A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mud-bath therapy on knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) results from loss of cartilage in-tegrity in association with changes to the structure of the entire joint. Treatment of OA is based on different pharmaceutical and no phar-maceutical approaches and the latter include the use of spa-therapy. The biological effects of mud-bath therapy are mainly secondary to heat stimulation and to physic-chemical properties of mineral waters and mud-packs. Mud-bath therapy likely exerts its effects modulating several cytokines and other molecules involved in inflammation and cartilage degradation. Our aim was to perform an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the mud-bath therapy on knee osteoarthritis and briefly to discuss the mechanisms of action of this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE on PubMed for articles on knee OA and spa therapy published from 1995 through up to April 2019 was performed. Then, we checked the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to find additional references included up to April 2019. Articles were included if in accordance with the eligibility cri-teria. Sample size and effect sizes were processed with the MedCalc software package. RESULTS: Twenty one studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analysis. We examined WOMAC Index and VAS pain. We found significant improvements in function scores and painful symptoms after mud-bath therapy in patients with knee joint osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Spa therapy is a non-drug treatment modalities, non invasive, complication-free, and cost-effective alternative modality for the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. It cannot substitute for conventional therapy but can integrated or alternated to it. Treatment with mud-bath therapy may relieve pain, stiffness and improve functio-nal status in patients with knee OA.

Clinical, pathological and immunohistochemical effects of arsenical-ferruginous spa waters on mild-to-moderate psoriatic lesions: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

Thermalism and spa treatments are traditionally considered effective in a number of dermatologic inflammatory conditions, yet there is scarce evidence about spring water effectiveness on psoriasis in a daily setting. We enrolled 34 patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-contralaterally-controlled trial, to evaluate Levico and Vetriolo arsenical-ferruginous water effectiveness on psoriatic lesions by daily 20-minute wet packing for 12 consecutive days. Clinical, histopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters were considered. A statistically significant difference between spa water-treated lesions and placebo-treated lesions in the same patients was demonstrated for histopathologic and immunohistochemical parameters. Since iron ions have an antiproliferative effect on epithelia, and magnesium ions have an anti-inflammatory effect, Levico and Vetriolo water effectiveness on psoriasis could be addressed to their content of these ions.

Capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of preoperative treatment with capecitabine in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with potentially resectable T3, N0-2 (87%) and T4, N0-2 (13%) rectal cancer were treated with capecitabine (825 mg/m2, twice daily for 7 days/week) and concomitant RT (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Patients underwent surgery after 6-8 weeks followed, upon physician's indications, by 4-months adjuvant capecitabine. The primary end point was to determine the rate of pathologic complete response. Secondary end points were to assess the rate of clinical response and the safety profile. RESULTS: All patients but two completed the RT programme and 47 (89%) received 81%-100% of the capecitabine dose (100% of dose in 72% patients, 81%-95% in 17% patients and 48%-74% in 11% of patients). No patient had grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in six patients (11%) and consisted mainly of leucopenia (4%) and hand-foot syndrome (4%). Mild or moderate toxicity was common and included leucopenia (72%), diarrhea (40%), proctitis (34%) and skin toxicity (20%). The overall clinical response rate was 58% and the downstaging rate was 57%, with a pathologic complete response rate of 24%. Among 34 patients with low-lying tumors (

Adjuvant sequential methotrexate --> 5-fluorouracil vs 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in radically resected stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer.

The aim of the study was to determine whether modulation of 5-fluorouracil (FU) by methotrexate (MTX) improves survival compared to FU+6-s-leucovorin (LV) following potentially curative resection of stage II and III colon cancer. Within 8 weeks from surgery, 1945 patients with stage III (44%) or high-risk stage II (55%) colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either 6 monthly cycles of FU 370 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus preceded by LV 100 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5, or 6 monthly cycles of sequential MTX 200 mg m(-2) i.v. days 1 and 15 and FU 600 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 2 and 16 followed by LV rescue (15 mg given p.o. q 6 h x 6 doses). Levamisole 50 mg p.o. t.i.d. on days 1-3, every 14 days for 6 months, was planned to be given in both arms. After a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 568 patients have relapsed and 403 have died. Survival was similar with MTX --> FU and FU+LV (77 vs 77% at 5 years; P = 0.90), as were 5-year disease-free survivals (67 vs 63%; P = 0.44). Efficacy results were similar for both stage III and II patients. There were two toxic deaths, two in the MTX --> FU arm (0.2%) and zero in the control arm. We conclude that biochemical modulation of FU with LV or with MTX produces similar results in the adjuvant setting of colon cancer.

Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has proven efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although the optimal dosage and administration schedule are still unclear. This phase II trial investigated the tolerability and activity of weekly oxaliplatin, high-dose infusional 5-FU and LV in pretreated patients with metastatic CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received weekly courses of i.v. oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-h infusion), LV 100 mg/m2 (1-h infusion) and 5-FU 2100 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NCI-CTC criteria were used for assessment of side-effects (at each cycle) and WHO criteria for assessment of tumour response (every 8 cycles). For descriptive purposes, time to progression, overall survival and duration of objective response were also calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and received a total of 606 cycles (median 13/patient, range 4-33), and 70% of courses (421/606) were delivered at 100% of the planned dose. The most frequent side-effects were gastrointestinal and neurological and incidence rates were: diarrhoea 66% (grade III: 29%), nausea/vomiting 54%, neurotoxicity 34% (grade III: 2%), fatigue 27%, mucositis 22%, leucopenia 14%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. Objective response rates were: partial response 23% (10 patients), stable disease 59% (26) and progressive disease 11% (5). Median time to progression was 7 months, overall survival 13 months and the duration of partial response and stable disease were 9 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that this regimen has a favourable tolerability profile and is an active combination in the pretreated metastatic CRC patient, deserving further evaluation in phase III trials.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colon cancer: randomized multicenter trial of the Italian National Intergroup of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer (INTACC).

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the addition of leucovorin to the combination 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole prolongs disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with radically resected colon cancer (Dukes' B(2-3) and C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (1703) were accrued between March 1992 and February 1995 in a large-scale clinical trial within five Italian cooperative groups. After stratification for center, patients were randomized as follows: arm A, 5-fluorouracil [450 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on days 1-5] and levamisole (150 mg orally for 3 days, every 14 days for 6 months) versus arm B, 6-S-leucovorin (100 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5) followed by 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1-5), plus levamisole (as arm A), every 4 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.4 years no significant difference was seen for either disease-free survival (58% versus 60%, not significant) or 5-year overall survival (68% versus 71%, not significant), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity (World Health Organization grade 3/4) was more frequent in arm B (8% versus 18%, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the schedules used showed no statistically significant differences in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.

Impact of two different dose-intensity chemotherapy regimens on psychological distress in early breast cancer patients.

In order to improve outcome, new, often more toxic chemotherapy regimens are continuously investigated in early breast cancer patients. Because the expected survival improvement is small, the possible increase in the negative effects of the new treatments should be carefully evaluated. Negative effects are represented not only by acute and chronic toxicity, but also by the adverse psychological impact of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on patient-reported psychological distress of an increase in the dose-intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with a standard regimen. Psychological distress was evaluated at baseline, during chemotherapy and after 6 and 12 months in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase III multicentre study comparing the standard adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil every 21 days (CEF21) with the same chemotherapy given every 14 days (CEF14). 392 patients were randomised in participating centres, and 363 were evaluable for this study. Overall, 1095 out of 1446 expected questionnaires (75.7%) were collected and evaluable. At baseline, the mean scores of psychological distress were similar in the two arms. During chemotherapy, a significantly higher psychological distress was observed in the CEF14 compared with the CEF21 arm (32.3 +/- 1.3 versus 27.6 +/- 1.3; P=0.009), as well as a higher cumulative incidence of anaemia, mucositis, diarrhoea, alopecia, bone pain and fatigue was observed in the CEF14 arm. In multivariate analyses, mucositis (P=0.01), asthenia (P=0.059), and CEF14 treatment (P=0.054) were independently associated with a higher psychological distress. After 6 months, psychological distress was again similar in the two arms and significantly lower when compared with baseline within each arm. A dose-intensive adjuvant regimen induces a higher, although transient, psychological distress in early breast cancer patients. Final results of the randomised trial will indicate whether such higher adverse effects of the dose-intensive regimen are counterbalanced by a higher efficacy of the experimental treatment in terms of survival.

Intensified chemotherapy supported by DMSO-free peripheral blood progenitor cells in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The majority of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)-related complications results from bone marrow aplasia, but the graft infusion per se may cause adverse reactions due to the injection of both dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and cell lysis products. We evaluated the feasibility of a two-step chemotherapy regimen with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in association with a novel procedure to remove DMSO and products of cell lysis from the cryopreserved cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage III and IV breast cancer patients received induction chemotherapy with three cycles of CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2) followed by three cycles of HDC consisting of escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (dose range 1200 3000 mg/m2) and carboplatin (dose range 600-1000 mg/m2), supported by DMSO-free PBPC reinfusion. DMSO was removed by a washing/enzymatic digestion procedure. RESULTS: Twenty patients received induction chemotherapy and eighteen completed the entire chemotherapy program; a total of fifty-four cycles of HDC were administered. Dose limiting toxicity of HDC was long-lasting grade 4 neutropenia associated with documented infection. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was cyclophosphamide 3000 mg/m2 and carboplatin 600 mg/m2. No side effects related to PBPC reinfusion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed two-step chemotherapy regimen, associated with a novel washing/enzymatic digestion procedure, is feasible in advanced breast cancer patients in the absence of complications related to the specific toxicity of PBPC reinfusion.

Activity of high dose 24 hour 5-fluorouracil infusion plus L-leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (L-LV) in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to produce a highly significant benefit over single-agent 5-FU in terms of tumor response rate, but this advantage does not translate into an evident improvement of overall survival. To improve the clinical efficacy of the 5-FU plus L-LV regimen a phase II study of weekly 24-hour high-dose 5-FU infusion with L-LV was undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy advanced colorectal patients were enrolled and treated by a weekly outpatient combination regimen according to the following schedule: L-LV 100 mg/sqm by 4 hours i.v. infusion followed by 5-FU 2600 mg/sqm over a 24 hours infusion combined with a fixed dose of oral L-LV (50 mg) every 4 hours for 5 times. Forty-four pts did not receive any previous CT and 26 pts were pretreated with fluoropyrimidines. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate (OR) was 35.3%; 7 CR and 11 PR (42.8% OR) were observed in the group of untreated pts, and 6 PR (23% OR) were reported among previously treated pts. Major side effects were represented by diarrhoea (grade III: 26%, grade IV: 1%), hand-foot syndrome (grade III: 4%, grade IV: 1%) and mucositis (grade III: 4%); however, this did not significantly influence the therapeutic programme. Median 5-FU dose intensity was 100% and 80% at 4 weeks, 87% and 75% at 8 weeks in untreated and pretreated pts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: L-Leucovorin modulation of weekly short-term continuous infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil appeared a well-tolerated outpatient regimen; it demonstrated a high activity in advanced colorectal cancer, both in untreated pts and in pts resistant to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Treatment with cisplatin and fluorouracil alternating with radiation favourably affects prognosis of inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a multivariate analysis on 273 patients.

PURPOSE: The goal of the present analyses is to assess the association between different therapeutic approaches and both the probability of achieving a complete response and the risk of death in patients with stage III-IV, inoperable, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1983 and December 1990, 273 patients with stage III-IV, previously untreated, unresectable SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx, were included into two consecutive randomized multi-institutional trials (HN-7 and HN-8 protocols) coordinated by the National Institute for Cancer Research (NICR) of Genoa. The HN-7 protocol compared neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of vinblastine, 6 mg/m2 i.v. followed by bleomycin, 30 IU i.m. six hours later, day 1; methotrexate, 200 mg i.v., day 2; leucovorin, 45 mg orally, day 3) (VBM) followed by standard radiotherapy (70-75 Gy in 7-8 weeks) (55 patients) to alternating chemoradiotherapy based on four cycles of the same chemotherapy alternated with three splits of radiation, 20 Gy each (61 patients). In the HN-8 protocol standard radiotherapy (77 patients) was compared to the same alternating program as the one used in the previous protocol but employing cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, bolus, both given for five consecutive days (CF) instead of VBM (80 patients). A single database was created with the patients on the two protocols. Age at diagnosis, gender, site of the primary tumor, size of the primary, nodal involvement, performance status and treatment approach were analyzed by the multiple logistic regression model and the Cox regression method. The analyses were repeated including the treating institutions as a covariate (coordinating center versus others). RESULTS: The multiple logistic regression analysis indicates that treatment (alternating more so than others, regardless of the chemotherapy regimen used) (P = 0.0001) is more likely to be associated with complete response. In addition, size of the primary tumor (P = 0.004), nodal involvement (P = 0.02) and performance status (P = 0.009) are prognostic variables affecting the probability of achieving a complete response. The Cox regression analysis indicates that treatment, performance status, size of the primary tumor, nodal involvement and, marginally, site of the primary tumor, are independent prognostic variables affecting the risk of death. When the radiation-alone therapy is adopted as the reference treatment, the relative risk of death is 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.84) for alternating CF and radiation, 0.79 (95% CI 0.53-1.16) for alternating VBM and radiation and 1.30 (95% CI 0.89-1.92) for sequential VBM and radiation. When the treating institution is included in the model, a 34% increased risk of death (P = 0.04) is observed for patients treated outside the coordinating center. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients with advanced, unresectable SCC-HN, treatment with cisplatin and fluorouracil alternating with radiation was associated with a more favourable prognosis. The role of the treating institution in the modulation of the treatment outcomes was also relevant.

Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of erythropoietin in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

PURPOSE: Although erythropoietin (EPO) is known to be useful in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia, few data are available on its potential preventive role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of EPO in preventing the development of clinically significant anemia in patients treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing accelerated adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive EPO 150 U/kg three times a week or no additional treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of six cycles of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF) intravenously on day 1, every 2 weeks with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 5 microg/kg subcutaneously from day 4 to day 11. RESULTS: Throughout the six cycles of chemotherapy, EPO-treated patients maintained stable values of hemoglobin, whereas control patients developed a progressive anemia. At the end of chemotherapy, the mean (+/- SD) hemoglobin decrease in the control group was 3.05 g/dL (+/- 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 3.5), whereas in the EPO group it was 0.8 (+/- 1.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.4). Clinically significant anemia (hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL) occurred in 16 patients (52%; 95% CI, 33 to 69) in the control arm and in no patient (0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14) in the EPO arm (P = .00001). CONCLUSION: EPO prevents anemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further trials are required to identify subsets of patients in which the preventive use of this drug could be cost-effective.

[Use of erythropoietin in oncology]. / Uso dell'eritropoietina in oncologia.

UNLABELLED: Anemia is a common complication observed in cancer patients. Its etiology is multifactorial and its severity depends on patient characteristics, type and stage of neoplasia, type of used chemotherapy. Erythropoietin can be effective by counteracting two of the main causes of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: 1. Myelosuppression induced by chemotherapy. Almost all cytotoxic drugs induce this effect. In this circumstance erythropoietin can be effective by accelerating the recovery of the erythroid compartment spared by chemotherapy. For this effect, higher than physiologically normal levels of erythropoietin are required. 2. Endogenous erythropoietin deficiency secondary to renal impairment. Renal impairment is primarily induced by cisplatin and leads to a deficient renal production of erythropoietin. In this case, erythropoietin administration can be considered as a hormone replacement therapy. Possible indications for the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients are the following: 1. Prevention of anemia; 2. Treatment of anemia induced by either high dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or standard dose chemotherapy. The preventive use of erythropoietin is still under investigation. Two randomized studies reported the erythropoietin ability to prevent the anemia development. Further trials are required to identify subsets of patients in which the preventive use of the drug could be cost-effective. One of the causes of anemia after allogeneic BMT is the endogenous production of erythropoietin inappropriately low for the degree of anemia. On the contrary, after autologous BMT the erythropoietin response to anemia is appropriate. Phase III randomized studies showed the efficacy of erythropoietin in the treatment of anemia after allogeneic but not after autologous BMT. After standard dose chemotherapy, phase III randomized studies showed that erythropoietin is able to correct anemia in 60-80% of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy and in nearly 40% of patients receiving chemotherapy without platinum. The correction of anemia leads to a significant reduction in transfusion requirement. In solid tumors erythropoietin is commonly administered at the schedule of 150 U/Kg subcutaneously three times per week. Normal levels of current iron supply should be guaranteed by oral iron support during erythropoietin treatment. Because the response to erythropoietin occurs after a median time of 5 weeks, it is necessary to start erythropoietin therapy at an hemoglobin level higher that that triggering transfusion. Various parameters, at baseline or after 2-4 weeks of erythropoietin therapy, have been evaluated as predictors of response. However, other parameters should be studied to identify stronger predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Erythropoietin treatment is recommended after allogeneic BMT. Erythropoietin is effective in 60-80% of anemic patients receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy and in approximately 40% of patients receiving chemotherapy without platinum. The preventive use of erythropoietin is still under investigation. Further studies should identify subsets of patients and types of chemotherapy in which the prevention of anemia could be cost/effective.

Hand-foot syndrome induced by high-dose, short-term, continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion.

The aim of this study was to examine in detail the incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (L-LV) chemotherapy. 70 advanced colorectal cancer patients (pts) were given weekly 24 h continuous 5-FU (2600 mg/m2) infusion plus L-LV (100 mg/m2 i.v., 50 mg orally). The toxicity, in particular HFS, was analysed, correlated to the main pts characteristics and compared to the other observed side-effects. HFS occurred in 36/70 pts (51%): grade 1 in 16 pts, grade 2 in 16 pts, grade 3 in 3 pts and grade 4 in 1 pt. It occurred after a median number of nine courses. In one case, chemotherapy was interrupted for this toxicity, and in another 5 pts drug reduction and/or treatment delay were undertaken. Changes in the therapeutic programme because of diarrhoea or mucositis were more frequent, even though these toxicities were generally mild in our series of pts. HFS was significantly correlated to previous exposure to chemotherapy (P = 0.00003). HFS was a frequent side-effect of high-dose, short-term continuous 5-FU infusion, but the impact on quality of life of pts and on the correct delivery of the planned chemotherapy was limited.

Amenorrhea induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: prognostic role and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: The role of amenorrhea induced by chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer is very controversial. Analyses by various authors of the effect of drug-induced amenorrhea (DIA) on treatment outcome have yielded conflicting results. In order to gain insight into the role of DIA, we reviewed all published data addressing the issue of DIA as a prognostic factor. METHODS: Computerised and manual searches were conducted of relevant studies published from 1966 to 1995. RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 3929 patients were selected. In two papers, the prognostic role of DIA was analysed in three and two different groups of patients, respectively. Overall, 16 groups of patients were evaluated. With 12 groups, a higher disease free survival was observed in patients developing DIA compared to those who did not. This difference was statistically significant in eight groups. Data on overall survival, reported in only five studies, indicated that it was always improved in patients who became amenorrheic. CONCLUSIONS: Available data on the role of DIA support its importance as a favorable prognostic factor for early breast cancer patients. However, due to the possible biases of this type of evaluation, this result should be interpreted with caution.

Five-year update of a randomized trial of alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In 1992, we reported the first analysis of a randomized trial comparing alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The results of that 3-year analysis indicated that the combined treatment had superior efficacy. PURPOSE: After an additional 2 years of follow-up, we again compared the efficacy of the two treatment regimens, with attention paid to differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy (four courses of cisplatin [20 mg/m2] and fluorouracil [200 mg/m2], given daily for 5 consecutive days during weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) plus radiotherapy (three courses of 20 Gy each, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day during weeks 2-3, 5-6, and 8-9) or radiotherapy alone (70 Gy total dose, given in fractions of 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week). Eighty patients received the combined therapy, and 77 were treated with radiotherapy alone. Responses, failures, and toxic effects associated with the two treatment regimens were compared. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method; the logrank test was used to compare survival parameters between the two patient groups. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: As reported previously, toxic effects associated with the combined therapy included both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-related effects; however, the incidence and severity of mucositis were nearly identical among patients in the two treatment arms. The combined treatment was associated with a statistically significant increase in the frequency of complete response (i.e., the disappearance of clinically detectable disease for at least 4 weeks) (43% for the combined-treatment group compared with 22% for the radiotherapy-only group; P = .037, chi-squared test). Five-year estimates of overall survival in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14%-40%) and 10% (95% CI = 4%-24%), respectively (P = .01, logrank test). The estimates of progression-free survival at 5 years in the combined-treatment group compared with the radiotherapy-only group were 21% (95% CI = 11%-37%) and 9% (95% CI = 3%-22%), respectively (P = .008, logrank test). Finally, the 5-year estimates of locoregional relapse-free survival were 64% (95% CI = 36%-84%) in the combined-treatment group and 32% (95% CI = 10%-65%) in the radiotherapy-only group (P = .038, logrank test). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The superiority of alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone in treating unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck seen at 3 years was confirmed at 5 years. However, additional trials must be conducted before considering the combined approach as standard therapy.

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on the activity and efficacy of first-line cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of previous adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response (OR) rates of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) as first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred twenty-six assessable metastatic breast cancer patients entered onto four consecutive randomized trials performed in our Institution and North-West Oncology Group (GONO) cooperative centers from 1983 to 1994. Patients received CEF-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy and were then evaluated. One hundred forty-four patients (44%) did not receive previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and 143 (44%) and 39 (12%) patients received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-based and anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: ORs to CEF chemotherapy were observed in 161 patients (49.4%). On univariate analysis, patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower probability of response than patients who did not: 43% versus 58% (P=.02). No difference between CMF-based (OR rate, 43%) and anthracycline-based (OR rate, 44%) adjuvant chemotherapy was observed. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=.005), bone as dominant metastatic site (P=.02), and previous hormonotherapy for metastatic disease (P=.005) were the most important factors in predicting a poor OR rate. The median PFS and OS times of the whole group were 9.8 and 17.9 months, respectively. Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a longer survival time (21.1 months) compared with patients previously treated with CMF-based (15.3 months) or anthracycline-based (15.8 months) adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant chemotherapy to be among the strongest prognostic factors associated with both a poor PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Previous adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects OR, PFS, and OS in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with the CEF regimen as first-line chemotherapy. No difference was observed between patients previously treated with CMF-based or anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in 125 patients homogeneously treated with a combined modality approach.

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and < or = 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

5-Fluorouracil plus 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in advanced pancreatic cancer. GLISP (Gruppo Ligure Studio Pancreas).

A total of 20 patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a phase II trial testing the activity of 5-fluorouracil given at 370 mg/m2 as a rapid i.v. bolus for 5 consecutive days, preceded by a rapid i.v. bolus of 200 mg/m2 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. The median age of the patients was 68 years and their median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 1. There were 7 patients with locally advanced disease and 13 with distant metastases (median, 2 sites). A median of 3 monthly cycles of treatment (range, 1-7) were given, with a corresponding dose intensity of 396 mg/m2 per week (86% of that planned). No complete response, 1 partial response, and 8 cases of disease stabilization were obtained. In general the regimen was well tolerated, with only 2 patients suffering from grade 3 stomatitis or diarrhea; the most common toxicity was nausea, which was experienced by almost 50% of the patients. The combination of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate plus 5-fluorouracil appears as little effective in this disease as 5-fluorouracil plus 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (leucovorin). It is suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil is so inactive as an "effector agent" against pancreatic cancer that its biochemical modulation with exogenous high-dose reduced folates cannot improve the therapeutic outcome produced by the fluoropyrimidine in these patients.