Risk of occurrence of electromagnetic interference from the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the sensing function of implantable defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an established method for pain relief. But electrical TENS currents are also a source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Thus, TENS is considered to be contraindicated in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients. However, data might be outdated due to considerable advances in ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) filtering and noise protection algorithm technologies. The aim of this pilot safety study was to re-evaluate the safety of TENS in patients with modern ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients equipped with 55 different models of ICD/CRT with defibrillators from 4 manufacturers underwent a standardized test protocol including TENS at the cervical spine and the thorax, at 2 stimulation modes-high-frequency TENS (80 Hz) and burst-mode TENS (2 Hz). Potential interference monitoring included continuous documentation of ECG Lead II, intracardiac electrograms and the marker channel. Electromagnetic interference was detected in 17 of 107 patients (15.9%). Most frequent were: interpretations as a premature ventricular beats (VS/S) in 15 patients (14%), noise reversion in 5 (4.6%) which resulted in temporary asynchronous pacing in 3 (2.8%), interpretation as ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 2 (1.9%), and premature atrial beat in 2 (1.9%) patients. Electromagnetic interference occurrence was influenced by position (chest, P < 0.01), higher current intensity (P < 0.01), and manufacturer (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Overall, only intermittent and minor EMI were detected. Prior to the use of TENS in patients with ICDs, they should undergo testing under the supervision of a cardiac device specialist.

[A series of cases--too old for a pacemaker?]. / Eine Case Serie--Zu alt für einen Schrittmacher?

We report three patients with an age above 90 years presented with symptomatic bradycardia and higher grade AV block in our clinic. The oldest patient was 100 years. All three patients could be supplied safely and without complications with a dual chamber pacemaker. Our case series shows that a dual chamber pacemaker implantation is safe and feasible in patients in very advanced age. A surgical management with local anesthetic (lidocaine), fentanyl and midazolam in individual cases is possible. This and a short hospital stay reduce the risk of delirium. It is a group of patients, which will increase in the future and requires more intensive care than the standard pacemaker patient.

Atrial standstill in sinus node disease due to extensive atrial fibrosis: impact on dual chamber pacemaker implantation.

AIMS: Atrial standstill is characterized by the absence of atrial activity. We report about a series of cases, in which conventional atrial pacemaker lead implantation in patients with symptomatic sinus node disease failed due to lack of excitable right atrial tissue, thus, prompting the diagnosis of atrial standstill. We hypothesized that mapping of the atria with subsequent identification of myocardium still amenable to atrial pacing would allow dual chamber pacemaker implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In four patients, atrial lead implantation failed. In these patients, spontaneous or fibrillatory electrical activity was absent but the atria could not be captured despite high stimulation voltages at conventional atrial sites. We suspected partial or complete atrial standstill and subsequently confirmed this hypothesis by conventional (n = 1) or electroanatomical mapping (n = 3). Areas of fibrotic tissue were present in all patients as identified by lack of spontaneous electrical activity and inability of local electrical capture via the mapping catheter. Surviving atrial tissue, which could be electrically captured with subsequent conduction of activity to the atrioventricular (AV) node, was present in three patients. Successful targeted atrial lead implantation at these sites was achieved in all these patients. Isolated sinus node activity without conduction to the atria was found in one patient. CONCLUSION: Partial atrial standstill may be present and prevent atrial lead implantation in patients with sinus node disease. In these patients, recognition of partial atrial standstill and identification of surviving muscular islets with connection to the AV node by mapping studies may still allow synchronous AV sequential pacing.