Nasal and blood transcriptomic pathways underpinning the clinical response to grass pollen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a well-established disease-modifying therapy for allergic rhinitis, yet the fundamental mechanisms underlying its clinical effect remain inadequately understood. Gauging Response in Allergic Rhinitis to Sublingual and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of individuals allergic to timothy grass who received 2 years of placebo (n = 30), subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) (n = 27), or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) (n = 27) and were then followed for 1 additional year. OBJECTIVE: We used yearly biospecimens from the Gauging Response in Allergic Rhinitis to Sublingual and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy study to identify molecular mechanisms of response. METHODS: We used longitudinal transcriptomic profiling of nasal brush and PBMC samples after allergen provocation to uncover airway and systemic expression pathways mediating responsiveness to AIT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01335139, EudraCT Number: 2010-023536-16. RESULTS: SCIT and SLIT demonstrated similar changes in gene module expression over time. In nasal samples, alterations included downregulation of pathways of mucus hypersecretion, leukocyte migration/activation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress (log2 fold changes -0.133 to -0.640, false discovery rates [FDRs] <0.05). We observed upregulation of modules related to epithelial development, junction formation, and lipid metabolism (log2 fold changes 0.104 to 0.393, FDRs <0.05). In PBMCs, modules related to cellular stress response and type 2 cytokine signaling were reduced by immunotherapy (log2 fold changes -0.611 to -0.828, FDRs <0.05). Expression of these modules was also significantly associated with both Total Nasal Symptom Score and peak nasal inspiratory flow, indicating important links between treatment, module expression, and allergen response. CONCLUSIONS: Our results identify specific molecular responses of the nasal airway impacting barrier function, leukocyte migration activation, and mucus secretion that are affected by both SCIT and SLIT, offering potential targets to guide novel strategies for AIT.

Differential induction of allergen-specific IgA responses following timothy grass subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: There is no detailed comparison of allergen-specific immunoglobulin responses following sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare nasal and systemic timothy grass pollen (TGP)-specific antibody responses during 2 years of SCIT and SLIT and 1 year after treatment discontinuation in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Nasal fluid and serum were obtained yearly (per-protocol population, n = 84). TGP-specific IgA1, IgA2, IgG4, IgG, and IgE were measured in nasal fluids by ELISA. TGP-specific IgA1, IgA2, and Phleum pratense (Phl p)1, 2, 4, 5b, 6, 7, 11, and 12 IgE and IgG4 were measured in sera by ELISA and ImmunoCAP, respectively. RESULTS: At years 2 and 3, TGP-IgA1/2 levels in nasal fluid were elevated in SLIT compared with SCIT (4.2- and 3.0-fold for IgA1, 2.0- and 1.8-fold for IgA2, respectively; all P < .01). TGP-IgA1 level in serum was elevated in SLIT compared with SCIT at years 1, 2, and 3 (4.6-, 5.1-, and 4.7-fold, respectively; all P < .001). Serum TGP-IgG level was higher in SCIT compared with SLIT (2.8-fold) at year 2. Serum TGP-IgG4 level was higher in SCIT compared with SLIT at years 1, 2, and 3 (10.4-, 27.4-, and 5.1-fold, respectively; all P < .01). Serum IgG4 levels to Phl p1, 2, 5b, and 6 were increased at years 1, 2, and 3 in SCIT and SLIT compared with placebo (Phl p1: 11.8- and 3.9-fold; Phl p2: 31.6- and 4.4-fold; Phl p5b: 135.5- and 5.3-fold; Phl p6: 145.4- and 14.7-fold, respectively, all at year 2 when levels peaked; P < .05). IgE to TGP in nasal fluid increased in the SLIT group at year 2 but not at year 3 compared with SCIT (2.8-fold; P = .04) and placebo (3.1-fold; P = .02). IgA to TGP and IgE and IgG4 to TGP components stratified participants according to treatment group and clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: The observed induction of IgA1/2 in SLIT and IgG4 in SCIT suggest key differences in the mechanisms of action.