A meta-analysis of mindfulness-based interventions for improving mental health and burden among caregivers of persons living with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based interventions are becoming increasingly popular and are effective in lowering depressive symptoms and caregiver burden. However, the overall efficacy of therapies in stress and anxiety management is unreported, and no study to date has performed a subgroup analysis to investigate the intervention dose response of outcomes. AIMS: To quantitatively identify the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for caregivers of persons living with dementia. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of six databases was undertaken from the date of inception to June 18, 2023. The DerSimonian-Laird model with random effects was used to examine the overall effect and its heterogeneity in the studies. Version 2 of the risk of bias (RoB 2) tool was employed to analyze the publication bias of each randomized study. Funnel and forest plots were created to represent the findings. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis. Mindfulness-based interventions significantly reduced stress and anxiety of caregivers of persons living with dementia. In addition, interventions provided for ≥8 weeks were beneficial in reducing depression in caregivers. However, mindfulness-based interventions did not offer significant benefits in reducing depression or caregiver burden immediately after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Mindfulness-based interventions have the potential to help caregivers of people living with dementia. This study could be used as a model for future research into and implementation of mindfulness-based therapies for caregivers. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Mindfulness-based therapies appear to alleviate stress and anxiety but are ineffective in reducing depression and burden in caregivers of persons living with dementia. Well-designed RCTs with more rigorous methodology and a larger sample size should be conducted to firm the conclusion of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for caregivers of persons living with dementia.

Effects of art therapy for people with mild or major neurocognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of non-pharmacological, interactive, and emotional art therapy interventions for patients with mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) or major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed English-language literature published from January 1, 2001, to August 22, 2021, and indexed in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. People with mild NCD or MNCD who received art therapy were classified as the intervention group. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. RESULTS: Among nine included studies, depression was significantly reduced as compared with control groups (Cohen's d = -0.52 [95 % CI = -0.99-0.05], p < 0.001, I2 = 62.90 %) but not cognitive function or quality of life. CONCLUSION: People with mild neurocognitive disorder or MNCD are encouraged to engage in art therapy delivered by art therapists collaborating with healthcare providers. The effects of specific types of art therapy should be explored. PRACTICAL IMPLICATION: Healthcare providers should be encouraged to provide art therapy designed to reduce depression in patients with mild NCD or MNCD.

Adherence to Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation (IFAS) intake among pregnant women: A systematic review meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence to iron and folic acid supplementation represents a significant factor contributing to the prevention and treatment of anaemia in pregnancy. However, limited studies have systematically investigated iron and folic acid supplementation adherence among pregnant mothers using a global perspective. We aimed to systematically identify iron and folic acid supplementation adherence and associated factors among pregnant women. DESIGN: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we did a systematic search of Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to October 20, 2020. We included all cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies and used the Joanna Briggs Institute tool to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesise the pooled odds ratio for iron and folic acid supplementation adherence using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic, and Egger's test was used to assess publication bias. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Eighteen studies were included in systematic review and meta-analysis, including a total of 5,537 pregnant women. The pooled odds ratio for iron and folic acid supplementation adherence in primipara vs multipara, anaemia vs non-anaemia, knowledgeable vs limited knowledge of anaemia, and knowledgeable vs limited knowledge of iron and folic acid supplementation were 3.91 (95% confidence interval: 1.75-8.75), 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.67-1.77), 0.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.69), and 2.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.47), respectively. KEY CONCLUSIONS: This review yielded evidence that having one pregnancy, having anaemia, and having satisfactory knowledge of both anaemia and iron and folic acid supplementation were positively associated with iron and folic acid supplementation adherence.