Treatment preferences and use of diagnostic imaging in midportion Achilles tendinopathy by Australian allied health professionals.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to examine the treatment preferences and use of diagnostic imaging by Australian allied health professionals in the management of midportion Achilles tendinopathy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of Australian allied health professionals. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to registered Australian physiotherapists, podiatrists, myotherapists, exercise physiologists, osteopaths, and chiropractors between September 2018 and October 2019. This survey captured information on clinician demographic, treatment modalities, frequency of use and the reasons for their preferences. A descriptive analysis of the data was employed with nominal and ordinal data analysed using frequency counts. RESULTS: Valid responses were captured from 283 respondents, the majority (229, 80.9%) being physiotherapists. Exercise-based therapy and education were the most commonly used treatments (98.6% and 92.6%, respectively), with the majority of respondents (91.8% and 89.3%) stating that they "always" provided these interventions. Respondents stated that they utilised a number of exercise modalities within the last three years (median = 3, IQR = 3 to 4). Other interventions used as adjunct treatments included heel lifts for shoes (70.0%), massage (59.4%), and taping (40.3%). The majority of respondents (76.7%) never or rarely used diagnostic imaging, citing its limited impact on treatment decision-making and potential for negative impact on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Australian allied health professionals predominantly use exercise and education, but also use adjuncts such as heel lifts and massage, in the management of midportion Achilles tendinopathy. The results of this study may inform research priorities to generate high quality evidence that best reflects clinical practice.

Effect of Action Observation Therapy in the Rehabilitation of Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of action observation therapy (AOT) in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions. DATA SOURCES: Searches were completed until July 2020 from the electronic databases Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (via OVID SP), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing AOT with standard care were assessed. Musculoskeletal (amputee, orthopedic) and neurologic (dementia, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, stroke) conditions were included. There were no age limitations. Articles had to be available in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full extracts of studies for eligibility and assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data extraction included participant characteristics and intervention duration, frequency, and type. RESULTS: The effect of AOT in different outcome measures (OMs) was referenced in terms of body structures and functions, activities and participation, and environmental factors as outlined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Of the 3448 articles identified, 36 articles with 1405 patients met the inclusion criteria. Seven of the 11 meta-analyses revealed a significant effect of intervention, with results presented using the mean difference and 95% CI. A best evidence synthesis was used across all OMs. Strong evidence supports the use of AOT in the rehabilitation of individuals with stroke and Parkinson disease; moderate evidence supports AOT in the rehabilitation of populations with orthopedic and multiple sclerosis diagnoses. However, moderate evidence is provided for and against the effect of AOT in persons with Parkinson disease and cerebral palsy. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that AOT is advantageous in the rehabilitation of certain conditions in improving ICF domains. No conclusions can be drawn regarding treatment parameters because of the heterogeneity of the intervention. AOT has been considerably less explored in musculoskeletal conditions.

At What Age Do Children and Adolescents Develop Lower Limb Tendon Pathology or Tendinopathy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tendon pathology and tendinopathy have been reported in children and adolescents; however, the age at onset and prevalence of the conditions have not been examined systematically. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of lower limb tendon pathology and tendinopathy in children and adolescents, and the factors associated with these conditions in this population. METHODS: Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Scopus, the Web of Science and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database). Studies were included if the prevalence of lower limb tendon pathology and/or tendinopathy were reported in humans under the age of 18 years. Studies were divided according to the method of diagnosis (physical examination, ultrasound or a questionnaire) and further divided into studies that reported prevalence data by tendon [reported two data points (right and left) for each participant] and those that reported prevalence data for each participant [reporting one data point (right or left) per participant]. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Lower limb tendinopathy prevalence (presence of pain and dysfunction) ranged between 8.2 and 33.3%, and increased in prevalence as age increased up to 18 years. The odds ratio for studies reporting tendinopathy by tendon was 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.69) in favour of boys presenting with tendinopathy. Study aims and reporting methods were heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: The age at onset of lower limb tendinopathy in children and adolescents has not been widely studied. This systematic review found that tendinopathy is present in children and adolescents, and increases in prevalence with age up to 18 years. Male sex is significantly associated with tendinopathy in studies that report tendinopathy by tendon.