Chemical Shift MRI Monitoring of Chemoembolization Delivery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Feasibility of Initial Clinical Translation.

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of using chemical shift fat-water MRI methods to visualize and measure intrahepatic delivery of ethiodized oil to liver tumors following conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Materials and Methods Twenty-eight participants (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; 22 men) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with cTACE were evaluated with follow-up chemical shift MRI in this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective, institutional review board-approved study. Uptake of ethiodized oil was evaluated at 1-month follow-up chemical shift MRI. Measurements of tumor size (MRI and CT), attenuation and enhancement (CT), fat content percentage, and tumor:normal ratio (MRI) were compared by lesion for responders versus nonresponders, as assessed with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Adverse events and overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method were secondary end points. Results Focal tumor ethiodized oil retention was 46% (12 of 26 tumors) at 24 hours and 47% (18 of 38 tumors) at 1 month after cTACE. Tumor volume at CT did not differ between EASL-defined responders and nonresponders (P = .06). Tumor ethiodized oil volume measured with chemical shift MRI was statistically significantly higher for EASL-defined nonresponders (P = .02). Doxorubicin dosing (P = .53), presence of focal fat (P = .83), and a combined end point of focal fat and low doxorubicin dosing (P = .97) did not stratify overall survival after cTACE. Conclusion Chemical shift MRI allowed for assessment of tumor delivery of ethiodized oil out to 1 month after cTACE in participants with HCC and demonstrated tumor ethiodized oil volume as a potential tool for stratification of tumor response by EASL criteria. Keywords: MRI, Chemical Shift Imaging, CT, Hepatic Chemoembolization, Ethiodized Oil Clinicaltrials.gov registration no.: NCT02173119 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data.

UNLABELLED: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using lipiodol-based regimens, including the administration of an anticancer-in-oil emulsion followed by embolic agents, is widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This approach has been supported by meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) performed more than a decade ago. We performed a systematic review to understand current efficacy and safety data of lipiodol TACE in treatment of HCC. A search of the literature published between January 1, 1980 and June 30, 2013 was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. All potentially relevant publications were reviewed and articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of a total of 1,564 articles reviewed, 101 articles, including a total of 10,108 patients treated with lipiodol TACE, were selected for the efficacy analysis. Objective response rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.6-61.5). Overall survival (OS) was 70.3% at 1 year, 51.8% at 2 years, 40.4% at 3 years, and 32.4% at 5 years. Median OS was 19.4 months (95% CI: 16.2-22.6). A total of 217 articles presenting precise description on numbers of adverse events (AEs) were selected for the safety review: In these studies, a total of 21,461 AEs were reported in 15,351 patients. Liver enzyme abnormalities were the most commonly observed AE, followed by the symptoms associated with postembolization syndrome. Overall mortality rate was 0.6% and the most common cause of death was related to acute liver insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic literature review, survival figures of HCC patients undergoing lipiodol TACE appear to be in line with those reported in previous RCTs, and no new or unexpected safety concerns were identified. (Hepatology 2016;64:106-116).

Transcatheter therapy for hepatic malignancy: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

The field of interventional oncology includes tumor ablation as well as the use of transcatheter therapies such as embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Terminology and reporting standards for tumor ablation have been developed. The development of standardization of terminology and reporting criteria for transcatheter therapies should provide a similar framework to facilitate the clearest communication among investigators and provide the greatest flexibility in comparing established and emerging technologies. An appropriate vehicle for reporting the various aspects of catheter directed therapy is outlined, including classification of therapies and procedure terms, appropriate descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology to define imaging and pathologic findings. Methods for standardizing the reporting of outcomes toxicities, complications, and other important aspects that require attention when reporting clinical results are addressed. It is the intention of the group that adherence to the recommendations will facilitate achievement of the group's main objective: improved precision and communication for reporting the various aspects of transcatheter management of hepatic malignancy that will translate to more accurate comparison of technologies and results and, ultimately, to improved patient outcomes.