De novo lipogenesis predicts short-term body-composition response by bioelectrical impedance analysis to oral nutritional supplements in HIV-associated wasting.

We studied the effects of enteral supplements on protein and energy intakes, body composition, energy expenditure, and gastrointestinal histology in 49 subjects with human immunodeficiency virus-associated weight loss (12.7 +/- 0.9% of body wt). We also determined whether a stable-isotope mass spectrometric measurement at baseline might predict the short-term response of fat-free mass (FFM) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Thirty-nine subjects completed the study after being randomly assigned to receive either a whole-protein-based (n = 22) or a peptide-based (n = 17) formula. A nonsupplemented, nonrandomly assigned group (n = 13) was followed concurrently. Both formulas were well tolerated. Voluntary intakes of energy and protein from nonsupplement sources decreased significantly during supplementation [by 819-1638 kJ (196-382 kcal)/d and 5.6-14.4 g protein/d, respectively; P < 0.01] but to a lesser extent than the intake from the supplement [2300-2510 kJ(550-600 kcal)/d and 19-28 g protein/d, respectively], so that net increases in intakes of protein and energy (P < 0.03), as well as of several vitamins and trace elements were increased. Nevertheless, the mean FFM did not increase for the group as a whole, although there was considerable interindividual heterogeneity. Changes in FFM at 6 wk were significantly inversely correlated (r = 0.65, P < 0.01) with baseline synthesis of fat (de novo hepatic lipogenesis), but not with other potential measures of energy intake (insulin-like growth factor 1 or its binding protein) or inflammation (soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors I or II). The prospective identification of FFM response by measurement of de novo hepatic lipogenesis supported the hypothesis that the subset of wasting patients whose FFM is unresponsive to nutrient supplementation have altered nutrient metabolism.

Long-term effects of early nutritional support with new enterotropic peptide-based formula vs. standard enteral formula in HIV-infected patients: randomized prospective trial.

Despite association with adverse clinical outcome, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated malnutrition has been relatively refractory to conventional nutrition management. Consequently, a prospective randomized trial was conducted to evaluate a new peptide-based enteral formula (NEF) in contrast to a standard enteral formula (SEF) in patients with HIV infection. Eighty early-stage largely asymptomatic patients were randomized into a dietary regimen supplemented with either a ready-to-feed NEF (18.7% protein, 65.5% carbohydrate, 15.8% fat; 1.28 kcal/ml) or SEF (14% protein, 55% carbohydrate, 31% fat; 1.06 kcal/ml). Patients received 2-3 8-oz cans of the NEF or SEF supplement per day for 6 mo. Parameters evaluated at 0 (baseline), 3, and 6 mo included adherence, weight change, anthropometric measurements, serum biochemical indices, gastrointestinal symptoms, physical performance, and intercurrent health events (including hospitalizations). For the 56 evaluable patients, those supplemented with NEF maintained their body weight significantly (p = 0.04) better, had significantly (p = 0.03) more stable triceps skin-fold measurements, and had significantly (p = 0.04) lower blood urea nitrogen than patients consuming the SEF supplement. Consumption of the NEF supplement was also associated with significantly reduced hospitalizations during the 3- to 6-mo evaluation period (p = 0.02). The NEF supplement was well tolerated and did not result in untoward clinical effects. These data suggest that supplemental use of an NEF provides superior nutritional management compared with an SEF for patients with early-stage HIV infection.