Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutrients ; 15(4)2023 Feb 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36839358

RESUMO

Over the years, there has been heightened interest in the health benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in reducing chronic diseases such as, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, type 2 diabetes, and acute macular degeneration (AMD). Due to inconsistent findings in the evidence, a review to critically examine the plethora of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in n-3 PUFA research was undertaken. The aim of this review is to study the highest level of evidence and to identify gaps in n-3 PUFA research. RCTs were originally designed for pharmaceutical research and later adopted for nutrition and food-related research. RCTs with active diseases assume that n-3 PUFA will have "drug" like effects, and this high expectation may have led to the inconsistent evidence in the literature. The inconsistency in the literature may be related to varying doses of n-3 PUFA, sources of n-3 PUFA (food vs. supplement; plant vs. marine), type of n-3 PUFA (mixture vs. purified), trial duration, population characteristics, sample size, and genetic variation. For future research, there is a need to distinguish between primary and secondary prevention, and to focus RCTs on primary prevention of chronic diseases by n-3 PUFA which is lacking in the literature.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(4): 423-436, 2021 02 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509399

RESUMO

This is an update of the previous 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of vitamin and mineral supplementation on cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. New randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were identified by searching the Cochrane library, Medline, and Embase, and data were analyzed using random effects models and classified by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. This updated review shows similar findings to the previous report for preventive benefits from both folic acid and B vitamins for stroke and has been graded with moderate quality. No effect was seen for the commonly used multivitamins, vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin C, and an increased risk was seen with niacin (with statin) for all-cause mortality. Conclusive evidence for the benefit of supplements across different dietary backgrounds, when the nutrient is sufficient, has not been demonstrated.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , Dieta Vegetariana , Humanos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Complexo Vitamínico B/uso terapêutico
3.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 112(6): 1642-1652, 2020 12 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33053149

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antioxidants have been promoted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction and for the prevention of cancer. Our preliminary analysis suggested that only when selenium was present were antioxidant mixtures associated with reduced all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of selenium supplementation alone and of antioxidant mixtures with or without selenium on the risk of CVD, cancer, and mortality. METHODS: We identified studies using the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase for potential CVD outcomes, cancer, and all-cause mortality following selenium supplementation alone or after antioxidant supplement mixtures with and without selenium up to June 5, 2020. RCTs of ≥24 wk were included and data were analyzed using random-effects models and classified by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: The meta-analysis identified 9423 studies, of which 43 were used in the final analysis. Overall, no association of selenium alone or antioxidants was seen with CVD and all-cause mortality. However, a decreased risk with antioxidant mixtures was seen for CVD mortality when selenium was part of the mix (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97; P = 0.02), with no association when selenium was absent. Similarly, when selenium was part of the antioxidant mixture, a decreased risk was seen for all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98; P = 0.02) as opposed to an increased risk when selenium was absent (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.13; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The addition of selenium should be considered for supplements containing antioxidant mixtures if they are to be associated with CVD and all-cause mortality risk reduction. This trial was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ as CRD42019138268.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Selênio/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Selênio/farmacologia
4.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 71(22): 2570-2584, 2018 06 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29852980

RESUMO

The authors identified individual randomized controlled trials from previous meta-analyses and additional searches, and then performed meta-analyses on cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. The authors assessed publications from 2012, both before and including the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force review. Their systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed generally moderate- or low-quality evidence for preventive benefits (folic acid for total cardiovascular disease, folic acid and B-vitamins for stroke), no effect (multivitamins, vitamins C, D, ß-carotene, calcium, and selenium), or increased risk (antioxidant mixtures and niacin [with a statin] for all-cause mortality). Conclusive evidence for the benefit of any supplement across all dietary backgrounds (including deficiency and sufficiency) was not demonstrated; therefore, any benefits seen must be balanced against possible risks.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/dietoterapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Dieta Saudável/tendências , Suplementos Nutricionais , Oligoelementos/administração & dosagem , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Dieta Saudável/métodos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Diabetes Care ; 37(7): 1806-14, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24929428

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite their independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) advantages, effects of α-linolenic acid (ALA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and low-glycemic-load (GL) diets have not been assessed in combination. We therefore determined the combined effect of ALA, MUFA, and low GL on glycemic control and CVD risk factors in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a parallel design, randomized trial wherein each 3-month treatment was conducted in a Canadian academic center between March 2011 and September 2012 and involved 141 participants with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6.5%-8.5% [48-69 mmol/mol]) treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents. Participants were provided with dietary advice on either a low-GL diet with ALA and MUFA given as a canola oil-enriched bread supplement (31 g canola oil per 2,000 kcal) (test) or a whole-grain diet with a whole-wheat bread supplement (control). The primary outcome was HbA1c change. Secondary outcomes included calculated Framingham CVD risk score and reactive hyperemia index (RHI) ratio. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of the test group and 90% of the control group completed the trial. The test diet reduction in HbA1c units of -0.47% (-5.15 mmol/mol) (95% CI -0.54% to -0.40% [-5.92 to -4.38 mmol/mol]) was greater than that for the control diet (-0.31% [-3.44 mmol/mol] [95% CI -0.38% to -0.25% (-4.17 to -2.71 mmol/mol)], P = 0.002), with the greatest benefit observed in those with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP). Greater reductions were seen in CVD risk score for the test diet, whereas the RHI ratio increased for the control diet. CONCLUSIONS: A canola oil-enriched low-GL diet improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, particularly in participants with raised SBP, whereas whole grains improved vascular reactivity.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/dietoterapia , Ácidos Graxos Monoinsaturados/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Canadá , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dieta , Grão Comestível , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óleo de Brassica napus , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA