Does the CHA2DS2-VASc scale sufficiently predict the risk of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with diagnosed atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants?

The CHA2DS2-VASc scale does not include potential risk factors for left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) formation such as a form of atrial fibrillation (AF) and impaired kidney function. The real risk of thromboembolic complications in AF patients is still unclear as well as an optimal anticoagulant treatment in males with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 and females with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2.The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of the CHA2DS2-VASc scale and other scales to estimate the risk of LAAT formation in AF patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and to assess the prevalence of thrombi in patients at intermediate risk of stroke.The observational study included consecutive patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular AF treated with NOACs, admitted to 3 high-reference institutions between 2013 and 2018. All individuals underwent transoesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion or ablation.Out of 1163 enrolled AF patients (62.1% male, mean age 62 years) the LAAT had been detected in 50 individuals (4.3%). Among patients with LAAT, 1 patient (2.0%) was classified as a low-risk category, 9 (18.0%) were at intermediate-risk, and 40 (80.0%) were at high risk of thromboembolic complications according to CHA2DS2-VASc scale. All patients were treated with NOACs: 51.0% rivaroxaban, 47.1% dabigatran, and 1.9% apixaban.Patients at intermediate stroke-risk with detected LAAT had higher R2CHADS2 score (2.1 ±â€Š1.2 vs 1.2 ±â€Š0.8, P = .007), higher CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score (6.4 ±â€Š4.4 vs 3.7 ±â€Š2.6, P = .027) and more often had an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 56 mL/min/1.73 m (44.4% vs 13.2%, P = .026) compared to patients without LAAT. The receiver operating characteristics revealed that the CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF scale had better predictive ability to distinguish between patients with and without LAAT in the study group than CHA2DS2-VASc (P = .0006), CHADS2 (P = .0006) and R2CHADS2 scale (P = .0140).The CHA2DS2-VASc scale should be supplemented with an assessment of renal function and form of AF to improve stroke risk estimation. The application of additional scales to estimate the risk of LAAT might be especially useful among males with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 and females with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2.

Comparison of different oral anticoagulant regimens in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing ablation or cardioversion.

INTRODUCTION    Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES    The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus and dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), as well as to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with AF treated with different anticoagulant regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS    We studied 1033 consecutive patients with AF, who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before AF ablation or cardioversion. We excluded 174 patients without any prior oral anticoagulation or who underwent bridging with heparin before TEE. RESULTS    In the study group of 859 patients (median age, 61 years; men, 66%), 437 patients (50.9%) received VKAs; 191 (22.2%), dabigatran; 230 (26.8%), rivaroxaban; and 1 patient (0.1%), apixaban. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or the incidence of LAA thrombus (VKAs, 6.9%; NOACs, 5.5%; P = 0.40) and dense SEC (VKAs, 5.3%; NOACs, 3.3%; P = 0.18) between patients on VKAs and those on NOACs. Compared with patients treated with dabigatran, those on rivaroxaban more often had paroxysmal AF, higher ejection fraction, LAA emptying velocity, and platelet count, as well as lower left ventricular end­diastolic dimension and hematocrit. The frequency of LAA thrombus in patients receiving dabigatran and those receiving rivaroxaban was comparable (6.8% vs 4.4%; P = 0.29), while dense SEC occurred more often in patients treated with dabigatran (5.2% vs 1.7%; P = 0.06). In a logistic regression analysis, none of the oral anticoagulation regimens predicted LAA thrombus in TEE, whereas maximal LAA emptying velocity was the only parameter independently associated with the presence of thrombus. CONCLUSIONS    In the studied group of patients with AF, the choice of anticoagulation did not depend on thromboembolic or bleeding risk.