Efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of all available treatments for insomnia in the elderly: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Symptoms of insomnia are highly prevalent in the elderly. A significant number of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions exist, but, up-to-date, their comparative efficacy and safety has not been sufficiently assessed. METHODS: We integrated the randomized evidence from every available treatment for insomnia in the elderly (>65 years) by performing a network meta-analysis. Several electronic databases were searched up to May 25, 2019. The two primary outcomes were total sleep time and sleep quality. Data for other 6 efficacy and 8 safety outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three RCTs with 6832 participants (75 years old on average) were included, 43 of which examined the efficacy of one or more drugs. Ten RCTs examined the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions and were evaluated only with pairwise meta-analyses because they were disconnected from the network. The overall confidence in the evidence was very low primarily due to the small amount of data per comparison and their sparse connectedness. Several benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and z-drugs performed better in both primary outcomes, but few comparisons had data from more than one trial. The limited evidence on non-pharmacological interventions suggested that acupressure, auricular acupuncture, mindfulness-based stress reduction program, and tart cherry juice were better than their control interventions. Regarding safety, no clear differences were detected among interventions due to large uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient evidence exists on which intervention is more efficacious for elderly patients with insomnia. More RCTs, with longer duration, making more direct interventions among active treatments and presenting more outcomes are urgently needed.

Time independence of the prognostic impact of tumor cell detection in the bone marrow of primary breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Tumor cell detection (TCD) in bone marrow is an outstanding prognostic factor in breast cancer. There is only one other study that has investigated more than 300 patients with a median follow-up of more than 5 years (J. L. Mansi et al., Lancet, 354:197-202, 1999). We report data from 727 patients with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a prospective study, intraoperatively aspirated bone marrow was screened for micrometastatic cancer cells. We used an immunocytological method (monoclonal mucin antibody 2E11; the avidin-biotin complex method). RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the patients were TCD positive. Sixty percent of the patients with distant metastases were tumor cell positive (155 of 258 patients). Forty-nine percent of the patients with positive TCD developed distant metastases (155 of 315 patients). TCD was an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcome after a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. The prognostic impact of TCD and tumor size remains constant with the time, whereas the impact of grading and progesterone receptor on risk seems to decrease with longer follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: TCD remains an independent prognostic factor The impact of TCD does not change with longer follow-up time. TCD is a reliable prognostic factor and provides important information about the process of metastasis.