RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The development of bionic legs has seen substantial improvements in the past years but people with lower-limb amputation still suffer from impairments in mobility (e.g., altered balance and gait control) due to significant limitations of the contemporary prostheses. Approaching the problem from a human-centered perspective by focusing on user-specific needs can allow identifying critical improvements that can increase the quality of life. While there are several reviews of user needs regarding upper limb prostheses, a comprehensive summary of such needs for those affected by lower limb loss does not exist. METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to extract important needs of the users of lower-limb prostheses. The review included 56 articles in which a need (desire, wish) was reported explicitly by the recruited people with lower limb amputation (N = 8149). RESULTS: An exhaustive list of user needs was collected and subdivided into functional, psychological, cognitive, ergonomics, and other domain. Where appropriate, we have also briefly discussed the developments in prosthetic devices that are related to or could have an impact on those needs. In summary, the users would like to lead an independent life and reintegrate into society by coming back to work and participating in social and leisure activities. Efficient, versatile, and stable gait, but also support to other activities (e.g., sit to stand), contribute to safety and confidence, while appearance and comfort are important for the body image. However, the relation between specific needs, objective measures of performance, and overall satisfaction and quality of life is still an open question. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying user needs is a critical step for the development of new generation lower limb prostheses that aim to improve the quality of life of their users. However, this is not a simple task, as the needs interact with each other and depend on multiple factors (e.g., mobility level, age, gender), while evolving in time with the use of the device. Hence, novel assessment methods are required that can evaluate the impact of the system from a holistic perspective, capturing objective outcomes but also overall user experience and satisfaction in the relevant environment (daily life).
Assuntos
Amputados , Membros Artificiais , Humanos , Amputação Cirúrgica , Amputados/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Extremidade SuperiorRESUMO
Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability in adults in the European Union. It often leads to motor impairments, such as a hemiparetic lower extremity. Research indicates that early task-specific and intensive training promotes neuroplasticity and leads to recovery and/or compensation. One way to provide intensive training early after a stroke is via robot-supported training. A rehabilitation robot was designed by Life Science Robotics (Aalborg, Denmark) that can provide continuous repetitive movements of the hip, knee, and/or ankle in e.g., a lying position. In order to emphasize active contribution by the patient, actively triggered electrical stimulation (via muscle activation) can be combined with robotic assistance. The current study aims to compare different threshold estimation methods for detection of movement intention from muscle activity for actively triggered electrical stimulation during robot-supported leg movement in stroke patients. Three sub-acute stroke patients were included for a single measurement session. They performed knee extension and/or ankle dorsal flexion with four different threshold estimation methods to assess the intention detection threshold to initiate electrostimulation. The thresholds were based on the resting level of muscle activity (of m. rectus femoris or m. tibialis anterior) plus two or three times the standard deviation of the average resting value, or the resting level plus 5% or 10% of the peak muscle activity during a maximal voluntary contraction. The results showed that the method based on the resting muscle activity plus two times the standard deviation was the most stable across the three included stroke patients. This method had a detection success rate of 86.7% and was experienced as moderately comfortable. In conclusion, performing knee extension and/or ankle dorsal flexion with electromyography triggered electrostimulation is feasible in sub-acute stroke patients. Muscle activity-triggered electrostimulation combined with robotic support based on a threshold of resting levels plus two times the standard deviation seems to detect movement initiation most consistently in this small sample of sub-acute stroke patients.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Robótica , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adulto , Eletromiografia , Humanos , Perna (Membro) , Extremidade Inferior , Robótica/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodosRESUMO
The ability to distinguish object stiffness is a very important aspect in object handling, but completely lacking in current myoelectric prostheses. In human hands both tactile and proprioceptive sensory information are required for stiffness determination. Therefore, it was investigated whether it is possible to distinguish object stiffness with vibrotactile feedback of hand opening and grasping force. Three configurations consisting of an array of coin motors and a single miniature vibrotactile transducer were investigated. Ten healthy subjects and seven subjects with upper limb loss due to amputation or congenital defects performed virtual grasping tasks, in which they controlled hand opening and grasping force. They were asked to determine the stiffness of a grasped virtual object from four options. With hand opening feedback alone or in combination with grasping force feedback, correct stiffness determination was achieved in around 60% of the cases and significantly higher than the 25% achieved without feedback or grasping force feedback alone. Despite the equal performance results, the combination of hand opening and grasping force feedback was preferred by the subjects over the hand opening feedback alone. No differences between feedback configurations and between subjects with upper limb loss and healthy subjects were found.