RESUMO
PURPOSE: Operative experience is at the core of general surgery residency, and recently operative volume requirements for graduating residents were increased. The ACGME has outlined 4 areas of required resident participation and documentation in order for a surgical case to be logged: determination or confirmation of the diagnosis, provision of preoperative care, selection and accomplishment of the operative procedure, and direction of the postoperative care. The purpose of this study was to examine whether general surgery residents are currently meeting the required care participation documentation standard and to examine the effect of acute care vs. elective cases on documentation. METHODS: The operative case logs of 7 PGY-3 and 7 PGY-5 general surgery residents from March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to the electronic medical record (EMR) to verify documentation of resident participation in each of the 4 required areas. Chart review was also utilized to classify cases as either acute care or elective. RESULTS: A total of 339 cases were reviewed (159 PGY-3 and 180 PGY-5). Of these, 251 cases were classified as elective and 88 were classified as acute care. Overall, documentation of comprehensive care (participation in all four required areas) was found for 44% of cases, with residents reporting participation in a higher percentage of comprehensive care (all 4 domains completed) than was actually documented in the EMR (71.9% vs. 44.4%, t[13] = 2.57, p = 0.023, d = 1.13). Comprehensive care was documented more frequently in elective cases than acute care cases (49.7% vs. 38.3%), and there was less discrepancy between perceived and documented comprehensive care within elective cases (67% vs. 49.7%, t[13] = 1.17, p = 0.27) than acute care cases (80.9% vs. 38.3%, t[13] = 4.40, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite ACGME requirements, the majority of cases logged by general surgery residents do not have documentation by the operating resident in the EMR verifying provision of comprehensive care. Elective cases were more likely to meet documentation requirements than acute care cases, and we purport that this is possibly secondary to restricted work hours. We expect that other programs would find similar compliance in the documentation of comprehensive care. These results question whether the requirement for documenting comprehensive care to log a surgical case is practical in surgical residency training, particularly with an increasing demand for operative volume in the setting of limited work hours.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Documentação/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our novel teaching approach involved having students actively participate in an unsuccessful resuscitation of a high fidelity human patient simulator with a gun shot wound to the chest, followed immediately by breaking bad news (BBN) to a standardized patient wife (SPW) portrayed by an actress. METHODS: Brief education interventions to include viewing a brief video on the SPIKES protocol on how to break bad news, a didactic lecture plus a demonstration, or both, was compared to no pretraining by dividing 553 students into four groups prior to their BBN to the SPW. The students then self-assessed their abilities, and were also evaluated by the SPW on 21 items related to appearance, communication skills, and emotional affect. All received cross-over training. RESULTS: Groups were equal in prior training (2 h) and belief that this was an important skill to be learned. Students rated the experience highly, and demonstrated marked improvement of self-assessed skills over baseline, which was maintained for the duration of the 12-wk clerkship. Additionally, students who received any of the above training prior to BBN were rated superior to those who had no training on several communication skills, and the observation of the video seemed to offer the most efficient way of teaching this skill in a time delimited curriculum. CONCLUSION: This novel approach was well received and resulted in improvement over baseline. Lessons learned from this study have enhanced our curricular approach to this vital component of medical education.
Assuntos
Educação Médica/métodos , Revelação da Verdade , Humanos , Simulação de Paciente , Desempenho de Papéis , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologiaRESUMO
Our novel approach to teaching Breaking Bad News (BBN) involves having students actively participate in an unsuccessful resuscitation (mannequin) followed immediately by BBN to a standardized patient wife (SPW) portrayed by an actress. Thirty-nine 3(rd) year medical students completed a questionnaire and then were divided as follows: Group 1 (n=21) received little to no training prior to speaking with the SPW. Group 2 (n =18) received a lecture and practiced for 1 hour in small groups prior to the resuscitation and BBN. Both groups self assessed ability to BBN (p<.0002 & p<.00001), and ability to have a plan (p<.0004 & p <.0003) improved significantly over base line with greater improvement in group 2. Group 2 (pre-trained) students were rated superior by SPW's in several key areas. This novel approach to teaching BBN to 3(rd) year medical students was well received by the students and resulted in marked improvement of self assessed skills over baseline.