LGR5 rs17109924 is a predictive genetic biomarker for time to recurrence in patients with colon cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

We recently found variants in cancer stem cell genes (CD44, ALCAM and LGR5) significantly associated with increased time to recurrence (TTR) in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. In this study, we validated these genetic biomarkers in a large and independent patient cohort (n=599). Patients who received 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n=391) carrying at least one C allele in LGR5 rs17109924 had a significantly increased TTR compared with patients carrying the homozygous T/T variant (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.19-0.79; P=0.006). In patients treated with surgery alone (n=208), no association between LGR rs17109924 and TTR was found (P=0.728). In the multivariate Cox-analysis, LGR5 rs17109924 remained statistically significant (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.78; P=0.008) for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed in a large and independent study cohort that LGR5 rs17109924 is a predictive genetic biomarker for TTR in patients with colon cancer treated with 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

The preoperative lymphocyte to monocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome in patients with stage III colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation has a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of cancer. The lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) could be shown to be prognostic in haematologic neoplasia. In this study, we analysed the LMR with clinical outcome in stage II and III colon cancer patients. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-two patients with stage II and III colon cancer were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were calculated for time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Including all patients, the elevated preoperative LMR was significantly associated with increased TTR and OS in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.29-0.76, P=0.002; HR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.31-0.83, P=0.007; respectively). In subanalyses, the association was limited to patients with stage III (HR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.22-0.72, P=0.002), in contrast to patients with stage II (HR: 0.40, 95%CI: 0.28-1.66, P=0.397). When the subgroup of patients with 'high-risk' LMR≤2.83 was analysed, no benefit of adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy could be found (HR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.60-1.63; P=0.953). CONCLUSION: The LMR might be an independent prognostic marker for TTR in stage III colon cancer patients. Our results further suggest that high-risk patients based on the LMR do not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Independent validation of our findings is warranted.

The cyclin D1 (CCND1) rs9344 G>A polymorphism predicts clinical outcome in colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Recent evidence indicates a potential prognostic and predictive value for germline polymorphisms in genes involved in cell cycle control. We investigated the effect of cyclin D1 (CCND1) rs9344 G>A in stage II/III colon cancer patients and validated the findings in an independent study cohort. For evaluation and validation set, a total of 264 and 234 patients were included. Patients treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, carrying the CCND1 rs9344 A/A genotype had significantly decreased time-to-tumor recurrence (TTR) in univariate analysis and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-5.29; P=0.019). There was no significant association between CCND1 rs9344 G>A and TTR in patients with curative surgery alone. In the validation set, the A allele of CCND1 rs9344 G>A remained significantly associated with decreased TTR in univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.05-3.58; P=0.035). CCND1 rs9344 G>A may be a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker in stage II/III colon cancer patients, however, prospective trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

A prospective randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with stage II colon cancer.

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomised to either adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV (100 mg m(-2) LV+450 mg m(-2) 5-FU weekly, weeks 1-6, in 8 weeks cycles x 7) or surveillance only. Five hundred patients were evaluable for analyses. After a median follow-up of 95.6 months, 55 of 252 patients (21.8%) have died in the 5-FU/LV arm and 58 of 248 patients (23.4%) in the surveillance arm. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two treatment arms (hazard ratios, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61-1.27, P=0.49). The relative risk for tumour relapse was higher for patients on the surveillance arm than for those on the 5-FU/LV arm; however, this difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.06, P=0.09). Consequently, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between the two trial arms. In conclusion, results of this trial demonstrate a trend to a lower risk for relapse in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU/LV for stage II colon cancer. However, in this study with limited power to detect small differences between the study arms, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to significantly improve DFS and OS.

Randomised trial: One cycle of anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy compared with six cycles of CMF treatment in node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients.

AIM: A randomised, controlled clinical trial was initiated in 1984 to test whether 1 cycle of anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of breast cancer patients presenting with stage II disease and negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PgR), as compared with 6 cycles of dose-reduced CMF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within 7 years 263 women with stage II breast cancer were randomised either to receive 1 cycle of doxorubicin, vinblastine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5- fluorouracil (AV-CMF) or to receive 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were stratified for tumour stage, nodal stage, menopausal status, type of surgery and participating centre. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 100 months, neither disease-free (DFS) nor overall survival (OS) differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 6 cycles of a non-standard low-dose CMF regimen 1 cycle of anthracycline- containing adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the outcome in women with stage II receptor-negative breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS.

Chemotherapy versus hormonal adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Comparisons between the effects exerted by adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based polychemotherapy and endocrine treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients are validly drawn in the presence of steroid hormone receptor responsiveness. First, ovarian ablation still remains to show activity compared with chemotherapy in large patient groups. Second, tamoxifen is at least as active in this cohort and, by comparison, produces a significant effect in mortality reduction. Third, induction of reversible amenorrhoea by LHRH analogue administration has shown comparable effects in terms of recurrence-free survival. Finally, recent European investigations have indicated significant recurrence reductions with LHRH analogue-tamoxifen combination strategies. In conclusion, various endocrine treatment modalities have been substantiated as equiefficient to polychemotherapy. Tamoxifen added to a LHRH analogue further diminishes the recurrence rates and now appears to be a valid treatment alternative. We argue that selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for premenopausal breast cancer patients be increasingly guided by knowledge of the steroid hormone receptor levels.

Prognostic significance of mutations in the p53 gene, particularly in the zinc-binding domains, in lymph node- and steroid receptor positive breast cancer patients. Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group.

The aim of our study was to evaluate if p53 mutations, especially those in the L2/L3 domains of the p53 gene, add prognostic information for node-positive and steroid receptor positive breast cancer patients. Two hundred and five tumour samples from a randomised clinical trial of 596 lymph node- and steroid receptor positive breast cancer patients were included. All patients had been randomly allocated to receive 20 mg of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) daily for 2 years or TAM plus one cycle of low-dose, short-term chemotherapy. For detection of p53 mutations we used in vitro amplification by polymerase chain reaction and consecutively performed temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-TGGE) and direct sequencing. We found p53 mutations in 42/205 (20%) cases: 16/42 (38%) p53 mutations occurred within the L2/L3 domains of the p53 gene, and 26/42 (62%) outside the L2/L3 domains. p53 mutation served as a statistically significant parameter in predicting disease-free survival in univariate (P = 0.02) and multivariate (P = 0.009) analysis. For overall survival, no significant differences were observed. Patients with tumours that had p53 mutations within the L2/L3 domains of the gene showed no significant difference to those with mutations outside the L2/L3 domains for disease-free survival. For overall survival, mutations in the L2/L3 domains showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.05) in multivariate analysis, but not in univariate analysis (P = 0.13). We conclude that mutation in the L2/L3 domains of the p53 gene is not an independent prognostic indicator of disease outcome for patients suffering from breast cancer with lymph node metastases and positive steroid receptors.

Very low-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in steroid receptor negative stage I breast cancer patients. Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group.

A randomised clinical trial was performed to test whether or not low-dose chemotherapy lasting only 35 days improves the outcome of breast cancer patients with stage I disease and negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER-, PgR-). Between 1984 and 1990, 277 stage I breast cancer patients with tumours negative for both oestrogen and progesterone receptors were randomised to receive either low-dose short-term chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of one cycle of doxorubicin, vincristin (AV) and one cycle of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were stratified for tumour stage, type of surgery, menopausal status and participating centre. Results were analysed both by univariate and multivariate statistical. After a median length of follow-up of 84 months, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients having received adjuvant chemotherapy and the control group. Uni- and multivariate analysis did not show any significant prognostic or therapy related factor. A low-dose short-term adjuvant chemotherapy is insufficient to improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer stage I with ER-, PgR-tumours.

A phase I/II study of 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer patients.

A total of 50 patients were treated weekly with 5-fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin (LV), and 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin (THP) as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC). In phase I the doses of LV (500 mg/m2, day 1) and FU (350 mg/m2, day 1) were held constant, while the dose of THP (day 1) was escalated, from the initial dose of 10 mg/m2 up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Twenty-eight patients entered phase I, and MTD for THP was defined as 35 mg/m2 in this combination. Dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression and hepatotoxicity. In phase II, another 22 patients were treated with THP at a dose level of 30 mg/m2. Including 4 patients already treated at this dose in the first part, 25 patients were evaluable for response: 1 patient obtained a complete response (CR) and 13 showed a partial response (PR), giving an objective response rate of 56%. The median duration of response was 9.1+ months and median survival, 15.5+ months. Side effects were generally mild, with ECOG grade I and II leukopenia in 51% of all cycles and grade III in 3% of the courses. Other toxicity included nausea and vomiting (54% and 8%, respectively) and alopecia (24%), all restricted to ECOG grade I and II. Our results suggest that weekly THP/LV-FU represents an active regimen for first-line treatment of ABC with relative low toxicity.

Combination therapy of 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and high-dose folinic acid in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase I-II study (preliminary results).

Previous clinical studies have suggested that 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin (THP) as well as 5-fluorouracil/high-dose folinic acid (5-FU/HDFA) are active and well-tolerated drugs in breast cancer treatment. This phase I-II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of THP in combination with 5-FU/HDFA as a weekly schedule and to examine the activity and safety of this drug regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer. 5-FU and HDFA were set at doses of 350 mg/qm i.v. and 500 mg/qm i.v., respectively, whereas the THP dose has been escalated in increments of 5 mg/qm i.v. beginning at a dose level of 10 mg/qm until reaching of MTD in at least four patients in one dose level. For determination of MTD the first six cycles of each patient have been taken into account. Up to July 1990, 21 patients previously not treated with chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were entered into the study; the latest patient entered at 35 mg/qm THP dose level. A total of 270 cycles have been administered so far. Anemia and leukopenia was limited to ECOG grades I and II. Other toxicities were mild or moderate. No acute or subacute cardiotoxicity has been observed. Up to July 1990, MTD had not been reached. In the second part of the study, at least another 14 patients have to be entered in a dose level one below the MTD to evaluate the activity and safety of this regimen in a phase II trial.