Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutrients ; 14(1)2022 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35011099

RESUMO

In adolescents, iron-deficiency anemia is the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years lost. The World Health Organization recommends delivering iron supplementation through school-based platforms, requiring partnerships with the education sector. This anemia-reduction intervention is valued for the perceived benefits of improved learning and school performance. This article aims to systematically review the available evidence on the relationship between iron status and anemia and impacts of iron interventions on cognitive and academic performance in adolescents. Fifty studies were included: n = 26 cross-sectional and n = 24 iron-containing interventions. Our review suggests that iron status and anemia may be associated with academic performance in some contexts and that iron supplementation during adolescence may improve school performance, attention, and concentration. However, nearly all supplementation trials were judged to have moderate or high risk of bias. We did not find evidence suggesting that iron status and anemia influenced or were associated with attention, intelligence, nor memory in adolescents. Further, iron supplementation did not improve memory and recall or intelligence. Overall, more high-quality research is needed to guide programmers and policy makers to understand the relationships between anemia and educational performance and the potential impacts of iron interventions, which effectively reduce anemia, on adolescents' learning and school performance.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico , Anemia Ferropriva/psicologia , Cognição , Ferro/sangue , Estado Nutricional , Adolescente , Anemia Ferropriva/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Suplementos Nutricionais , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro/administração & dosagem , Masculino
2.
J Nutr ; 151(8): 2264-2270, 2021 08 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33978167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Weekly iron-folic acid (IFA) supplements are recommended for all menstruating women in countries where anemia prevalence is ≥20%; however, it is unknown whether the inclusion of folic acid in weekly IFA supplements reduces anemia. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether the inclusion of folic acid in weekly IFA supplements conferred any benefit on hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, anemia reduction, or iron status [ferritin and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)], over iron alone. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Malaysia, n = 311 nonpregnant women (18-45 y old) received 60 mg Fe with either 0, 0.4, or 2.8 mg folic acid once-weekly for 16 wk. Fasting blood was collected at baseline and 16 wk. A generalized linear model (normal distribution with identity link) was used to assess Hb concentration at 16 wk (primary outcome). RESULTS: At baseline, 84% of women had low folate status (plasma folate < 14 nmol/L). At 16 wk, marginal mean (95% CI) Hb was 131 (130, 133), 131 (129, 132), and 132 (130, 133) g/L; ferritin was 58.2 (53.9, 62.5), 56.5 (52.2, 60.9), and 58.0 (53.7, 62.3) µg/L; and sTfR was 5.8 (5.5, 6.1), 5.8 (5.5, 6.1), and 5.9 (5.6, 6.2) mg/L in the 0, 0.4, and 2.8 mg/wk groups, respectively, with no differences between groups (P > 0.05). Baseline plasma folate concentration did not modify the effect of treatment on Hb concentration at 16 wk. Among all women, the risks of anemia [risk ratio (RR): 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.96; P = 0.03] and iron deficiency based on ferritin (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.44; P < 0.001) were lower at 16 wk than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low folate status among these nonpregnant Malaysian women, the inclusion of folic acid in weekly IFA supplements did not reduce anemia or improve iron status, over iron alone. However, the benefits of folic acid for neural tube defect prevention still warrant its retention in weekly IFA supplements.This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12619000818134.


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva , Anemia , Deficiências de Ferro , Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia Ferropriva/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Ácido Fólico , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Ferro , Malásia
3.
Adv Nutr ; 12(2): 334-342, 2021 03 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439978

RESUMO

Weekly iron and folic acid supplementation (WIFAS) is among the 8 key effective actions for improving adolescent nutrition included by the WHO in the 2018 guidelines. However, at present WIFAS in the WHO-recommended formulation is not included in the Model Essential Medicines List (MEML), limiting the potential for countries to import, produce, and prioritize this formulation as part of their national supply management and procurement plans for medicines. The WHO WIFAS guideline presents evidence that the formulation reduces anemia, but not that folic acid reduces neural tube defects (NTDs), because sufficient evidence was unavailable at the time of the last review. Recently, a 3-arm, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled folic acid efficacy trial on WIFAS was conducted to address this evidence gap. The study population included 331 women (18-45 y old), randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups, including a supplement with 60 mg Fe as ferrous fumarate and either 0 mg, 0.4 mg, or 2.8 mg of folic acid, to be consumed once weekly for 16 wk, followed by a 4-wk washout period. In this article we critically review how the outcomes of this folic acid efficacy trial, and how the evidence generated, could potentially be used to inform WHO WIFAS guidelines for the potential inclusion of this formulation on the MEML, and how this, in turn, may affect product availability. If the new evidence on weekly folic acid is assessed as adequately reducing the risk of NTDs, a guideline revision could be warranted and WIFAS could be presented to the MEML for the dual benefits of anemia reduction and NTD prevention. This inclusion could enable acceleration of implementing policies and programs to contribute to global anemia and NTD reduction efforts.


Assuntos
Anemia , Defeitos do Tubo Neural , Adolescente , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Ácido Fólico , Humanos , Ferro , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/tratamento farmacológico , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(12)2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272946

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Weekly iron-folic acid (IFA) supplements are recommended for all menstruating women in countries where anaemia prevalence is >20%. Anaemia caused by folate deficiency is low worldwide, and the need to include folic acid is in question. Including folic acid might reduce the risk of a neural tube defect (NTD) should a woman become pregnant. Most weekly supplements contain 0.4 mg folic acid; however, WHO recommends 2.8 mg because it is seven times the daily dose effective in reducing NTDs. There is a reluctance to switch to supplements containing 2.8 mg of folic acid because of a lack of evidence that this dose would prevent NTDs. Our aim was to investigate the effect of two doses of folic acid, compared with placebo, on red blood cell (RBC) folate, a biomarker of NTD risk. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm double-blind efficacy trial in Malaysia. Non-pregnant women (n=331) were randomised to receive 60 mg iron and either 0, 0.4, or 2.8 mg folic acid once weekly for 16 weeks. RESULTS: At 16 weeks, women receiving 0.4 mg and 2.8 mg folic acid per week had a higher mean RBC folate than those receiving 0 mg (mean difference (95% CI) 84 (54 to 113) and 355 (316 to 394) nmol/L, respectively). Women receiving 2.8 mg folic acid had a 271 (234 to 309) nmol/L greater mean RBC folate than those receiving 0.4 mg. Moreover, women in the 2.8 mg group were seven times (RR 7.3, 95% CI 3.9 to 13.7; p<0.0001) more likely to achieve an RBC folate >748 nmol/L, a concentration associated with a low risk of NTD, compared with the 0.4 mg group. CONCLUSION: Weekly IFA supplements containing 2.8 mg folic acid increases RBC folate more than those containing 0.4 mg. Increased availability and access to the 2.8 mg formulation is needed. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12619000818134).


Assuntos
Ácido Fólico , Defeitos do Tubo Neural , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro , Malásia/epidemiologia , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/epidemiologia , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/prevenção & controle , Gravidez
5.
Curr Dev Nutr ; 4(10): nzaa152, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33154991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Regression to the mean (RTM) is a statistical phenomenon where second measurements are more likely to be closer to the mean. This is particularly observed in those with baseline values further from the mean. Anemic individuals (hemoglobin <120 g/L) are often recruited when evaluating iron supplementation programs, as they are more likely to elicit a greater hemoglobin response; however, they are also at greater risk for RTM as their baseline values are lower than the overall population mean. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to calculate and apply RTM to a previously conducted iron supplementation trial of women in Cambodia at increasingly severe baseline anemia cutoffs (hemoglobin <120 g/L, <115 g/L, and <110 g/L). METHODS: Women received either 60 mg/d iron (n = 191) or placebo (n = 185) for 12 wk. Hemoglobin was measured at baseline and at 12 wk (endline), and change in hemoglobin was calculated in each group for each cutoff. RTM was calculated in the placebo group at each cutoff and applied to the change observed at each cutoff in the iron group to obtain the RTM-free effect. RESULTS: In the placebo group, mean change in hemoglobin increased as cutoffs became more extreme (0.9 g/L to 1.9 g/L in those with baseline hemoglobin <120 g/L and <110 g/L, respectively). RTM estimates similarly increased: 1.0 g/L (<120 g/L), 1.3 g/L (<115 g/L), and 1.8 g/L (<110g/L). When applying RTM to the iron group, we found that ∼10% of the "treatment effect" could be attributable to RTM at each cutoff. However, iron supplementation was still effective in increasing hemoglobin, with an increased effect in those with lower baseline values, as proven by the RTM-free effect at each cutoff: 8.7 g/L (<120 g/L), 10.9 g/L (<115 g/L), and 13.6g/L (<110 g/L). CONCLUSIONS: RTM may have accounted for ∼10% of the observed change in hemoglobin following iron supplementation; however, appropriate use of a placebo group in the statistical analyses of the trial controls for this potential RTM effect.

6.
BMJ Open ; 10(2): e034598, 2020 02 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029499

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Folic acid (0.4 mg) taken prior to and during early pregnancy reduces the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs). Because these birth defects occur early in pregnancy, before women may know they are pregnant, many countries have mandated the addition of folic acid to food staples. In countries where fortification is not possible, and weekly iron folic acid programmes exist to reduce anaemia, the WHO recommends that 2.8 mg (7×0.4 mg) folic acid be given instead of the current weekly practice of 0.4 mg. Currently, there is a lack of evidence to support if the 2.8 mg folic acid per week dose is sufficient to raise erythrocyte folate concentrations to a level associated with a reduced risk of a NTD-affected pregnancy. We aim to conduct a three-arm randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of weekly folic acid with iron on erythrocyte folate, a biomarker of NTD risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit non-pregnant women (n=300; 18-45 years) from Selangor, Malaysia. Women will be randomised to receive either 2.8, 0.4 or 0.0 (placebo) mg folic acid with 60 mg iron weekly for 16 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period. The primary outcome will be erythrocyte folate concentration at 16 weeks and the mean concentration will be compared between randomised treatment groups (intention-to-treat) using a linear regression model adjusting for the baseline measure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia (H18-00768) and Universiti Putra Malaysia (JKEUPM-2018-255). The results of this trial will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12619000818134 and NMRR-19-119-45736.


Assuntos
Eritrócitos/química , Ácido Fólico/administração & dosagem , Defeitos do Tubo Neural , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Humanos , Malásia , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA