Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 50(3): 203-209, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29177982

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In some patients, both an electrophysiological examination (EPS) and a coronary angiography (CA) are necessary. It might be preferable to choose a combined approach of EPS and CA versus performing them consecutively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the type and rate of adverse events between both approaches. METHODS: Patients were eligible if they underwent a CA and an EPS in a combined approach or in a time interval of at most 2 months. In all patients, clinical adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1184 patients were included. CA and EPS were performed in a combined procedure (comb) in 492 patients, whereas they were performed consecutively in 692 patients (cons). The acute major complication rate was 0.67%, showing no differences between both groups. In the comb 6.9% and in the cons 6.6% of vascular complications were observed (p = 0.20). The rates of AV fistula and hematoma needing transfusion showed a significantly higher rate in the cons group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.045, respectively). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, age was a significant predictor for groin complications. After propensity matching, AV fistula occurred significantly more often in the cons group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Overall, serious adverse events were rare and there were no differences between the combined approach of EPS and CA and the consecutive approach; however, the occurrence of AV fistula and groin hematoma needing transfusion occurred significantly less in the combined procedure group. Therefore, a combined approach is preferable to a consecutive one.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Hematoma/etiologia , Fístula Vascular/etiologia , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fístula Vascular/epidemiologia , Fístula Vascular/fisiopatologia
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 28(6): 636-641, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28316148

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, different strategies including complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation and linear lesions (LL) have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, it is still a matter of debate if extended substrate modification improves long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the benefit of LL in addition to PVI and CFAE ablation regarding freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent AF. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized trial including 90 patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF. All patients underwent PVI and CFAE ablation. If AF did not terminate to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm, patients were randomized to direct current cardioversion (Group 1; n = 45) or LL (Group 2; n = 45). Primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. (NCT02059369) RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups with more than half of the patients having structural heart disease. The primary endpoint was reached in 37% in Group 1 (G1) and 16% in Group 2 (G2; P = 0.03). After a total number of 1.4 ± 0.5 (G1) versus 1.7 ± 0.4 (G2; P = 0.01) procedures, freedom from any arrhythmia was reached in 54% in G1 and 65% in G2 (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: In persistent AF ablation, LL in addition to PVI and CFAE show a significantly lower success rate after a single procedure compared to PVI and CFAE. Following LL, significantly more patients needed a reablation to reach a similar success rate during a 12-month follow-up.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/cirurgia , Frequência Cardíaca , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Potenciais de Ação , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Alemanha , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Veias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 28(1): 109-114, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27653802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Contact-force (CF) sensing catheters are increasingly used in electrophysiological procedures due to their efficacy and safety profile. As data about the accuracy of fiberoptic CF technology are scarce, we sought to quantify it using in vitro experiments. METHODS AND RESULTS: A force sensor was built with a flexible membrane to allow exact reference force measurements for each set of experiments. A TactiCath Quartz (TCQ) ablation catheter was brought in contact with the force sensor membrane in order to compare the TCQ force measurements to sensor reference force measurements. Measurements were performed at different tip angles (0°/perpendicular contact, 45°, 90°/parallel contact), with fluid irrigation, different degrees of catheter deflection, and using a sheath. The accuracy of the TCQ force measurements was 0.9 ± 0.9 g (0°), 0.8 ± 0.8 g (45°) and 1.2 ± 1.3 g (90°), 0.8 ± 0.7 g (irrigation), 0.8 ± 0.8 g (deflection), and 0.8 ± 0.9 g (sheath); this was not significantly different among all experimental conditions. The precision was ≤3.8%. CONCLUSION: CF measurements using a fiberoptic sensing technology show a high level of accuracy and precision, without being significantly influenced by tip angle, fluid irrigation, catheter deflection or use of a sheath.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Cateteres Cardíacos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/instrumentação , Transdutores de Pressão , Calibragem , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Cateteres Cardíacos/normas , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/normas , Desenho de Equipamento , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/normas , Teste de Materiais , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Irrigação Terapêutica , Transdutores de Pressão/normas
4.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 105(8): 657-665, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26825328

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can cause oversensing and subsequently inappropriate ICD therapies. We retrospectively investigated the current incidence and clinical relevance of oversensing related EMI in a large cohort of ICD patients. METHODS: From January 2005 to April 2013, all ICD interrogations performed at our institution were analyzed for the occurrence of oversensing related EMI. EMI episodes were classified as clinically significant, potentially significant or of minor significance. To identify risk factors for EMI, we also analyzed different lead models in our cohort (integrated vs true bipolar leads). RESULTS: Data of 2940 ICD patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 2322 male patients, 7772 patient-years) were retrospectively analyzed for the occurrence of EMI. During the observation period, a total of 145 (hospital environment n = 97, non-hospital environment n = 48) episodes occurred and resulted in an overall EMI incidence, i.e. event rate, of 1.87 % per patient per year. Focusing on clinically significant or potentially significant episodes, the EMI incidence was 0.27 % per patient per year. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant higher hazard of oversensing for patients with integrated bipolar leads compared to patients with true bipolar leads (HR = 2.21; 95 % CI 0.90-5.39; p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that EMI continues to occur in everyday life. Patients should be well informed about the potential sources and risks of EMI but they need not be overly concerned since the risk of EMI-especially in a non-hospital environment-is low.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Campos Eletromagnéticos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Falha de Prótese , Idoso , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Teste de Materiais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Europace ; 18(9): 1406-10, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26589627

RESUMO

AIMS: This study presents and evaluates the impact of a new lowest-dose fluoroscopy protocol (Siemens AG), especially designed for electrophysiology (EP) procedures, on X-ray dose levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2014 to March 2015, 140 patients underwent an EP study on an Artis zee angiography system. The standard low-dose protocol was operated at 23 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 120 nGy (cine-loop), the new lowest-dose protocol was operated at 8 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 36 nGy (cine-loop). Procedural data, X-ray times, and doses were analysed in 100 complex left atrial and in 40 standard EP procedures. The resulting dose-area products were 877.9 ± 624.7 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, standard low dose), 199 ± 159.6 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, lowest dose), 387.7 ± 36.0 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, standard low dose), and 90.7 ± 62.3 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, lowest dose), P < 0.01. In the low-dose and lowest-dose groups, procedure times were 132.6 ± 35.7 vs. 126.7 ± 34.7 min (P = 0.40, complex procedures) and 72.3 ± 20.9 vs. 85.2 ± 44.1 min (P = 0.24, standard procedures), radiofrequency (RF) times were 53.8 ± 26.1 vs. 50.4 ± 29.4 min (P = 0.54, complex procedures) and 10.1 ± 9.9 vs. 12.2 ± 14.7 min (P = 0.60, standard procedures). One complication occurred in the standard low-dose and lowest-dose groups (P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: The new lowest-dose imaging protocol reduces X-ray dose levels by 77% compared with the currently available standard low-dose protocol. From an operator standpoint, lowest X-ray dose levels create a different, reduced image quality. The new image quality did not significantly affect procedure or RF times and did not result in higher complication rates. Regarding radiological protection, operating at lowest-dose settings should become standard in EP procedures.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Cineangiografia/métodos , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Cateteres Cardíacos , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Cineangiografia/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 26(1): 7-13, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25091566

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of dissociated pulmonary vein (DPV) activity after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is still poorly defined. We evaluated electrophysiological features and clinical impact on long-term outcome of DPV activity. METHODS: A total of 243 patients (mean age 63 ± 11 years; 63% males) undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. DPV activity was defined as a residual low frequency irregular PV rhythm. Patients were divided into Group 1 (presence of DPV activity; n = 65) or Group 2 (absence of DPV activity; n = 178). RESULTS: Of 936 isolated PVs, 112 PVs (12%) showed DPV activity. DPV activity was observed more frequently in PVs identified as AF triggers (P = 0.026). During follow-up (mean 12 ± 7 months), 15 of 65 patients of Group 1 (23%) and 57 of 178 patients of Group 2 (32%) had an arrhythmia recurrence (P = 0.23). At linear regression analysis, no independent predictor for clinical recurrence was identified. During the repeat ablation, 62 of 72 patients (86%) showed a recovered PV conduction without difference between the 2 groups. Clinically, all patients of Group 1 with PV reconnection (n = 13/15) had a recurrence of paroxysmal AF. In Group 2, 5 of 52 patients with reconnected PV developed non-PV related arrhythmias. CONCLUSION: DPV activity occurred in 12% of PVs after PVI and was observed more frequently in PVs identified as AF triggers. DPV activity was not predictive for AF recurrence during follow-up. PV-left atrium reconnection involving PVs with DPV activity leads to AF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Potenciais de Ação , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Eletrocardiografia , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Veias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Clin Cardiol ; 36(7): 422-6, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23670880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ablation procedures in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) includes isolation of all pulmonary veins (PVs). We hypothesized that an approach using an algorithm to detect arrhythmogenic PVs (aPVs) might lead to shorter procedure duration (PD) and fewer proarrhythmic effects (PE). HYPOTHESIS: Isolation of the aPVs only leads to a reduced PD, reduced PEs, and fewer adverse events, with a success rate comparable to the standard all-PV approach. METHODS: In this prospective trial, 207 patients with PAF were randomized to undergo isolation of the aPV (AG group, n = 105) or isolation of all PVs (VG group, n = 102). The aPV was identified by atrial fibrillation (AF) induction, focal discharge, or short local PV decremental conduction during PV pacing. Patients were followed with repetitive 7-day Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) after 3, 6, and 12 months in our arrhythmia clinic. RESULTS: In 97% of patients, at least 1 aPV was identified (mean, 2.1). PD did not differ significantly (152.3 ± 57.1 minutes vs 162 ± 68 minutes, P = 0.27) between the groups, but the number of radiofrequency (RF) applications and fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose were significantly lower in the AG group than in the VG group. The occurrence of PE (new-onset atrial tachycardia) and adverse events (AE) did not differ between the 2 groups (P = 0.1). Sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medication (documented on 7-day Holter ECGs) 12 months after a single procedure was achieved in 53% in the AG group and 59% in the VG group (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Isolation of the aPVs detected by a straightforward algorithm leads to similar success rates compared to a standard all-PV approach with regard to PD, AE, or PE and is associated with less RF and a shorter FT.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Idoso , Algoritmos , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Alemanha , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Veias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Recidiva , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 24(4): 388-95, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The endpoint of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if sinus rhythm (SR) as endpoint of persistent AF ablation has a better long-term outcome compared to atrial tachycardia (AT) or AF at the end of the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2011, 191 consecutive patients undergoing de novo catheter ablation for symptomatic persistent and long-standing persistent AF using a sequential ablation approach (including pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and linear lesions) were included in the study. According to the result at the end of ablation procedure, patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with termination of AF into SR (Group 1, n = 62), patients with AT undergoing cardioversion (CV) (Group 2, n = 47), or patients with AF undergoing CV (Group 3, n = 82). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. At 12 months, estimated proportions of patients free from any arrhythmia recurrence were 42% for Group 1, 13% for Group 2, and 25% for Group 3 (P = 0.002). In a Cox regression analysis only termination into SR was associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.62; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: If SR is achieved as endpoint of persistent and long-standing persistent AF ablation using a sequential ablation approach it is associated with the highest long-term single procedure success rate compared to AT or AF at the end of the procedure.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/cirurgia , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Cardioversão Elétrica , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Feminino , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Veias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Taquicardia Supraventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA