The first 3 years of national bowel cancer screening at a single UK tertiary centre.

AIM: St Mark's Bowel Cancer Screening Centre commenced screening in October 2006 as a contributor to the national programme. The first 35 months' experience is reported. METHOD: Individuals with a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) were offered colonoscopy or alternatives if they had significant comorbidity. All screening data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Of the 98 815 FOBT kits issued, 42 523 were returned (43% uptake; 20.79% men). In total, 1339/1488 (90%) FOBT-positive participants attended the nurse clinic (57% men). Of these, 1057 had an index colonoscopy, 115 had a computed tomography colonoscopy (CTC) and eight had a flexible sigmoidoscopy. Five hundred and seventeen (44%) procedures were 'normal' (no polyps/cancers). Eighty (6%) individuals had colorectal cancer. The polyp detection rate in index procedures, including colonoscopy, CTC and flexible sigmoidoscopy, was 50%. The adenoma detection rate of all colonoscopies was 62.8%. The median polyp size was 5 (1-80) mm. In total, 1200 colonoscopies were performed by five accredited colonoscopists (96% completion rate). There were 13 (1%) adverse events with < 1 in 500 patients undergoing polypectomy requiring a transfusion. There was one 30-day postsurgical mortality, one perforation and no colonoscopy-related mortality. Almost all 39/40 (97%) patients in the BCS programme felt that the findings were adequately explained compared with 21/32 (64%) elective patients (P < 0.001) within the same unit. CONCLUSIONS: At this bowel cancer screening single centre, colonoscopy completion rates were high (unadjusted caecal intubation rate of 96%) and complication rates were low. In contrast to other published data, the uptake and cancer-detection rates were lower.

Magnetic endoscope imaging: a new technique for localizing colonic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The precise localization of advanced colorectal lesions preoperatively directs the appropriate surgical management. The use of internal landmarks at colonoscopy can be inaccurate, and other methods are therefore necessary to localize lesions precisely. Magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI), a real-time, nonradiographic technique for imaging of the colonoscope, may assist in determining the location of lesions found at colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out to determine the accuracy of MEI for localizing the colonoscope tip anatomically. The MEI system was used to identify one of four predetermined locations within the colon. Once identified, two endoscopic marking clips were attached to the colonic mucosa, and 400 - 500 ml of Urografin radiographic contrast medium was injected to produce an air-contrast "enema." The clips were subsequently localized using plain abdominal radiography, assessed by a single experienced radiologist who was blinded to the colonoscopic findings. RESULTS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The overall accuracy of MEI in comparison with the air-contrast "enema" was 90 % (26 of 29 cases). There were three slight errors of localization - clips localized to the descending rather than the sigmoid-descending colon junction (n = 1), or to either side of the mid-transverse (n = 1) and hepatic flexure (n = 1) - but these were not considered to be of surgical or clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: MEI is a reliable and accurate method for determining the anatomical position of the endoscope tip during colonoscopy. When it becomes commercially available, we believe the use of MEI will avoid the need for unnecessary barium enemas for localization of lesions prior to definitive surgery.

Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?

BACKGROUND: In our experience colonoscopy in women is more difficult than in men. A retrospective review of 2194 colonoscopies performed by a single experienced endoscopist (CBW) showed that 31% of examinations in women were considered technically difficult compared with 16% in men. METHODS: To investigate a possible anatomic basis for this finding, normal barium enema series from 183 female and 162 male patients were identified. From these barium enemas, measurements of colonic length and mobility were independently taken by two physicians who were unaware of each patient's gender. RESULTS: Total colonic length was greater in women (median, 155 cm) compared to men (median, 145 cm), p = 0.005, despite women's smaller stature (p < 0.0001). Although there were no significant differences in rectum plus sigmoid, descending, or ascending plus cecum segmental lengths, women had longer transverse colons (female median length, 48 cm; male median length, 40 cm), p < 0.0001. There were no differences in mobility of the descending colon and transverse colon between the sexes, but the transverse colon reached the true pelvis more often in women (62%) than in men (26%), p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy appears to be a technically more difficult procedure in women. The reason for this may be due in part to an inherently longer colon.

The quest for a more acceptable bowel preparation: comparison of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution and a mannitol/Picolax mixture for colonoscopy.

Eighty-nine consecutive patients attending for day-case colonoscopy were randomly allocated either polyethylene glycol/balanced electrolyte (PEG) mixture (n = 45) or a mannitol/Picolax mixture (n = 44). Both preparations were administered in two fractions. Patients recorded their experience of the preparation on a questionnaire and one of two experienced endoscopists (unaware of the type of preparation given) assessed the result of bowel cleansing. Carbon dioxide insufflation was used for all examinations. Good/excellent bowel cleansing occurred in significantly more patients given PEG, 43 (96%), than those allocated mannitol/Picolax, 34 (77%), p = 0.01. More patients receiving mannitol/Picolax were able to complete the preparation in full than patients receiving PEG (38 vs 27, p = 0.01). More patients found the taste of mannitol/Picolax pleasant compared to PEG (46% vs 20%). Both preparations had a similar side-effect profile. Of those patients tested, 13% receiving mannitol/Picolax had a postural drop in blood pressure and blood parameters suggestive of mild dehydration. A fractionated administration of PEG as a bowel preparation for day-case colonoscopy is well tolerated and superior as a cleansing agent to a mannitol/Picolax combination. Provided carbon dioxide is used as the insufflating agent, mannitol/Picolax is an acceptable alternative in fit, young patients intolerant of PEG.

Can barium enema indicate when colonoscopy will be difficult?

The barium enemas of 48 consecutive patients, who were technically difficult to intubate at colonoscopy, were compared to those of 46 patients who were not. Measurements were taken of colonic length and mobility, and an assessment made of diverticular disease. Rectosigmoid length (mean difficult group = 61 cm, mean control = 54 cm, P = 0.01) and total colonic length (mean difficult group = 157 cm, mean control = 140 cm, P < 0.0001) were greater in the difficult colonoscopy group as were transverse colon mobility (mean difficult group = 10 cm, mean control = 7 cm, P = 0.003) or redundancy (transverse colon reaching the true pelvis on the erect film); 65% difficult group vs 17% control group, P < 0.0001. The presence of moderate or severe diverticular disease was also greater in the difficult (23%) compared to the control (4%) group, P = 0.02. When available, assessment of a previous barium enema is a useful guide to probable technical difficulty of colonscopy. It may allow appropriate allocation of potentially difficult cases to specialist endoscopy lists.

Ischaemic colitis in association with sigmoid carcinoma: a report of two cases.

The association of ischaemic colitis with a distal obstructing carcinoma is described in two patients. When a segment of colonic ischaemia is demonstrated on barium enema, it is important to consider an association with a distal tumour.