Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 337(2): 69-76, 1997 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9211675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous trials have suggested that calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce the risk of preeclampsia. However, differences in study design and a low dietary calcium intake in the populations studied limit acceptance of the data. METHODS: We randomly assigned 4589 healthy nulliparous women who were 13 to 21 weeks pregnant to receive daily treatment with either 2 g of elemental calcium or placebo for the remainder of their pregnancies. Surveillance for preeclampsia was conducted by personnel unaware of treatment-group assignments, using standardized measurements of blood pressure and urinary protein excretion at uniformly scheduled prenatal visits, protocols for monitoring these measurements during the hospitalization for delivery, and reviews of medical records of unscheduled outpatient visits and all hospitalizations. RESULTS: Calcium supplementation did not significantly reduce the incidence or severity of preeclampsia or delay its onset. Preeclampsia occurred in 158 of the 2295 women in the calcium group (6.9 percent) and 168 of the 2294 women in the placebo group (7.3 percent) (relative risk, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.16). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the prevalence of pregnancy-associated hypertension without preeclampsia (15.3 percent vs. 17.3 percent) or of all hypertensive disorders (22.2 percent vs. 24.6 percent). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures during pregnancy were similar in both groups. Calcium did not reduce the numbers of preterm deliveries, small-for-gestational-age births, or fetal and neonatal deaths; nor did it increase urolithiasis during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy did not prevent preeclampsia, pregnancy-associated hypertension, or adverse perinatal outcomes in healthy nulliparous women.


Assuntos
Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Cálcio/urina , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Paridade , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez/urina , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Resultado da Gravidez , Proteinúria/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Cálculos Urinários/induzido quimicamente , Cálculos Urinários/epidemiologia
2.
Control Clin Trials ; 17(5): 442-69, 1996 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8932976

RESUMO

The results of ten clinical trials suggest that supplemental calcium may prevent preeclampsia. However, methodologic problems and differences in study design limit the acceptance of the results and their relevance to other patient populations. Many of the trials were conducted in countries where, unlike the United States, the usual daily diet contained little calcium. Moreover, none of the trials has reported the outcome of systematic surveillance for urolithiasis, a potential complication of calcium supplementation. In response to the need for a thorough evaluation of the effects of calcium supplementation for the prevention of preeclampsia in the United States, the trial of Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) was undertaken at five university medical centers. Healthy nulliparous patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 g supplemental calcium daily (n = 2295) or placebo (n = 2294) in a double-blind study. Study tablets were administered beginning from 13 to 21 completed weeks of gestation and continued until the termination of pregnancy. CPEP employed detailed diagnostic criteria, standardized techniques of measurement, and systematic surveillance for the major study endpoints and for urolithiasis. The nutrient intake of each patient was assessed at randomization and at 32-33 weeks gestation. This report describes the study rationale, design, and methods.


Assuntos
Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/métodos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Informação Administrativa , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Nutricional , Cooperação do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Placebos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Controle de Qualidade , Distribuição Aleatória , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Tamanho da Amostra , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatística como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Cálculos Urinários/diagnóstico , Cálculos Urinários/etiologia , Cálculos Urinários/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA