Efficacy of generic meropenem products in combination with colistin in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae experimental osteomyelitis.

Guidelines for the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections recommend a combination of two active agents, including meropenem if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤8 mg/L. The therapeutic equivalence of meropenem generics has been challenged. We compared the bactericidal activity of meropenem innovator (AstraZeneca) and four generic products (Actavis, Kabi, Mylan and Panpharma), both in vitro and in vivo, in association with colistin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed at 4 × MIC. An experimental model of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of a sclerosing agent followed by 2 × 108 CFU of K. pneumoniae KPC-99YC (meropenem MIC = 4 mg/L; colistin MIC = 1 mg/L). At 14 days after inoculation, treatment for 7 days started in seven groups of ≥10 rabbits, including a control group, a colistin group, and one group for each meropenem product (i.e. the innovator and four generics), in combination with colistin. In vitro, meropenem + colistin was bactericidal with no viable bacteria after 6 h, and this effect was similar with all meropenem products. In the osteomyelitis model, there was no significant difference between meropenem generics and the innovator when combined with colistin. Colistin-resistant strains were detected after treatment with colistin + meropenem innovator (n = 3) and generics (n = 3). The efficacy of four meropenem generics did not differ from the innovator in vitro and in an experimental rabbit model of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae osteomyelitis in terms of bactericidal activity and the emergence of resistance.

Comparison of six generic vancomycin products for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus experimental endocarditis in rabbits.

Concerns have recently emerged about the potency and the quality of generic vancomycin (VAN) products approved for use in humans, based on experiments in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. However, other animal models may be more appropriate to decipher the bactericidal activities of VAN generics in vivo and to predict their efficacy in humans. We aimed to compare the bactericidal activities of six generic VAN products currently used in France (Mylan and Sandoz), Spain (Hospira), Switzerland (Teva), and the United States (Akorn-Strides and American Pharmaceutical Products [APP]) in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis induced by 8 × 10(7) CFU of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain COL (VAN MIC, 1.5 µg/ml). In vitro, there were no significant differences in the time-kill curve studies performed with the six generic VAN products. Ten rabbits in each group were treated with intravenous (i.v.) VAN, 60 mg/kg of body weight twice a day (b.i.d.) for 4 days. Mean peak serum VAN levels, measured 45 min after the last injection, ranged from 35.5 (APP) to 45.9 µg/ml (Teva). Mean trough serum VAN levels, measured 12 h after the last injection, ranged from 2.3 (Hospira) to 9.2 (APP) µg/ml. All generic VAN products were superior to controls (no treatment) in terms of residual organisms in vegetations (P < 0.02 for each comparison) and in the spleen (P < 0.005 for each comparison). Pairwise comparisons of generic VAN products found no significant differences. In conclusion, a stringent MRSA endocarditis model found no significant differences in the bactericidal activities of six generic VAN products currently used in Europe and America.

Activity of LY333328 combined with gentamicin in vitro and in rabbit experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-susceptible or -resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

We investigated the activity of LY333328 alone and combined with gentamicin, both in vitro and in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis, against the susceptible strain Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 and its two glycopeptide-resistant transconjugants, BM4316 (VanA) and BM4275 (VanB). MICs of LY333328 and gentamicin were 2 and 16 microgram/ml, respectively, for the three strains. In vitro, LY333328 alone was bactericidal at 24 h against JH2-2 at a concentration of 2 microgram/ml and against BM4316 and BM4275 at a concentration of 30 microgram/ml. The combination of LY333328 and gentamicin (4 microgram/ml) was synergistic and bactericidal after 24 h of incubation against the three strains at LY333328 concentrations of 2 microgram/ml for JH2-2 and 8 microgram/ml for BM4275 and BM4316. The combination of LY333328 and gentamicin was the only regimen demonstrating in vitro bactericidal activity against BM4316. In vivo, intravenous treatment with LY333328 alone, providing peak and trough serum levels of 83.3 +/- 1.3 and 3.8 +/- 0.2 microgram/ml, respectively, was inactive against BM4316 and BM4275 and selected mutants resistant to LY333328 in half of the rabbits infected with the VanA-type strain (MICs, 8 to 20 microgram/ml). However, the LY333328-gentamicin combination was active against the three strains and prevented the emergence of mutants resistant to both components of the combination. We conclude that the LY333328-gentamicin combination might be of interest for the treatment of enterococcal infections, particularly against VanA-type strains.

Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium.

Using an experimental endocarditis model, we studied the activity of daptomycin used alone or in combination with gentamicin against an Enterococcus faecium strain that was highly resistant to glycopeptides and susceptible to gentamicin. In vitro, the MIC of daptomycin was 1 micrograms/ml. In vivo, daptomycin appeared to be effective only when it was used in a high-dose regimen, i.e., 12 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h (-2.5 log10 CFU/g versus controls; P < 0.05), particularly when it was combined with gentamicin (-5.0 log10 CFU/g versus controls; P < 0.01). Since the distribution of daptomycin into cardiac vegetations, as evaluated by autoradiography, appeared to be homogeneous, the poor in vivo activity of daptomycin was considered to be related to its high degree of protein binding, as suggested by killing curves studies. Since the MIC of teicoplanin for the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strain used in the study was only 64 micrograms/ml and since an in vitro synergy between teicoplanin at high dose and gentamicin was observed, a high-dose regimen of teicoplanin, i.e., 40 mg/kg every 12 h, was also assessed in vivo. This treatment provided marginal activity only when it was combined with gentamicin (-2.3 log10 CFU/g versus controls; P < 0.05). These results suggest that the levels of daptomycin or teicoplanin in serum required to cure experimental endocarditis caused by a highly glycopeptide-resistant strain of E. faecium would not be achievable in humans.

Efficacy of temafloxacin in experimental Streptococcus adjacens endocarditis and autoradiographic diffusion pattern of [14C]temafloxacin in cardiac vegetations.

Temafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, alone or in combination with tobramycin, was compared with penicillin, tobramycin, and their combination in the therapy of rabbits with endocarditis caused by Streptococcus adjacens GaDT, a new species of nutritionally variant streptococci. Animals were injected intramuscularly for 4 days with temafloxacin (50 mg/kg of body weight twice daily [b.i.d.]) alone or combined with tobramycin (12 mg/kg once daily), with procaine penicillin (150,000 U/kg b.i.d.) alone or combined with tobramycin (12 mg/kg once daily), or with tobramycin (12 mg/kg once daily) alone. Another group of animals was treated with a higher dose of temafloxacin (100 mg/kg b.i.d.). Temafloxacin, penicillin, and tobramycin MICs and MBCs were 1 and 2, 0.015 and 1, and 8 and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively. Time-kill curves showed that the addition of tobramycin to penicillin or temafloxacin increased the killing rate. In vivo, treatment with temafloxacin (50 and 100 mg/kg b.i.d.) alone reduced the bacterial counts in vegetations (3.9 +/- 0.9 and 3.1 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) compared with those in the vegetations of control animals (7.5 +/- 0.9 log10 CFU/g of vegetation). This result was similar to that obtained with penicillin alone (4.5 +/- 0.8 log10 CFU/g of vegetation). The combination of temafloxacin (50 mg/kg) and tobramycin was as effective as penicillin plus tobramycin (2.5 +/- 0.3 versus 2.3 +/- 0.4 log10 CFU/g of vegetation, respectively). The autoradiographic pattern of [14C]temafloxacin diffusion into infected cardiac vegetations was studied. Thirty minutes after the end of infusion of 250 microCi of [14C]temafloxacin, the [14C]temafloxacin was homogeneously distributed throughout the vegetations. These data support further evaluation of quinolones in experimental endocarditis.

Piperacillin, tazobactam, and gentamicin alone or combined in an endocarditis model of infection by a TEM-3-producing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae or its susceptible variant.

The efficacy of tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, in combination with piperacillin, was studied in vitro and in rabbit experimental endocarditis due to a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain (KpR) producing an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, TEM-3, or its nonproducing variant (KpS). In vitro, piperacillin was active against KpS (MIC = 4 micrograms/ml, MBC = 8 micrograms/ml with 10(7)-CFU/ml inoculum) but not against KpR (MIC = MBC = 256 micrograms/ml). Tazobactam (1 microgram/ml) restored the activity of piperacillin against KpR (MIC = 2 micrograms/ml, MBC = 4 micrograms/ml). Gentamicin was active against both strains (MIC = 0.25 and 0.5 micrograms/ml for KpS and KpR, respectively). The piperacillin-tazobactam-gentamicin combination was synergistic in vitro. The piperacillin/tazobactam ratio in plasma and in vegetations was always lower than the 4/1 injected dose ratio. In vivo, piperacillin (300 mg/kg of body weight four times a day [QID]) was active against KpS but not against KpR. Tazobactam (75 mg/kg QID) was able to restore the in vivo effect of piperacillin (300 mg/kg QID) against KpR (-3.0 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus that of controls). Gentamicin (4 mg/kg twice a day [BID]) was active against both strains. Compared with controls, the combination of gentamicin plus piperacillin against KpS (-5.6 log10 CFU/g of vegetation), and the gentamicin-piperacillin-tazobactam combination against KpR (-4.4 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) achieved the greatest decrease in bacterial counts in vegetations and were the only regimens that significantly increased the proportion of sterile vegetations. It is concluded that (i) tazobactam was able to restore the effect of piperacillin against a TEM-3 extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing strain of K. pneumoniae, both in vitro and in a severe experimental infection with high inoculum, when used in a 4/1 piperacillin/tazobactam dose ratio; (ii) gentamicin alone was effective because of the high peak/MBC ratio in plasma; (iii) piperacillin-tazobactam-gentamicin, probably because of the effect of gentamicin in reducing bacterial inoculum in vivo, as stressed by the results obtained by piperacillin-gentamicin against KpS, may be the most effective regimen against KpR.