Prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome with rosuvastatin: A multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial (SAVER).

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most frequent complications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) leading to considerable morbidity and cost. Apart from appropriate anticoagulation, there is no drug or medical intervention that helps to prevent PTS. We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine whether rosuvastatin can prevent PTS. METHODS: 312 patients receiving standard anticoagulation for a newly diagnosed VTE were randomly allocated to adjuvant rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 180 days (n = 155) or no rosuvastatin (n = 157). At the last study visit (Day 180 ± 21), an independent observer who was blinded to study treatment performed a PTS assessment using the Villalta scale. The primary clinical outcome of the trial was mean Villalta score at Day 180. We also explored the presence of PTS as defined by Villalta score > 4 at Day 180. Patients mean age was 46.7 ± 10.8 years, 55.8% were female. RESULTS: At Day 180, the Villalta score was 3.5 ± 0.3 in the rosuvastatin arm vs. 3.3 ± 0.3 in the control arm (p = 0.59), and presence of PTS (Villalta >4) was 29.7% in the rosuvastatin arm vs. 25.5% in the control arm (p = 0.41). Secondary analyses showed no difference between trial arms for presence of severe PTS at Day 180 (2.0% vs. 2.7%, p = 1) and for changes in Villalta score between baseline and Day 180 (-3.7 ± 4.4 vs. -4.0 ± 5.0, p = 0.59). CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled pilot trial did not demonstrate efficacy of rosuvastatin to reduce Villalta score. Further studies with longer duration of exposure to rosuvastatin are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02679664.

Statins for venous event reduction in patients with venous thromboembolism: A multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial assessing feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Statins may reduce the risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, no randomized trials have explored this hypothesis. We performed a pilot randomized trial to determine feasibility of recruitment for a larger trial of secondary VTE prevention with rosuvastatin. METHODS: Patients with a newly diagnosed symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, receiving standard anticoagulation, were randomly allocated to adjuvant rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 180 days or no rosuvastatin for 6 months. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and December 2019, 3391 patients were assessed for eligibility in six centers. Of these patients, 1347 (39.7%) were eligible and approached for participation in the trial and 312 (23.1%) were randomized. The mean rate of randomization was 8.2 ± 4.3 patients per month. During follow-up, five recurrent VTE events were observed, three (1.9%) in the rosuvastatin group (two pulmonary embolism, one deep vein thrombosis), and two (1.3%) in the control group (two pulmonary embolism; P = 0.68). One major arterial event occurred in the rosuvastatin arm and none in the control arm (0.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: This pilot trial supports the feasibility of a larger scale randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of adjuvant rosuvastatin for the secondary prevention of VTE.

Normalization of disrupted clock gene expression in males with tetraplegia: a crossover randomized placebo-controlled trial of melatonin supplementation.

STUDY DESIGN: Crossover double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: Circadian oscillators are located both in the brain and in peripheral organs. Melatonin, the main brain-derived hormone governing circadian variations, is highly associated with daylight patterns. However, in subjects with tetraplegia the melatonin levels are blunted. Here we studied peripheral oscillators in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in males with tetraplegia by examining how exogenous melatonin may influence the expression of clock gene mRNAs. SETTING: Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway. METHODS: Six males with tetraplegia received 2 mg of melatonin or placebo 4 days before the study period. We also included six able-bodied men sleeping or kept awake during the night. Plasma samples were collected four times during a 24-h period. The mRNA expression levels of the clock genes PER1, PER2, BMAL1, and REV-ERBα were quantified in PBMCs using quantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS: The mRNA expression levels of PER-1 and -2 and REV-ERBα were increased at 04:00 h compared with the able-bodied controls (p < 0.05). Melatonin supplementation changed mRNA peak-time toward the time of supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Several peripheral clock genes displayed distorted expression levels in tetraplegia. Supplementation with melatonin changed the mRNA expression levels of these genes toward those observed among able-bodied. SPONSORSHIP: Financial support was provided from the Throne Holst Foundation, Sunnaas Rehabilitation hospital and the University of Ferrara (FAR2016).

Reduced peak, but no diurnal variation, in thrombin generation upon melatonin supplementation in tetraplegia. A randomised, placebo-controlled study.

Tetraplegic patients have increased risk of venous thrombosis despite anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. Moreover, they have blunted plasma variations in melatonin and altered diurnal variation of several haemostatic markers, compared with able-bodied. However, whether healthy individuals and tetraplegic patients, with or without melatonin, display abnormalities in thrombin generation during a 24-hour (h) cycle, is unknown. We therefore used the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT) assay to examine diurnal variations and the possible role of melatonin in thrombin generation. Six men with long-standing complete tetraplegia were included in a randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study with melatonin supplementation (2 mg, 4 consecutive nights), whereas six healthy, able-bodied men served as controls. Ten plasma samples were collected frequently during a 24-h awake/sleep cycle. No significant diurnal variation of any of the measured CAT indices was detected in the three study groups. Whereas endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was independent (p > 0.05) of whether the tetraplegic men received melatonin or placebo, melatonin decreased (p = 0.005) peak values in tetraplegia compared with those given placebo. Able-bodied men had lower (p = 0.019) ETP and Lag-Time (p = 0.018) compared with tetraplegics receiving placebo. Neither the Time-to-Peak nor the Start-Tail was affected (p > 0.05) by melatonin in tetraplegia. In conclusion, indices of thrombin generation are not subjected to diurnal variation in healthy able-bodied or tetraplegia, but peak thrombin generation is reduced in tetraplegic men receiving oral melatonin.

Women's values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy: a comparison of direct-choice and decision analysis using patient specific utilities.

BACKGROUND: Women with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have an increased recurrence risk during pregnancy. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) reduces this risk, but is costly, burdensome, and may increase risk of bleeding. The decision to start thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy is sensitive to women's values and preferences. Our objective was to compare women's choices using a holistic approach in which they were presented all of the relevant information (direct-choice) versus a personalized decision analysis in which a mathematical model incorporated their preferences and VTE risk to make a treatment recommendation. METHODS: Multicenter, international study. Structured interviews were on women with a history of VTE who were pregnant, planning, or considering pregnancy. Women indicated their willingness to receive thromboprophylaxis based on scenarios using personalized estimates of VTE recurrence and bleeding risks. We also obtained women's values for health outcomes using a visual analog scale. We performed individualized decision analyses for each participant and compared model recommendations to decisions made when presented with the direct-choice exercise. RESULTS: Of the 123 women in the study, the decision model recommended LMWH for 51 women and recommended against LMWH for 72 women. 12% (6/51) of women for whom the decision model recommended thromboprophylaxis chose not to take LMWH; 72% (52/72) of women for whom the decision model recommended against thromboprophylaxis chose LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high degree of discordance between decisions in the direct-choice exercise and decision model recommendations. Although which approach best captures individuals' true values remains uncertain, personalized decision support tools presenting results based on personalized risks and values may improve decision making.