Altered facial muscle innervation pattern in patients with postparetic facial synkinesis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Using surface electrostimulation, we aimed to use facial nerve mapping (FNM) in healthy subjects and patients with postparetic facial synkinesis (PPFS) to define functional facial target regions that can be stimulated selectively. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective cohort study. METHODS: FNM was performed bilaterally in 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients with PPFS. Single-pulse surface FNM started at the main trunk of the facial nerve and followed the peripheral branches in a distal direction. Stimulation started with 0.1 mA and increased in 0.1 mA increments. The procedure was simultaneously video recorded and evaluated offline. RESULTS: A total of 1,873 spots were stimulated, and 1,875 facial movements were evaluated. The stimulation threshold was higher on the PPFS side (average = 9.8 ± 1.0 mA) compared to the contralateral side (4.1 ± 0.8 mA) for all stimulation sites or compared to healthy subjects (4.1 ± 0.5 mA; all P < .01). In healthy subjects, selective electrostimulation ± one unintended coactivation was possible at all sites in >80% of cases, with the exception of pulling up the corner of the mouth (65%-75%). On the PPFS side, stimulation was possible for puckering lips movements in 60%/75% (selective stimulation ± one coactivation, respectively), blinking in 55%/80%, pulling up the corner of the mouth in 50%/85%, brow raising in 5%/85, and raising the chin in 0%/35% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FNM mapping for surgical planning and selective electrostimulation of functional facial regions is possible even in patients with PPFS. FNM may be a tool for patient-specific evaluation and placement of electrodes to stimulate the correct nerve branches in future bionic devices (e.g., for a bionic eye blink). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:E320-E326, 2020.

Brief Electrical Stimulation Improves Functional Recovery After Femoral But Not After Facial Nerve Injury in Rats.

Brief low-frequency electrical stimulation (ES, 1 h, 20 Hz) of the proximal nerve stump has emerged as a potential adjunct treatment for nerve injury. Despite available experimental and clinical data, the potentials and limitations of the ES therapy still have to be defined using different animal models, types of nerves, and clinical settings. Here, we show that brief ES of the proximal stump of the transected rat femoral nerve causes, as estimated by motion analysis, enhanced functional recovery reaching preoperative levels within 5 months of injury, in contrast to the incomplete restoration in sham-stimulated (SS) animals. The functional advantage seen in ES rats was associated with higher numbers, as compared with SS, of correctly targeted quadriceps motoneurons. In contrast, ES prior to facial nerve suture did not lead to improvement of whisking compared with SS. Lack of functional effects of the treatment was correlated with lack of changes, as compared with SS, in the precision of muscle reinnervation and frequency of abnormally innervated muscle fibers. These results show that ES is an effective therapy in a spinal nerve injury model leading to complete restoration of function. Although this finding and the safety of the procedure are encouraging, the results for the facial nerve model suggest that brief ES may not be a universal treatment for nerve injuries. Anat Rec, 302:1304-1313, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

High variability of facial muscle innervation by facial nerve branches: A prospective electrostimulation study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine by intraoperative electric stimulation which peripheral facial nerve (FN) branches are functionally connected to which facial muscle functions. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective clinical study. METHODS: Seven patients whose peripheral FN branching was exposed during parotidectomy under FN monitoring received a systematic electrostimulation of each branch starting with 0.1 mA and stepwise increase to 2 mA with a frequency of 3 Hz. The electrostimulation and the facial and neck movements were video recorded simultaneously and evaluated independently by two investigators. RESULTS: A uniform functional allocation of specific peripheral FN branches to a specific mimic movement was not possible. Stimulation of the whole spectrum of branches of the temporofacial division could lead to eye closure (orbicularis oculi muscle function). Stimulation of the spectrum of nerve branches of the cervicofacial division could lead to reactions in the midface (nasal and zygomatic muscles) as well as around the mouth (orbicularis oris and depressor anguli oris muscle function). Frontal and eye region were exclusively supplied by the temporofacial division. The region of the mouth and the neck was exclusively supplied by the cervicofacial division. Nose and zygomatic region were mainly supplied by the temporofacial division, but some patients had also nerve branches of the cervicofacial division functionally supplying the nasal and zygomatic region. CONCLUSIONS: FN branches distal to temporofacial and cervicofacial division are not necessarily covered by common facial nerve monitoring. Future bionic devices will need a patient-specific evaluation to stimulate the correct peripheral nerve branches to trigger distinct muscle functions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 127:1288-1295, 2017.