Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Urol ; 51(5): 1357-63, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17113216

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction in Switzerland based on a nationwide registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 209 patients (181 females, 28 males) underwent SNM testing between July 2000 and December 2005 in Switzerland. Subjective symptom improvement, bladder/pain diary variables, adverse events, and their management were prospectively registered. RESULTS: SNM testing was successful (defined as improvement of more than 50% in bladder/pain diary variables) in 102 of 209 patients (49%). An implantable pulse generator (IPG) was placed in 91 patients (89% of all successfully tested and 44% of all tested patients). Of the IPG-implanted patients, 71 had urge incontinence, 13 nonobstructive chronic urinary retention, and 7 chronic pelvic pain syndrome. After a median follow-up of 24 mo, SNM was successful in 64 of the 91 IPG-implanted patients (70%) but failed in 27 patients. SNM was continued in 15 of the 27 patients considered failures, because following troubleshooting SNM response improved subjectively and the patients were satisfied. However, improvement in bladder/pain diary variables remained less than 50%. In the other 12 patients both the leads and the IPG were explanted. During the test phase and during/following IPG implantation, 6% (12 of 209) and 11% (10 of 91) adverse event rates and 1% (3 of 209) and 7% (6 of 91) surgical revision rates were reported, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SNM is an effective and safe treatment for refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction. Adverse events are usually transient and can be treated effectively.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Plexo Lombossacral , Transtornos Urinários/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Sistema de Registros , Suíça , Transtornos Urinários/diagnóstico
2.
BJU Int ; 95(6): 838-41, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15794794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate sacral magnetic high-frequency stimulation as a treatment option for patients with non-inflammatory chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS, category IIIB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen men with CPPS IIIB were treated with high-frequency sacral magnetic stimulation, with 10 treatment sessions once a week for 30 min at a frequency of 50 Hz. The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and quality-of-life index were determined before and after treatment. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the stimulation well and 12 of 14 reported agreeable sensations during stimulation. There were no complications; only one patient did not complete the treatment course. The mean (range) total NIH-CPSI score did not change with treatment, at 27 (18-38) before and 27 (4-40) after treatment. Moreover, there was no sustained effect on the mean scores for pain, micturition complaints or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency sacral magnetic stimulation in patients with CPPS IIIB only reduces pain during stimulation, with no sustained relief of symptoms. Therefore, intermittent sacral magnetic stimulation cannot be recommended as a treatment option for CPPS IIIB.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Magnetismo/uso terapêutico , Dor Pélvica/terapia , Prostatite/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Região Sacrococcígea , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA