Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 7(2): 250-253, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32022482

RESUMO

Riboflavin transporter deficiency (RTD) was recently characterized as a cause of genetic recessive childhood-onset motor neuron disease (MND) with hearing loss, formerly described as Brown-Vialetto-Van-Lear syndrome. We describe a 18-year-old woman with probable RTD mimicking juvenile Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) who presented with an inaugural respiratory failure and moderate distal four limbs weakness. Only one heterozygous SLC52A3 mutation was detected, but presence of a sub-clinical auditory neuropathy and dramatic improvement under high dose riboflavin argued for a RTD. As RTD probably has a larger phenotypic spectrum than expected, a high dose riboflavin trial should be discussed in young-onset MND.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Membrana Transportadoras/deficiência , Doença dos Neurônios Motores/tratamento farmacológico , Riboflavina/farmacologia , Complexo Vitamínico B/farmacologia , Adolescente , Idade de Início , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Paralisia Bulbar Progressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Riboflavina/administração & dosagem , Complexo Vitamínico B/administração & dosagem
3.
Lancet Neurol ; 15(12): 1217-1227, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27751553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with respiratory muscle weakness and respiratory failure. Non-invasive ventilation alleviates respiratory symptoms and prolongs life, but is a palliative intervention. Slowing the deterioration of diaphragm function before respiratory failure would be desirable. We aimed to assess whether early diaphragm pacing could slow down diaphragm deterioration and would therefore delay the need for non-invasive ventilation. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, controlled, triple-blind trial in patients with probable or definite ALS in 12 ALS centres in France. The main inclusion criterion was moderate respiratory involvement (forced vital capacity 60-80% predicted). Other key eligibility criteria were age older than 18 years and bilateral responses of the diaphragm to diagnostic phrenic stimulation. All patients were operated laparoscopically and received phrenic stimulators. Clinicians randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive either active or sham stimulation with a central web-based randomisation system (computer-generated list). Investigators, patients, and an external outcome allocation committee were masked to treatment. The primary outcome was non-invasive ventilation-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01583088. FINDINGS: Between Sept 27, 2012, and July 8, 2015, 74 participants were randomly assigned to receive either active (n=37) or sham (n=37) stimulation. On July 16, 2015, an unplanned masked analysis was done after another trial showed excess mortality with diaphragm pacing in patients with hypoventilation (DiPALS, ISRCTN 53817913). In view of this finding, we analysed mortality in our study and found excess mortality (death from any cause) in our active stimulation group. We therefore terminated the study on July, 16, 2015. Median non-invasive ventilation-free survival was 6·0 months (95% CI 3·6-8·7) in the active stimulation group versus 8·8 months (4·2-not reached) in the control (sham stimulation) group (hazard ratio 1·96 [95% CI 1·08-3·56], p=0·02). Serious adverse events (mainly capnothorax or pneumothorax, acute respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, and gastrostomy) were frequent (24 [65%] patients in the active stimulation group vs 22 [59%] patients in the control group). No treatment-related death was reported. INTERPRETATION: Early diaphragm pacing in patients with ALS and incipient respiratory involvement did not delay non-invasive ventilation and was associated with decreased survival. Diaphragm pacing is not indicated at the early stage of the ALS-related respiratory involvement. FUNDING: Hospital Program for Clinical Research, French Ministry of Health; French Patients' Association for ALS Research (Association pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique); and Thierry de Latran Foundation.


Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/terapia , Diafragma/fisiopatologia , Término Precoce de Ensaios Clínicos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Nervo Frênico , Insuficiência Respiratória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/complicações , Diafragma/inervação , Método Duplo-Cego , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Respiratórios , Respiração Artificial
4.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler ; 12(1): 26-32, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21091398

RESUMO

Cough can be impaired in ALS. This can result in peak cough flows (PCFs) too low for an adequate airway clearance (<270 l/mn). There are several cough assistance techniques that aim at a better elimination of airway secretions, but which are effective, especially in bulbar patients, is not known. We designed the present investigation to compare the PCFs produced by a range of manual and mechanical techniques in patients with ALS, in non-bulbar but also in bulbar patients. In the whole study population, PCFs ranged from 84 (35-118) l/mn for the spontaneous cough manoeuvre to 488 (243-605) l/min for the in/exsufflator (p = 0.0005). In the bulbar group, these values were 42 (35-130) l/min versus 436 (244-630) l/min, respectively (p = 0.008), and 89 (40-106) l/min versus 491 (192-580) l/min, respectively, in the non-bulbar group (p = 0.019). There was no statistically significant difference between the bulbar and the non-bulbar groups. The in/exsufflator was not always the best tool. We conclude that capacity of coughing efforts to produce efficient peak cough flows can be dramatically improved with different tools, even in patients with very severe bulbar symptoms and that it appears useful to test an array of techniques to optimally tailor cough improvement techniques to individual patients.


Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/complicações , Tosse , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Idoso , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/fisiopatologia , Gasometria , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Insuflação/instrumentação , Ventilação com Pressão Positiva Intermitente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Testes de Função Respiratória , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Músculos Respiratórios/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA