.0 (112.0-234.0) to 237.0 (165.0-298.0) (p < 0.001). When maximal bladder capacity adjusted for age there was also significant increment (adjusted before 0.54 (0.47-0.64), adjusted after 0.75 (0.70-0.82), p < 0.001). In addition, we observed a decrease in maximal detrusor pressure from 64.3 (49.0-77.0) to 46.4 (32.0-59.0) cm H2O (p < 0.001) and an increase in bladder compliance from 3.0 (2.0-3.3) to 5.6 (3.9-6.6) ml/cm H2O (p < 0.001). There was also significant reductions in leak point pressure from 62.0 (48.0-69.0) to 39.0 (30.0-43.0) cm H2O (p = 0.001), and significant reductions in post-void residual volume (PVR) from 165.0 (128.0-187.0) to 98.0 (68.0-136.0) ml in our 13 patients who could achieve spontaneous voiding (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administering bowel management may be useful for bladder function and urodynamic findings in spina bifida children with DO and DSD. Therefore, bowel management should form an integral part of the treatment in spina bifida children with DO and DSD.

Impact of bowel management in alleviating symptoms of urinary incontinence in patients with spina bifida associated with overactive bladder and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of bowel management on urinary incontinence in patients with spina bifida associated with overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was carried out during the period 2014-2017. A total of 35 patients (group 1) were administered bowel management combined with anticholinergic medication therapy and clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and 35 patients (group 2) were treated only with anticholinergic medication therapy and CIC. Bowel management included daily enema, laxative application and a special diet, with the aim of treating constipation, evaluated according to the Roma III criteria and echosonographically determined transversal rectal diameter. The effects of the administered bowel management on urinary incontinence were assessed according to the mean dry interval between two CICs for all patients. All patients were followed up for 1 year, during which data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference with regard to age, gender and baseline clinical features between the two groups. In group 1, the mean ± sd dry interval between two CICs was 150.0 ± 36.4 min, and group 2 it was 101.3 ± 51.6 min. There was a significant difference in urinary incontinence, i.e. in the mean dry interval, between the two groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administering bowel management considerably increased the mean dry interval, thus greatly alleviating the symptoms of urinary incontinence. For this reason, bowel management should form an integral part of the treatment of patients with spina bifida and OAB and DSD.

The influence of bowel management on the frequency of urinary infections in spina bifida patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of bowel management on the frequency of urinary infections in spina bifida patients. STUDY DESIGN: The research was carried out from 2014 to 2017, with the recruitment process from June 2014 to March 2016. The first group consisted of 35 patients who were administered bowel management combined with anticholinergic medication therapy and clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). The second group consisted of 35 patients who were treated only with anticholinergic medication therapy and CIC. Bowel management included daily enema, laxative application, and a special diet, with a view to treating constipation that was estimated on the basis of Roma III criteria and echosonographically determined transversal rectal diameter. The effects of the administered bowel management on urinary infections were estimated on the basis of the number of urinary infections before and after the administered therapy. The observation period of every patient was 1 year. RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences regarding age, gender, and baseline clinical features between the two groups. In the group treated with bowel management combined with anticholinergic medication therapy and CIC, the average number of urinary infections was 0.3 ± 0.5 SD, whereas in the group treated exclusively with anticholinergic medication therapy and CIC the average number of urinary infections was 1.1 ± 1.0 SD. There was a statistical difference regarding urinary infections, that is the average number of urinary infections between these two groups of patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administering bowel management considerably decreases the frequency of urinary infections, and should form an integral part of treatment of spina bifida patients.

Body weight and waist circumference as predictors of vitamin D deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vitamin D deficiency is a well-established risk factor for bone disease, but emerging data suggest that altered vitamin D homeostasis may play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with T2DM with/without CVD, to correlate it with anthropometric and metabolic parameters and to determine the predictors of vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with T2DM (49 male/39 female, aged 61.0 +/- 0.9 yrs, body mass index (BMI) 29.9 +/- 0.4 kg/m2) and 67 patients (44 male/23 female, aged 63.6 +/- 1.0 yrs, BMI 29.2 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) with T2DM and CVD (myocardial infarction in 57 patients and angina pectoris in 10 patients) were included in this study. These patients were compared with 87 healthy subjects (35 male/52 female, aged 52.8 +/- 1.4 yrs, BMI 27.2 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). Weight, height, waist circumference and BMI were recorded in all patients. Also, total cholesterol, triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were measured in all. According to 25(OH)D level, all subjects were divided into three categories: severe vitamin D deficiency (< or = 15 ng/mL), vitamin D insufficiency (15-20 ng/mL) and vitamin D sufficiency (?20 ng/mL). We correlated vitamin D levels with anthropometric and metabolic status and determined the predictors of vitamin D deficiency. RESULTS: Severe vitamin D deficiency was registered in 16.1% healthy subjects, in 21.6% patients with T2DM and in 26.9% patients with T2DM and CVD. Patients with T2DM who were vitamin D deficient had increased weight, waist circumference, cholesterol and triglyceride levels when compared with patients with T2DM who had sufficient vitamin D level. 25(OH)D levels correlated with BMI and waist circumference in all subjects, but did not correlate with metabolic parameters (lipids, HbA1c). The best predictors of vitamin D level in all subjects were weight, waist circumference and BMI. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with T2DM and particularly in patients with T2DM and CVD suggests that supplementation with vitamin D may be beneficial although there is still not sufficient evidence for recommending prescribing vitamin D.