Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine CaHA (+) for Soft Tissue Augmentation: Results from an Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a versatile technique for line filling, skin tightening, lifting, contouring, and volumizing. The present study was designed to confirm safety and effectiveness of the product with lidocaine (CaHA (+)) in a holistic treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs), marionette lines, and/or cheeks. METHODS: A total of 207 subjects with moderate to severe facial volume deficit were treated with CaHA(+) in this open-label study. Effectiveness assessments included Merz Aesthetics Scales® (MAS), investigator- and subject-assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales (iGAIS/sGAIS), and FACE-QTM questionnaires. Responder rates were defined as at least one-point improvement on MAS according to blinded rating. Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting. RESULTS: Primary endpoint was evaluated 12 weeks after last injection. Responder rates were 93.6%, 88.7%, and 81.9% in the NLFs, marionette lines, and cheeks, respectively, and were statistically significant above the pre-defined 60% threshold (P< 0.0001). Investigator- and subject-assessed GAIS were consistent and showed high rates of improvement throughout the study, with peak values of 98.0% at week 4 on iGAIS and 93.5% at 12 weeks after last injection on sGAIS. After 18 months, the majority of subjects (52.5%) still perceived improvement via sGAIS. Moreover, total FACE-Q scores demonstrated high subject satisfaction with treatment. All related treatment emergent adverse events were transient and expected injection-site reactions mostly of mild to moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: CaHA (+) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness in the treatment of NLFs, marionette lines, and cheek volume loss in real-life conditions up to 18 months. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):481-487. doi:10.36849/JDD.6737.

Prevention of Progression of Lipedema With Liposuction Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia: Results of an International Consensus Conference.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder of subcutaneous adipose tissue that usually affects the lower extremities of women. Also known as "two-body syndrome," the fat accumulations in lipedema are unsightly and painful. The disorder is well-known in Europe but is largely unrecognized and underdiagnosed in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To hold the First International Consensus Conference on Lipedema with the purpose of reviewing current European guidelines and the literature regarding the long-term benefits that have been reported to occur after lymph-sparing liposuction for lipedema using tumescent local anesthesia. METHODS: International experts on liposuction for lipedema were convened as part of the First International Congress on Lipedema in Vienna, Austria, June 9 to 10, 2017. RESULTS: Multiple studies from Germany have reported long-term benefits for as long as 8 years after liposuction for lipedema using tumescent local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Lymph-sparing liposuction using tumescent local anesthesia is currently the only effective treatment for lipedema.

Liposuction of the Neck: Low Incidence of Nerve Injury and Other Complications in 987 Patients.

The neck is one of the most common areas treated by liposuction. Neck liposuction decreases fat volume, causes skin contraction, and restores a more youthful appearance. We present a large case series (n=987) performed by three dermatologic surgeons. Five patients developed temporary post-operative marginal mandibular dysfunction, one patient had submandibular gland ptosis and one patient had arterial bleeding. Seroma, skin necrosis, scarring, and hyperpigmentation did not occur following neck liposuction. Neck liposuction performed with tumescent local anesthesia is a safe procedure associated with a low incidence of nerve injury and other complications.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):30-34.

Consensus Recommendations for Combined Aesthetic Interventions in the Face Using Botulinum Toxin, Fillers, and Energy-Based Devices.

BACKGROUND: The aging process is a complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors across multiple layers of the face. Accordingly, combining aesthetic interventions targeting different manifestations of aging often leads to better results than single modalities alone. However, no guidelines for a pan-facial approach using multiple interventions have been published to date. OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus recommendations for the optimal combination and ideal sequence of botulinum toxin (BoNT), hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, and microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) in persons of all Fitzpatrick skin types. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen specialists convened under the guidance of a certified moderator. Consensus was defined as approval from 75% to 94% of all participants, whereas agreement of ≥95% denoted a strong consensus. RESULTS: Optimal aesthetic treatment of the face begins with a thorough patient assessment and an individualized treatment plan. Spacing consecutive treatments 1 to 2 weeks apart allows for resolution of side effects and/or to assess results. For same-day treatments, BoNT and fillers may be performed together in either sequence, whereas MFU-V is recommended before injectable agents. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus supports a combination approach using multiple modalities in specific sequence for the safe and effective treatment of the aging face.

Double-blind, randomized, intraindividual comparison study of the efficacy of prilocaine and lidocaine in tumescent local anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) with lidocaine or prilocaine solutions is widely used in dermatology. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of efficacy and safety of lidocaine and prilocaine in liposuctions with TLA. METHODS: TLA was performed using defined dilutions of lidocaine or prilocaine. Half-side comparisons were applied on 26 patients undergoing symmetric liposuction. Pain reduction (overall sensation and pain at lancet prick) and tolerance were assessed before, during and 2-24 h after liposuction. RESULTS: No differences in overall pain sensation between the substances were detected during and after liposuction except a more rapid onset with lidocaine (less pain after 15 min, p < 0.043). Local tolerance of both substances was excellent. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine and prilocaine used in TLA for liposuction show good efficacy and tolerance. A fixed combination of lidocaine and prilocaine may reduce the risk of side effects when great quantities of TLA are needed.