ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19.

Antithrombotic agents reduce risk of thromboembolism in severely ill patients. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may realize additional benefits from heparins. Optimal dosing and timing of these treatments and benefits of other antithrombotic agents remain unclear. In October 2021, ISTH assembled an international panel of content experts, patient representatives, and a methodologist to develop recommendations on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for patients with COVID-19 in different clinical settings. We used the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology to assess level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Only recommendations with LOE A or B were included. Panelists agreed on 12 recommendations: three for non-hospitalized, five for non-critically ill hospitalized, three for critically ill hospitalized, and one for post-discharge patients. Two recommendations were based on high-quality evidence, the remainder on moderate-quality evidence. Among non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the panel gave a strong recommendation (a) for use of prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin (LMWH/UFH) (COR 1); (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic dose LMWH/UFH in preference to prophylactic dose (COR 1); but (c) against the addition of an antiplatelet agent (COR 3). Weak recommendations favored (a) sulodexide in non-hospitalized patients, (b) adding an antiplatelet agent to prophylactic LMWH/UFH in select critically ill, and (c) prophylactic rivaroxaban for select patients after discharge (all COR 2b). Recommendations in this guideline are based on high-/moderate-quality evidence available through March 2022. Focused updates will incorporate future evidence supporting changes to these recommendations.

Management of Severe Bleeding in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: An Observational Registry Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of prothrombin complex concentrates and the role of plasma concentration of anticoagulants in the management of bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants are still debated. Our aim was to describe management strategies and outcomes of severe bleeding events in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 732 patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban hospitalized for severe bleeding, included prospectively in the registry from June 2013 to November 2015. RESULTS: Bleeding was gastrointestinal or intracranial in 37% (212 of 732) and 24% (141 of 732) of the cases, respectively. Creatinine clearance was lower than 60 ml/min in 61% (449 of 732) of the cases. The plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulants was determined in 62% (452 of 732) of the cases and was lower than 50 ng/ml or higher than 400 ng/ml in 9.2% (41 of 452) and in 6.6% (30 of 452) of the cases, respectively. Activated or nonactivated prothrombin complex concentrates were administered in 38% of the cases (281 of 732). Mortality by day 30 was 14% (95% CI, 11 to 16). CONCLUSIONS: Management of severe bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants appears to be complex. The use of prothrombin complex concentrates differs depending on bleeding sites and direct oral anticoagulant plasma concentrations. Mortality differs according to bleeding sites and was similar to previous estimates.

Management of direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing elective surgeries and invasive procedures: Updated guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Hemostasis (GIHP) - September 2015.

Since 2011, data on patients exposed to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) while undergoing invasive procedures have accumulated. At the same time, an increased hemorrhagic risk during perioperative bridging anticoagulation without thrombotic risk reduction has been demonstrated. This has led the GIHP to update their guidelines published in 2011. For scheduled procedures at low bleeding risk, it is suggested that patients interrupt DOAs the night before irrespective of type of drug and to resume therapy six hours or more after the end of the invasive procedure. For invasive procedures at high bleeding risk, it is suggested to interrupt rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban three days before. Dabigatran should be interrupted according to the renal function, four days and five days if creatinine clearance is higher than 50mL/min and between 30 and 50mL/min, respectively. For invasive procedures at very high bleeding risk such as intracranial neurosurgery or neuraxial anesthesia, longer interruption times are suggested. Finally, bridging with parenteral anticoagulation and measurement of DOA concentrations can no longer routinely be used.

Risk factors for intraoperative hypertension in patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia.

PURPOSE: Hypertension is the most common operative medical complication in patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia. Our objective was to identify risk factors for high blood pressure requiring anaesthetic interventions. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective cataract operations were included in an observational prospective study preceded by a medical history description and physical examination. Intraoperative adverse medical events and type of management were recorded. RESULTS: We studied 514 elective cataract operations. The overall rate of hypertension during surgery was 10.4% (n=54). Independent risk factors for developing intraoperative hypertension were female sex (OR=3.8 [1.4-10.3]; P=0.01), age>80years (OR=4.5 [1.5-13.8]; P=0.01) and anxiety (OR=10.5 [4.1-27.0]; P<0.001). The incidence of hypertension was not significantly reduced by premedication (OR=0.5 [0.04-6.0]; P=0.6). There was no significant difference between patients with or without hypertension history in the rates of hypertensive events (OR=3.2 [0.6-15.5]; P=0.15). Management of hypertension or anxiety was similar in patients regardless of their past medical history or ASA risk class. CONCLUSIONS: A specific at-risk population may benefit from targeted preoperative interventions for reducing intraoperative anxiety and hypertension.

The effectiveness of platelet supplementation for the reversal of ticagrelor-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Management of ticagrelor-induced bleeding is challenging, as no antidote is currently available. Platelet transfusion, usually proposed to reverse antiplatelet drugs, has been suggested to be ineffective but few data are available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of platelet supplementation to restore platelet aggregation inhibited by ticagrelor. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: Blood samples were obtained from the French Blood Bank Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy blood donors. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood from healthy donors was spiked with ticagrelor or aspirin (used as a positive control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Platelet aggregation was investigated with impedance aggregometry on whole blood [expressed in ohms (V)] and light transmission aggregometry (expressed in %) on platelet-rich plasma using ADP or arachidonic acid as agonists for ticagrelor or aspirin, respectively. Platelet supplementation was defined as the addition of washed platelet suspension increasing at least 60% of whole blood platelet count. RESULTS: Ticagrelor (3.25 mM) inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with control either in whole blood (2 vs. 13 V, P < 0.05) or in platelet-rich plasma (15 vs. 75% P < 0.05). Aspirin (25 mM) inhibited arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (1 vs. 7.5 V, P < 0.05 in whole blood and 5 vs. 77.5%, P = 0.01 in platelet-rich plasma). Platelet supplementation completely restored arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (10 vs. 1 V, P = 0.008) and platelet-rich plasma (73 vs. 5%, P < 0.01) in aspirin-treated samples, whereas it failed to correct ADP-induced aggregation (2 vs. 2 V in whole blood and 13.5 vs. 15% in platelet-rich plasma, P > 0.05) in ticagrelor-treated samples. We also report a case of a ticagrelor-treated patient in whom platelet transfusion failed to restore ADP-induced platelet aggregation. CONCLUSION: Platelet supplementation restored platelet aggregation in aspirin-spiked but not in ticagrelor-spiked samples. These results do not support the use of platelet transfusion to reverse the effects of ticagrelor.

Favorable outcome of rivaroxaban-associated intracerebral hemorrhage reversed by 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: impact on thrombin generation.

The management of life-threatening bleeding associated with rivaroxaban remains a challenge for physicians due to the lack of evidence about clinically effective options for anticoagulation reversal. We report a favorable outcome in a patient receiving rivaroxaban prophylaxis, who developed a spontaneous subdural hematoma treated by a surgical evacuation and administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. Classical coagulation variables were associated with impaired thrombin generation. Reversal with prothrombin complex concentrates improved all thrombin generation measures. Thrombin generation tests may be suitable for assessing the clinical utility of reversal drugs on rivaroxaban-induced coagulopathy.

Evaluation of recombinant activated factor VII, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: As all anticoagulants, apixaban exposes to a bleeding risk, thus an effective way to reverse its effects is needed. Objectives were to study efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and fibrinogen concentrate (Fib) to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: After a dose-ranging study to assess the minimal amount of apixaban increasing bleeding, 63 anaesthetized rabbits were randomized into 5 groups: control (saline), apixaban (apixaban and saline), rFVIIa (apixaban and rFVIIa), PCC (apixaban and PCC) and fibrinogen (apixaban and Fib). The Folts model was applied: a stenosis and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis detected as cyclic flow reductions (CFRs) within 20 min. A number of parameters were recorded through ear immersion bleeding time (BT), clotting times (CT), thrombelastography, and thrombin generation time (TGT). Ultimately, a hepatosplenic section was performed to evaluate as primary endpoint the blood loss in 15 min. RESULTS: Apixaban increased blood loss (11.6 ± 3 g vs. 8.3 ± 3 g for control, p < 0.0003), lengthened BT, the prothrombin time (PT), thrombelastographic CT and decreased thrombin generation. Only rFVIIa reduced BT yet failed to improve blood loss. PCC and rFVIIa both shortened the PT, CT in thrombelastographic, and lag time in TGT. Fib improved clot firmness, enhanced thrombin generation but increased bleeding. Regarding safety, neither rFVIIa, PCC, nor Fib increased CFRs. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa, PCC, and Fib failed to reverse apixaban-induced bleeding. They only improved several laboratory parameters.

Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model.

BACKGROUND: As a potent anticoagulant agent, rivaroxaban exposes a risk of bleeding. An effective way to reverse its effects is needed. Objectives were to study efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to reverse the anticoagulant effect of an overdose of rivaroxaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: First, a dose-ranging study assessed the minimal rivaroxaban dose that increased bleeding. Then, 48 anesthetized and ventilated rabbits were randomized into four groups: control (saline), rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban and saline), rFVIIa (rivaroxaban and rFVIIa), and PCC (rivaroxaban and PCC). The Folts model was applied: a stenosis and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis, detected as cyclic flow reductions, which were recorded over 20 min. Then the following were measured: ear immersion bleeding time, clotting times, anti-Xa activity, thrombelastometric parameters, and thrombin generation test. Ultimately, a hepatosplenic section was performed and the total amount of blood loss after 15 min was evaluated as primary endpoint. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban increased blood loss (17 g [8-32] vs. 7 g [5-18] for control (median [range]), P = 0.0004), ear bleeding time, clotting times, thrombelastographic clotting time, and decreased thrombin generation. In contrast, rFVIIa decreased ear bleeding time (92 s [65-115] vs. 140 s [75-190], P < 0.02), but without efficacy on blood loss. PCC and rFVIIa decreased activated partial thromboplastin time as well as thrombelastographic clotting time. Regarding safety, neither rFVIIa nor PCC increased cyclic flow reductions. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa and PCC partially improved laboratory parameters, but did not reverse rivaroxaban induced-bleeding.

[New anticoagulants]. / Nouveaux anticoagulants.

The range of anticoagulants has been very active recently with the development of new compounds including injectable anti-Xa such as fondaparinux, and new oral drugs which can be divided into anti-IIa with dabigatran, and anti-Xa, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban still in the development stage. Others are coming forward. They are more convenient to use and do not require routine coagulation monitoring. However, several points need to be clarified and the place for each drug remains to be determined. In case of massive bleeding, management is unclear and none of these newer agents has a specific antidote that completely reverses its anticoagulant effect.

Two injections of erythropoietin correct moderate anemia in most patients awaiting orthopedic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to assess the number of erythropoietin (EPO) injections required to reach a hematocrit (Ht) of 40% in moderately anemic patients. The secondary objective was to compare this strategy with autologous blood donation (ABD) in elective orthopedic surgery in terms of red blood cell (RBC) production. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: 93 patients with a baseline Ht between 30 and 39% were randomized into two groups the day of the preoperative assessment. In the EPO group, patients received 40,000 UI/week sc until they reached a maximal Ht of 40%. In the ABD group, a RBC pack was collected every week as long as the Ht was above 33%. RESULTS: Two EPO injections were necessary to reach a 40% Ht in 63% of the patients. It was possible to collect two RBC packs in 45% of the patients in the ABD group. Volume of RBC production was significantly higher in the EPO group: 268 +/- 142 mL vs 141 +/- 129 (P = 0.0001). In the EPO group, Ht was significantly higher on days one and three after surgery and at discharge. The energy score was better in the EPO group. In the ABD group, 12.6% patients vs 6.5% in the EPO group received allogeneic transfusion (ns). CONCLUSION: Only two EPO injections were sufficient to reach a Ht of 40% in the majority of patients. Therefore, to improve cost/effectiveness, the number of EPO injections should be related to baseline Ht instead of the four injections recommended in the product monograph.