Efficacy and safety of date palm leaf-based ointment for treatment of cutaneous warts: A pilot clinical trial.

Despite the considerably high prevalence of cutaneous warts, no optimally effective and safe treatment is available. Leaves of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.; Arecaceae) have long been used in Iran's folk medicine as a remedy for warts. To assess the state-of-the-art evidence on using P. dactylifera L. for warts, we conducted a systematic review using CINAHL (via EBSCO), Embase, Medline (via PubMed), ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science. We conducted an open-label uncontrolled pilot clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a proprietary topical date palm leaf-based ointment for the treatment of various types of nongenital warts. This study consisted of an 8-week treatment phase and a 4-week follow-up phase. The assessed outcomes included complete clearance, patient satisfaction (on Likert scale), and the occurrence of any adverse effect. The systematic review demonstrated that the effects of date palm on warts have not been scientifically studied. Thirty patients entered the study with a mean age of 29.5 years (SD = 14.04); among which 17 were female and 13 were male. The patients presented diverse types of warts: verruca vulgaris 15 (50%), plantar 9 (30%), plane 2 (7%), periungual 2 (7%), and warts at multiple sites 2 (7%). In this trial, 19 patients (63.3%) experienced complete clearance and 5 patients (16.6%) experienced partial clearance. Eight patients (26.67%) dropped out during the study. 21 (70%) patients were very satisfied (score on Likert scale = 5) while 1 (3.3%) patient with partial clearance was somewhat satisfied (score on Likert scale = 4). No adverse effect was observed. The results of this pilot study indicate that the date palm leaf-based ointment is a promising treatment whose efficacy and safety should be further investigated in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Efficacy of microneedling versus fractional Er:YAG laser in facial rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Microneedling and fractional lasers have been used in facial rejuvenation with acceptable results and low adverse effects. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of microneedling with fractional Er:YAG in facial skin rejuvenation. PATIENTS/METHODS: This study was planned as a split-face clinical trial. Volunteers were randomly allocated to receive three monthly treatments on each side of the face, one with fractional Er:YAG laser and one with microneedling. The assessments included investigating clinical outcomes by two blinded dermatologists accompanied by measuring skin biophysical characteristics including cutaneous resonance running time (CRRT) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Moreover, possible adverse effects, downtime, and patients' satisfaction were recorded at baseline, 1 month after each treatment, and 3 months after the last treatment session. The protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20160820029436N3). RESULTS: Of the 32 selected volunteers, 24 subjects completed the study. The clinical assessment showed a significant improvement of the face appearance along with a significant reduction in dyschromia, and periorbital wrinkling (P-value < .05), with both procedures without any considerable difference between two methods. Moreover, the patients showed substantial satisfaction with both modalities with no statistically significant difference. Mean TEWL and CRRT values also decreased significantly in both groups with no considerable difference. The downtime was significantly shorter in the microneedling-treated side. There were no long-lasting or severe adverse effects after treatment with both methods. CONCLUSION: Microneedling and fractional Er:YAG laser have comparable efficacy in facial rejuvenation, but little downtime of the former makes it preferable for many patients.