Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Improving Subjective and Eudaimonic Well-Being in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: Better subjective and eudaimonic well-being fosters better health conditions. Several studies have confirmed that mindfulness-based interventions are effective for improving well-being; however, the samples examined in these studies have been limited to specific populations, and the studies only measured certain aspects of well-being rather than the entire construct. Additionally, few studies have examined the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on well-being. The present study examines the feasibility of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and its effectiveness for improving subjective and eudaimonic well-being among community residents. Methods: The study design featured an 8-week randomized, waiting-list controlled, parallel-group study. 8 weekly mindfulness classes, followed by 2 monthly classes, were provided for healthy individuals aged 20-65 years who had a Satisfaction with Life Scale score of ≤ 24 indicating average to low cognitive aspect of subjective well-being. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000031885, URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036376). Results: The results showed that cognitive aspect of subjective well-being and mindfulness skills were significantly improved at 8 weeks, and this effect was enhanced up to the end of the follow-up period. Positive affective aspect of subjective and eudaimonic well-being were significantly improved at 16 weeks. Conclusions: Eight weeks of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy with a 2-month follow-up period improves cognitive and affective aspects of subjective and eudaimonic well-being in healthy individuals. The order of improvement was cognitive, positive affective, and eudaimonic well-being. To verify these findings, multi-center randomized controlled trials with active control groups and longer follow-up periods are warranted.

Thalamic volume, resting-state activity, and their association with the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective antidepressant treatment. Biological predictors of clinical outcome to ECT are valuable. We aimed to examine multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data that correlates to the efficacy of ECT. Structural and resting-state functional MRI data were acquired from 46 individuals (25 depressed individuals who received ECT, and 21 healthy controls). Whole-brain grey matter volume (GMV) and fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF) were investigated to identify brain regions associated with post-ECT Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) total scores. GMV and fALFF values were compared with those in healthy controls using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Remission was defined by HAM-D ≤7. A multiple regression analysis revealed that pretreatment smaller GMV in the left thalamus was associated with worse response to ECT (i.e. higher post-ECT HAM-D). Pretreatment higher fALFF in the right anterior insula, and lower fALFF in the left thalamus and the cerebellum were associated with worse outcomes. The left thalamus was identified in both GMV and fALFF analyses. Nonremitters showed significantly smaller thalamic GMV compared to remitters and controls. We found that pretreatment thalamic volume and resting-state activity were associated with the efficacy of ECT. Our results highlight the importance of the thalamus as a possible biological predictor and its role in the underlying mechanisms of ECT action.