Review & meta-analysis: isopropanolic black cohosh extract iCR for menopausal symptoms - an update on the evidence.

A systematic literature search revealed 35 clinical studies and one meta-analysis comprising 43,759 women, of which 13,096 were treated with isopropanolic Cimicifuga racemosa extract (iCR). Compared to placebo, iCR was significantly superior for treating neurovegetative and psychological menopausal symptoms, with a standardized mean difference of -0.694 in favor of iCR (p < 0.0001). Effect sizes were larger when higher dosages of iCR as monotherapy or in combination with St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum [HP]) were given (-1.020 and -0.999, respectively), suggesting a dose-dependency. For psychological symptoms, the iCR+HP combination was superior to iCR monotherapy. Efficacy of iCR was comparable to low-dose transdermal estradiol or tibolone. Yet, due to its better tolerability, iCR had a significantly better benefit-risk profile than tibolone. Treatment with iCR/iCR+HP was well tolerated with few minor adverse events, with a frequency comparable to placebo. The clinical data did not reveal any evidence of hepatotoxicity. Hormone levels remained unchanged and estrogen-sensitive tissues (e.g. breast, endometrium) were unaffected by iCR treatment. As benefits clearly outweigh risks, iCR/iCR+HP should be recommended as an evidence-based treatment option for natural climacteric symptoms. With its good safety profile in general and at estrogen-sensitive organs, iCR as a non-hormonal herbal therapy can also be used in patients with hormone-dependent diseases who suffer from iatrogenic climacteric symptoms.

Tolerability of a new fast updosed immunologically enhanced subcutaneous immunotherapy formulation with an optimized allergen to adjuvant ratio under routine practice conditions: a noninterventional observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A fast updosed immunologically enhanced subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) formulation with an optimized allergen to aluminium hydroxide ratio was first introduced in September 2009 in Germany. A large randomized controlled trial showed that the formulation had considerable immunologic effects and good tolerability. In this open-label, uncontrolled, noninterventional study, tolerability was investigated during routine application. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma were treated with pollen and mite allergens using a 5-injection updosing schedule (AVANZ: 300, 600, 3000, 6000 and 15 000 SQ+ units) with weekly intervals, followed by a maintenance schedule with injections of 15,000 SQ+ units.Adverse events (AEs) were recorded by physicians, and symptoms and use of symptomatic medication were analyzed before the start of therapy and after an average 8-month treatment period. RESULTS: SCIT was documented by 362 allergists in 1036 patients between September 2009 and February 2011. AEs mainly consisted of local reactions during updosing (in 24.5% of patients). Systemic reactions were observed during updosing (8.4%) and maintenance therapy (1.7%), the most frequent of which was dyspnea. Overall, tolerability and the effect of treatment were rated as good or very good by 94.9% and 86.6% of patients and by 96.2% and 89.6% of physicians, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label, noninterventional study, fast updosed immunologically enhanced SCIT (AVANZ) was well tolerated in a large group of patients.

Quality of life is improved in breast cancer patients by Standardised Mistletoe Extract PS76A2 during chemotherapy and follow-up: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial.

The objective of this randomised, multicentre, double-blind clinical trial was to investigate the impact of PS76A2, an aqueous mistletoe extract standardised to mistletoe lectins, on quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients. A total of 352 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups receiving PS76A2 (15 ng mistletoe lectin/0.5 ml) or matching placebo twice weekly for 4 to 6 cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) chemotherapy followed by 2 months follow-up. The primary efficacy end-point was the change from baseline of 3 FACT-G subscales (physical, emotional and functional well-being) during the fourth CMF cycle. Secondary measures included GLQ-8 (8 linear analogue self-assessment scales), Spitzer's uniscale and haematological variables. The main variables of safety analysis were adverse events, including injection site reactions and clinical laboratory tests. The results showed that physical, emotional and functional well-being improved upon PS76A2, but deteriorated following placebo. The treatment differences were statistically significant for the 3 subscales as well as for the summary score FACT-G, which was analysed as O'Brien's rank sum of its 3 subscales: The total score increased by 4.40 +/- 11.28, indicating a higher QoL after PS76A2, but decreased by 5.11 +/- 11.77 with placebo (p<0.0001). The GLQ-8 sum of 8 LASA scales was analysed as a summary score of GLQ-5 (sum of item nos. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8) and GLQ-3 (sum of item nos. 2, 3, 4). GLQ-5 characterises typical aspects of QoL, while GLQ-3 consists of 3 side-effects of CMF (feeling sick, numbness or pins and needles, loss of hair). GLQ-5 decreased by 42.9 +/- 125.0 upon PS76A2, indicating an improvement in QoL, but increased by 60.3 +/- 94.0 upon placebo (p<0.0001). GLQ-3 deteriorated in both groups (PS76A2: 13.9 +/- 52.4; placebo: 34.5 +/- 57.0), but the differences in favour of PS76A2 were, nevertheless, statistically significant (p=0.0007). The total score GLQ-8 improved by 28.9 +/- 154.6 after PS76A2 and deteriorated by 94.8 +/- 141.1 after placebo (p<0.0001). Spitzer's uniscale improved by 12.2 +/- 30.7 upon PS76A2 and deteriorated by 10.8 +/- 26.1 with placebo (p<0.0001). After follow-up without chemotherapy, a significant treatment difference in favour of PS76A2 was determined by means of FACT-G, GLQ-8 and Spitzer's uniscale. PS76A2 was well tolerated in this trial, with the exception of slight local reactions in 17.6% of the PS76A2 group. In conclusion, PS76A2 (15 ng mistletoe lectin/0.5 ml twice weekly) was shown to be safe and effective in improving QoL in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy and follow-up.

Efficacy and tolerance of an oral enzyme combination in painful osteoarthritis of the hip. A double-blind, randomised study comparing oral enzymes with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish the non-inferiority of an oral enzyme therapy (Phlogenzym-(PE)) as compared to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac (DC) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. METHODS: Ninety patients presenting with painful episodes of OA of the hip were treated for 6 weeks in one study centre in a phase III, randomised, double blind, parallel group trial. Altogether, 45 patients were treated in the PE group and 45 patients were treated in the DC group. Primary efficacy criteria were: WOMAC dimensions pain, joint stiffness and function, and Lequesne index as multiple endpoint according to O'Brien. The efficacy criteria were analysed applying the test of non-inferiority with regard to mean changes and frequencies, t-test, U test, ANCOVA and descriptive methods. RESULTS: Within the 6 weeks observation period, the adjusted changes from baseline to endpoint of the target parameters worked out as follows (adjusted differences, mean +/- SEM): WOMAC subscale pain (PE -10.3 +/- 1.2, DC -9.5 +/- 1.2), WOMAC subscale joint stiffness (PE -3.9 +/- 0.5, DC -3.6 +/- 0.5), WOMAC subscale physical function (PE -31.7 +/- 3.5, DC -29.7 +/- 3.5), Lequesne's index (PE -2.89 +/- 0.47, DC -2.27 +/- 0.47). Non-inferiority of PE as compared to DC with regard to the O'Brien's global sum of the standardised adjusted changes from baseline to endpoint in pain, stiffness, physical function, and Lequesne's index was established with p = 0.0025. PE was simultaneously non-inferior as compared to DC with regard to the 4 single endpoints: WOMAC subscale pain (p = 0.0033), WOMAC subscale joint stiffness (p = 0.0061), WOMAC subscale physical function (p = 0.0039), Lequesne's index (p = 0.0008) (closed test procedure). The equivalence tests remained insignificant due to comparatively lower effects of DC. For 71.1% of the PE patients and for 61.4% of the DC patients rates of good or very good global investigator assessments of efficacy were calculated (test of non-inferiority: p = 0.0011). In the majority of patients, tolerability was judged in both drug groups as very good or good. CONCLUSION: This trial showed significant non-inferiority from 6 weeks treatment with PE in patients with OA of the hip with regard to the WOMAC dimensions pain, stiffness and physical function, to Lequesne's index, to the investigator and patients assessments of efficacy, and to the responder rates based on pain, physical function, and patient assessment of efficacy. With regard to drug tolerability some tendencies in favour of PE were detected. However, in this study there was no real difference between PE and DC 100 mg/day, implying an equal benefit-risk relation between the substances. PE may well be recommended for the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip with signs of inflammation as indicated by a high pain level.

Efficacy and safety of 6.25 mg t.i.d. feverfew CO2-extract (MIG-99) in migraine prevention--a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study.

The efficacy and tolerability of a CO(2)-extract of feverfew (MIG-99, 6.25 mg t.i.d.) for migraine prevention were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. Patients (N = 170 intention-to-treat; MIG-99, N = 89; placebo, N = 81) suffering from migraine according to International Headache Society criteria were treated for 16 weeks after a 4-week baseline period. The primary endpoint was the average number of migraine attacks per 28 days during the treatment months 2 and 3 compared with baseline. Safety parameters included adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs and physical examination. The migraine frequency decreased from 4.76 by 1.9 attacks per month in the MIG-99 group and by 1.3 attacks in the placebo group (P = 0.0456). Logistic regression of responder rates showed an odds ratio of 3.4 in favour of MIG-99 (P = 0.0049). Adverse events possibly related to study medication were 9/107 (8.4%) with MIG-99 and 11/108 (10.2%) with placebo (P = 0.654). MIG-99 is effective and shows a favourable benefit-risk ratio.

Clinical effects of specific immunotherapy: a two-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a one year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A new depot allergoid of house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus - D.pt) has been created in line with the principles and methodology established in the successful development of pollen allergoids. A two-year double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, with one further follow-up year of active treatment, has been conducted to assess clinical efficacy and tolerance. METHODS: 40 patients (20 verum and 20 placebo) with IgE-mediated mite allergy and a history of moderate to severe perennial symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma participated in a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Actively treated patients were included in a follow-up year. Active treatment was performed with an aluminium hydroxide adsorbed house dust mite allergoid. Parameters for baseline data and clinical efficacy: nasal challenge, quantitative skin prick testing, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), patients' diaries, physician's assessment of patients? health condition, symptoms and use of anti-allergic medication as well as adverse reactions and changes in specific IgG4 and IgE antibodies. RESULTS: The trial detected superiority (p < 0.05) of mite depot allergoid versus placebo with regard to VAS and symptom intensity sum score in patients who needed anti-allergic medication in the baseline period. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between verum and placebo groups were also seen for patients' reactivities to nasal challenges and prick tests with allergen. The blinded assessment by the physician documented a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups in favour of active treatment. After reaching the maximum dose as well as after 12 and 24 months, specific IgG4 antibody concentrations were significantly elevated in the verum group (p < 0.05) by comparison with placebo. Local reactions were less frequent in the verum group and no systemic adverse reactions occurred. A third year of active treatment resulted in further improvement and documented the advantage of booster therapy to stabilize the clinical success. CONCLUSION: Specific immunotherapy with a mite depot allergoid induced significant clinical improvements versus placebo. Safety was assessed as excellent, and no systemic adverse reactions occurred.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-centre study on the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen.

BACKGROUND: Especially in childhood, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) could offer advantages over subcutaneous therapy. However, limited data on its efficacy is available. METHODS: In four German centres 97 children (age 3-14 years) with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind trial comparing SLIT (Pangramin SLIT; ALK-SCHERAX, 0.5 microg major allergens, three times per week, 32 months) with placebo. Primary endpoint was a multiple symptom-medication score for changes in seasonal diary entries between the first and third year of the study (SLIT n=39; placebo n=38). RESULTS: The multiple symptom-medication score was significantly reduced by SLIT to 77.3% of the placebo group (P=0.0498). The subsequent analysis of the single endpoints did not reveal significant differences for symptom scores in favour of SLIT (85.1% of placebo group; P=0.22). However, the medication score improved significantly (67.1% of placebo group; P=0.0025). Furthermore, secondary endpoints assessing in vivo immune responses did not differ significantly between the groups. However, retrospective analysis showed some inhomogeneity for clinical and in vitro parameters at the beginning of the study. Allergic side effects with possible relation to the study drug were reported in both groups (SLIT 49%, placebo 27%, P=0.026). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that SLIT had a positive effect on the reduction of a multiple symptom-medication score, mainly by significantly reducing rescue medication use, but had no significant effect on symptoms alone in children with rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen compared with a placebo.

Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination phytomedicine in the treatment of the common cold (acute viral respiratory tract infection): results of a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: The common cold (acute viral respiratory tract infection) is one of the most frequent diseases in man, world-wide. Clinically relevant efficacy should include early improvement of all symptoms. Results of a clinical trial of a commercially available fixed combination herbal remedy (Radix echinaceae, Radix baptisiae, Herba thujae) are reported here. The aim of this study was to verify clinical efficacy shown in recent studies under (i) good clinical practice (GCP) quality assurance and (ii) common situations at family doctors. METHODS: Patients attending one of 15 study centres (practitioners) as a result of an acute common cold were randomised to the double-blind placebo-controlled study. Three tablets of study medication were applied t.i.d. for 7 to 9 days. Patients daily documented the intensity of 18 cold symptoms, as well as the cold overall, using a 10-point scale and estimated their general well-being using the Welzel-Kohnen colour scales. Additionally, the severity of illness was assessed by the physician on days 4 and 8 (CGI-1). The main and confirmatory outcome measure was expressed as a total efficacy value. This was gauged from the z-standardised AUC values of the primary endpoints (rhinitis score, bronchitis score, CGI-1 and general well-being). Adverse events, overall tolerability, vital signs and laboratory parameters were documented. RESULTS: 263 patients were included. For safety analysis, all patients were used. 259 patients were evaluable for primary efficacy analysis (ITT). Results were confirmed analysing only the 238 valid cases (VCs). The primary efficacy parameters showed the superiority of the herbal remedy over placebo (p < 0.05). Effect size was 20.6% of the standard deviation (90% CI: 0.04-41.1%; ITT) and 23.1% (1.7-44.5%; VC). In relation to the general well-being, the effect size was 33.9% of the standard deviation (12.5-55.3%; VC). Patients who suffered from at least moderate symptom intensity at baseline showed response rates (at least 50% improvement of the global score, day 5) of 55.3% in the herbal remedy group and 27.3% in the placebo group (p = 0.017; NNT = 3.5). In the subgroup of patients who started therapy at an early phase of their cold, the efficacy of the herbal remedy was most prominent (p = 0.014 for the primary efficacy parameter). The therapeutic benefit of the herbal remedy had already occurred on day 2 and reached significance (p < 0.05) on day 4, and continued until the end of the treatment in the totdl score of symptoms, bronchitis score and rhinitis score, as well as in the patients' overall rating of the cold intensity. At that time, equal levels of improvement were reached three days earlier in the verum group than in the placebo group. In 26 patients receiving the herbal remedy and 23 patients receiving placebo, adverse events were reported. Adverse drug reactions were suspected in two patients in the verum group and in four patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the herbal remedy is effective and safe. The therapeutic benefit consists of a rapid onset of improvement of cold symptoms. If patients with colds are able to start the application of the herbal remedy as soon as practical after the occurrence of the initial symptoms, the benefit would be expected to increase (e.g. self-medication).

Tree-pollen allergy is efficiently treated by short-term immunotherapy (STI) with seven preseasonal injections of molecular standardized allergens.

The efficacy and tolerance of short-term immunotherapy (STI) by seven preseasonal injections of tree-pollen allergens (ALK7 Frühblühermischung) was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with 111 rhinoconjunctivitis patients. Nasal and bronchial symptoms simultaneously analyzed, and nasal symptoms as a single end point, but not the overall score of nasal, bronchial, and conjunctival symptoms, showed a significantly lower increase with STI during birch-pollen exposure (both P=0.033, n=105, Mann-Whitney U-test). However, a selective analysis with patients from centers with high recruitment figures (n> or =10 patients, n=29 STI, n=32 placebo) showed a significantly lower increase of nasal, bronchial, and overall symptom score (STI 11.0 vs placebo 18.0, P=0.001, U-test). STI had equidirected effects on conjunctival, nasal, and bronchial symptoms analyzed as multiple end points, although conjunctival symptoms were not significantly different as a single end point. The seasonal increase in drug use was reduced by 62% in the STI group compared with placebo (P=0.032, t-test). Specific IgG4 increased only after STI (P<0.001); IgE was not significantly different. Eosinophil cationic protein remained unchanged with STI, but significantly increased with placebo in the pollen season (P=0.003). STI was well tolerated. In conclusion, STI was shown to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of patients with tree-pollen rhinoconjunctivitis.

Short-term immunotherapy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of molecular standardized grass and rye allergens in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Short-term immunotherapy (STI) can be beneficial for patients who are noncompliant with long-term specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerance of STI with seven preseasonal injections of molecular standardized allergens from grass and rye pollen has been investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study with 87 patients at 12 German University hospitals. METHODS: Symptoms of the eyes, nose, and bronchi and use of symptomatic drugs were documented daily in diaries by patients with allergic rhinitis to grass and/or rye pollen and without bronchial asthma. Patients were monitored by skin prick test titration and measurement of levels of specific IgE and IgG4. RESULTS: The median nasal score for the 10 weeks with the strongest symptoms during the grass pollen season was significantly lower (p = 0.014) with 35.0 for STI (n = 41) versus 69.0 for placebo (n = 40); the overall symptom score was 54.0 for STI versus 97.5 for placebo (p = 0.020). Only STI-treated patients exposed to less than 40 pollen grains per cubic meter per week showed a significantly lower nasal symptom score of 39.0 versus 75.0 for placebo (p = 0.006); these patients also had fewer nasal symptoms and less use of topical nasal drugs (p < 0.001). The threshold dose in skin prick tests was significantly higher, being 9.06 histamine equivalent for skin prick test (HEP) for STI-treated patients who received the maximum dose (n = 22) versus 4.33 HEP for placebo (p = 0.005). Specific IgE levels were significantly higher, being 55.9 SU/ml for STI versus 39.2 SU/ml for placebo after seven injections (p = 0.006) and level of specific IgG4 was 5.36% for STI versus 1.28% for placebo (p < 0.001). No severe systemic reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: STI with seven preseasonal injections with molecular standardized allergens is effective and well tolerated.