Prophylactic nimodipine treatment improves hearing outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery in men: a subgroup analysis of a randomized multicenter phase III trial.

A 2016 published randomized multicenter phase III trial of prophylactic nimodipine treatment in vestibular schwannoma surgery showed only a tendency for higher hearing preservation rates in the treatment group. Gender was not included in statistical analysis at that time. A retrospective analysis of the trial considering gender, preoperative hearing, and nimodipine treatment was performed. The treatment group received parenteral nimodipine from the day before surgery until the seventh postoperative day. The control group was not treated prophylactically. Cochlear nerve function was determined by pure-tone audiometry with speech discrimination preoperatively, during in-patient care, and 1 year after surgery and classified according to the Gardner-Robertson grading scale (GR). Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant effect for higher hearing preservation rates (pre- and postoperative GR 1-4) in 40 men comparing the treatment (n = 21) and the control (n = 19) groups (p = 0.028), but not in 54 women comparing 27 women in both groups (p = 0.077). The results were also statistically significant for preservation of postoperative hearing with pre- and postoperative GR 1-3 (p = 0.024). There were no differences in tumor sizes between the treatment and the control groups in men, whereas statistically significant larger tumors were observed in the female treatment group compared with the female control group. Prophylactic nimodipine is safe, and an effect for hearing preservation in 40 men with preoperative hearing ability of GR 1-4 was shown in this retrospective investigation. The imbalance in tumor size with larger tumors in females of the treatment group may falsely suggest a gender-related effect. Further investigations are recommended to clarify whether gender has impact on nimodipine's efficacy.

Does Nimodipine Interruption due to High Catecholamine Doses Lead to a Greater Incidence of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in the Setting of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the administration of nimodipine for the prevention of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, nimodipine can lead to significant drops in mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Catecholamines are then used to maintain them while nimodipine is reduced and/or held. There is no evidence that nimodipine retains its neuroprotective effect at lower doses. We aimed to investigate the role of nimodipine interruption in the setting of aSAH and its possible impact on the incidence of DCI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in patients with aSAH admitted to our center from January 2012 to October 2015. Nimodipine prophylaxis duration and dosage and the incidence of DCI were recorded. Bivariate correlation with Spearman's rho (ρ) and ordinal regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were included in the study. Of these, 165 (97.1%) received nimodipine prophylaxis starting on day 0. Nimodipine was interrupted in 85 of 165 (51.5%), whereas dose was reduced in 47 of 165 (28.5%); full dose was received by only 33 of 165 (20%). DCI was observed in 85 of 170 (50%). Nimodipine interruption correlated in a statistically significant way with a greater incidence of DCI (ρ = 0.431, P < 0.001); receiving full doses of nimodipine showed a statistically significant inverse correlation to DCI (ρ = -0.273, P < 0.001). Ordinal regression analysis revealed nimodipine interruption as a statistically significant independent predictor of DCI (odds ratio 0.194; 95% confidence interval 0.079-0.474, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals a greater incidence of DCI in patients with aSAH when nimodipine is interrupted.

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment and improvement in hearing outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a combined analysis of a randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial and its pilot study.

OBJECTIVE In clinical routines, neuroprotective strategies in neurosurgical interventions are still missing. A pilot study (n = 30) and an analogously performed Phase III trial (n = 112) pointed to a beneficial effect of prophylactic nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. Considering the small sample size, the data from both studies were pooled. METHODS The patients in both investigator-initiated studies were assigned to 2 groups. The treatment group (n = 70) received parenteral nimodipine (1-2 mg/hour) and HES (hematocrit 30%-35%) from the day before surgery until the 7th postoperative day. The control group (n = 72) was not treated prophylactically. Facial and cochlear nerve functions were documented preoperatively, during the inpatient care, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Pooled raw data were analyzed retrospectively. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed a significantly lower risk for hearing loss (Class D) 12 months after surgery in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.97; p = 0.04). After exclusion of patients with preoperative Class D hearing, this effect was more pronounced (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.83; p = 0.016). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for tumor size showed a 4 times lower risk for hearing loss in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.63; p = 0.003). Facial nerve function was not significantly improved with treatment. Apart from dose-dependent hypotension (p < 0.001), the study medication was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic nimodipine is safe and may be recommended in VS surgery to preserve hearing. Prophylactic neuroprotective treatment in surgeries in which nerves are at risk seems to be a novel and promising concept. Clinical trial registration no.: DRKS 00000328 ( https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/ ).

Prophylactic nimodipine treatment for cochlear and facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a randomized multicenter Phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: A pilot study of prophylactic nimodipine and hydroxyethyl starch treatment showed a beneficial effect on facial and cochlear nerve preservation following vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. A prospective Phase III trial was undertaken to confirm these results. METHODS: An open-label, 2-arm, randomized parallel group and multicenter Phase III trial with blinded expert review was performed and included 112 patients who underwent VS surgery between January 2010 and February 2013 at 7 departments of neurosurgery to investigate the efficacy and safety of the prophylaxis. The surgery was performed after the patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups using online randomization. The treatment group (n = 56) received parenteral nimodipine (1-2 mg/hr) and hydroxyethyl starch (hematocrit 30%-35%) from the day before surgery until the 7th postoperative day. The control group (n = 56) was not treated prophylactically. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant effects of the treatment on either preservation of facial nerve function (35 [67.3%] of 52 [treatment group] compared with 34 [72.3%] of 47 [control group]) (p = 0.745) or hearing preservation (11 [23.4%] of 47 [treatment group] compared with 15 [31.2%] of 48 [control group]) (p = 0.530) 12 months after surgery. Since tumor sizes were significantly larger in the treatment group than in the control group, logistic regression analysis was required. The risk for deterioration of facial nerve function was adjusted nearly the same in both groups (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.34-3.43], p = 0.91). In contrast, the risk for postoperative hearing loss was adjusted 2 times lower in the treatment group compared with the control group (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.18-1.30], p = 0.15). Apart from dose-dependent hypotension (p < 0.001), no clinically relevant adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant effects of the treatment. Despite the width of the confidence intervals, the odds ratios may suggest but do not prove a clinically relevant effect of the safe study medication on the preservation of cochlear nerve function after VS surgery. Further study is needed before prophylactic nimodipine can be recommended in VS surgery.

Addition of intravenous N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists to local fibrinolytic therapy for the optimal treatment of experimental intracerebral hemorrhages.

OBJECT: Fibrinolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is considered a treatment option in patients with deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Nevertheless, the results of animal experiments have shown that tPA exerts pleiotropic actions in the brain, including regulation of vasoactivity, amplification of calcium conductance by cleavage of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit, and activation of metalloproteinases, which increase excitotoxicity, damage the blood-brain barrier, and worsen edema. The authors investigated whether the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 can be used as an adjuvant therapy in combination with rtPA to attenuate the unfavorable delayed edema formation and inflammation observed following rtPA therapy in an experimental porcine model of ICH. METHODS: Twenty pigs were used in this study; MK801 (0.3 mg/kg) was administered to each pig intravenously immediately after hematoma induction and on the 1st and 3rd day after hematoma induction. Ten of the 20 pigs were randomly assigned to fibrinolytic therapy with rtPA (MK801-tPA group), whereas in the remaining 10 control animals (MK801 group) the hematomas were allowed to follow their natural courses of resorption. The extent of edema formation was evaluated using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging volumetry on Days 0, 4, and 10 after hematoma induction and was compared with histopathological changes found at necropsy. The mean edema volumes in these two groups were also compared with that in the group of nine pigs examined in a preceding experimental series, in which the animals' hematomas were only treated with rtPA (tPA group). In the 10 animals in the MK801-tPA group, the mean perihematoma edema volume on MR images had not significantly increased by Day 4 (p < 0.08) or Day 10 (p < 0.35) after hematoma induction. In the 10 animals in the MK801 group, the increase in mean perifocal edema size was significant after 4 days (p < 0.001) and nonsignificant after 10 days (p < 0.09). In the nine animals in the tPA group, the mean edema volume significantly increased by Days 4 (p < 0.002) and 10 (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As suggested by the reduction in delayed edema volume and the inflammatory response, MK801 modifies the neurotoxic properties of rtPA but not those of blood degradation products. Possibly, fibrinolytic therapy of ICH is more beneficial if combined with agents such as MK801.

On-demand deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a report on four cases.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for essential tremor (ET), but loss of efficacy due to tolerance can occur. Our objective was to evaluate if it is feasible to use DBS only on-demand and if this would prevent tolerance. We report on the effects of left-side thalamic DBS in 4 ET patients who were instructed to switch on stimulation only when using their right hand for motor tasks and were followed-up to 30 months after surgery. The patients were capable of using DBS only on-demand (DBS use of 22.0+/-13.5%/day). DBS led to a stable suppression of right arm tremor throughout the follow-up. No problems associated with tolerance such as tremor rebound or late therapy failure occurred. In comparison to publications stating that ET patients had been using DBS continuously during the daytime, the use of on-demand DBS saves battery life, which delays surgical replacement of the stimulator. Thus, on-demand DBS saves money, may help to prevent tolerance, and should be adopted for the long-term treatment of ET patients.

Minor inflammation after surgical evacuation compared with fibrinolytic therapy of experimental intracerebral hemorrhages.

OBJECTIVES: Toxic components released from the intracerebral blood clot, such as thrombin and hemoglobin, potentially trigger brain edema formation and therefore favor an early evacuation of the clot. Despite a significant reduction in hematoma size in our porcine model of hematoma induction by injecting autologous blood ICP-controlled into the right frontal white matter with subsequent fibrinolysis using recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and aspiration of the liquefied clot (n = 9), local rt-PA promoted delayed perihematomatous edema formation and invoked a substantial inflammatory reaction compared with controls (n = 11). METHODS: We therefore modified our formerly developed porcine model of intracerebral hemorrhage in removing the hematoma by open craniotomy and suction of the clot in seven animals. The residual hematoma size and extent of perifocal edema were evaluated over 10 days on planimetry of the MRI data, and correlated to the histopathological changes of edema and inflammation found at autopsy. RESULTS: The edema volume on day 4 was significantly less in the surgical group compared with the lysis group (p < 0.03). On day 10, however, the difference in edema size was not statistically significant compared with the lysis group (p < 0.07) and the control group (p < 0.09). The inflammatory response was minor compared with the lysis and control group. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, despite a significant reduction in hematoma size by surgical removal of the clot, only the inflammatory response, but not the extent of delayed edema can be positively influenced.