Tumor-specific CD8-positive T cell-mediated antitumor immunity is implicated in the antitumor effect of local hyperthermia.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the contribution of T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in the antitumor effect of local hyperthermia (LH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were injected with the mouse lymphoma cell line, E.G7-OVA, in the right femur on day 0. LH was induced by immersing the right femur in a water bath at 42 °C for 60 min on day 7, followed by administration of anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) or anti-CTLA-4 mAb (days 8, 11, and 14). The effect of LH on tumor growth (TG) was assessed by measuring the duration until tumor volume reached 1000 mm3 and survival time. Tumor-specific T cell responses were measured using enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. RESULTS: TG with and without LH treatment was 9.0 ± 9.6 and 7.0 ± 1.6 days, respectively. TG was significantly slower with LH treatment (p = .01). The therapeutic effect of LH was mitigated by addition of anti-CD8 mAb (p < .05 for both TG and survival) compared with the untreated (control) group. Furthermore, addition of anti-CTLA-4 mAb did not significantly affect the therapeutic effect of LH. The ELISpot assay showed that the number of spots in the LH group (276.3 ± 14.5) was significantly greater than in the control group (59.0 ± 4.5, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CD8-positive T cell-mediated antitumor immunity significantly contributes to the antitumor effect of LH.

HLA class I expression and its alteration by preoperative hyperthermo-chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Enhancing immunologic responses, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression on tumor cells and recognition and elimination of tumor cells by tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), is considered a novel concept of radiotherapy. The present study examined patients who underwent preoperative hyperthermo-chemoradiotherapy (HCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer to assess the correlation between HLA class I expression and clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who received preoperative HCRT were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 33-85 years) and 4, 18, and 56 patients had clinical stage I, II and III disease, respectively. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues excised before and after HCRT were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis with an anti-HLA class I-A, B, C antibody. HLA class I expression was graded according to tumor cell positivity. RESULTS: In pre-HCRT, the number of specimens categorized as Grade 0 and 1 were 19 (24%) and 58 (74%), respectively. Only 1 patient (1%) showed Grade 2 expression. However, 6 (8%), 27 (35%), 7 (9%), and 12 (15%) post-HCRT specimens were graded as Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was a significant increase in HLA class I expression in post-HCRT specimens (p<0.01). However, neither pre- nor post-HCRT HLA class I expression affected overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in clinical stage III patients. Univariate analysis revealed that Post-HCRT HLA class I expression showed a significant negative relationship with LC (p<0.05). Nevertheless, multivariate analysis showed that there was no correlation between HLA class I expression and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: HCRT increased HLA class I expression in rectal cancer patients. However, multivariate analysis failed to show any correlation between the level of HLA class I expression and prognosis.