Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prof Inferm ; 72(3): 181-186, 2019.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883569

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Coronary interventions and electrophysiology procedures may be painful both during and shortly after the procedure. AIM: To assess the onset of pain and anxiety in patient undergoing coronary interventions and electrophysiology procedures; to describe the administration (frequency, timing, dosage and outcomes) of analgesics and anxiolytics before, during and after the procedure. METHODS: A descriptive multicenter study was carried out. Pain and anxiety were measured with a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) before, during, after the procedure and for the following 24 hours. Patient were asked to rate their satisfaction for the information received and pain control. RESULTS: Data on 230 patients were collected. The most performed procedure was the transradial coronary catheterization (68.7%). The pacemaker/defibrillator implantation resulted the most painful procedure (median 4, IQR 3-6) and also the most anxious (median 5, IQR 2-6). 13 Patients received an analgesic during the procedure for a low-to-severe pain; during the following 24 hours 34 patients (5 undergoing transradial coronary catheterization and 29 the implant of pacemaker/cardiac-defibrillator) suffered from severe pain and with the exception of 5, all requested pain relief. Satisfaction for pain control was inadequate for patients who underwent electrophysiology procedures and 55 patients would have needed more information on pain. CONCLUSION: Pain control and patient satisfaction may be improved, pre-procedural anxiety needs more attention and better information on the procedure should be provided.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ansiolíticos/administração & dosagem , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Dor Processual/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Ansiedade/etiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Dor Processual/epidemiologia , Dor Processual/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente
2.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 20(10): 593-608, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593165

RESUMO

Managing a patient suffering from a chronic disease requires a multidisciplinary team that can take care of them beyond the simple coordination of various specialties. In this context, a central role in the treatment of chronic heart disease is the continuity of care that should promote organic integration among different hospital departments, hospital and community. This position paper of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) aims at defining the general principles to inspire care for complex cardiac patients at different phases of the disease. A multidisciplinary integrated holistic approach uses analytical tools able to understand the elements that characterize complexity and therefore suggest appropriate management strategies: (i) care pathways aimed at optimizing treatments; (ii) care pathways in intensive care and ward in a multidisciplinary perspective; (iii) integration of social and health needs; (iv) nursing role in the context of continuity of outpatient, community and home care; (v) promotion of educational interventions.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Doença Aguda , Doença Crônica , Formulários como Assunto , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Cardiopatias/complicações , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA