Simple electrophysiological predictor of QRS change induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy: A novel marker of complete left bundle branch block.

BACKGROUND: QRS complex shortening by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been associated with improved outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the absence of QRS duration (QRSd) prolongation by right ventricular mid-septal pacing (RVP) may indicate complete left bundle branch block (cLBBB). METHODS: We prospectively collected 12-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) and intracardiac electrograms during CRT implant procedures. Digital recordings were edited and manually measured. The outcome measure was a change in QRSd induced by CRT (delta CRT). Several outcome predictors were investigated: native QRSd, cLBBB (by using Strauss criteria), interval between the onset of the QRS complex and the local left ventricular electrogram (Q-LV), and a newly proposed index defined by the difference between RVP and native QRSd (delta RVP). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study. Delta RVP was 27 ± 25 ms, and delta CRT was -14 ± 28 ms. Delta CRT correlated with native QRSd (r = -0.65), with the presence of ECG-based cLBBB (r = -0.40), with Q-LV (r = -0.68), and with delta RVP (r = 0.72) (P < .00001 for all correlations). In multivariable analysis, delta CRT was most strongly associated with delta RVP (P < .00001), followed by native QRSd and Q-LV, while ECG-based cLBBB became a nonsignificant factor. CONCLUSION: Baseline QRSd, delta RVP, and LV electrical lead position (Q-LV) represent strong independent predictors of ECG response to CRT. The absence of QRSd prolongation by RVP may serve as an alternative and more specific marker of cLBBB. Delta RVP correlates strongly with the CRT effect on QRSd and outperforms the predictive value of ECG-based cLBBB.

The effect of ICD programming on inappropriate and appropriate ICD Therapies in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy: the MADIT-RIT trial.

INTRODUCTION: The MADIT-RIT trial demonstrated reduction of inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies and mortality by high-rate cut-off and 60-second-delayed VT therapy ICD programming in patients with a primary prophylactic ICD indication. The aim of this analysis was to study effects of MADIT-RIT ICD programming in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: First and total occurrences of both inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies were analyzed by multivariate Cox models in 791 (53%) patients with ischemic and 707 (47%) patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy had similar incidence of first inappropriate (9% and 11%, P = 0.21) and first appropriate ICD therapy (11.6% and 14.1%, P = 0.15). Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy had higher mortality rate (6.1% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.01). MADIT-RIT high-rate cut-off (arm B) and delayed VT therapy ICD programming (arm C) compared with conventional (arm A) ICD programming were associated with a significant risk reduction of first inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR range 0.11-0.34, P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Occurrence of total inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies was significantly reduced by high-rate cut-off ICD programming and delayed VT therapy ICD programming in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. CONCLUSION: High-rate cut-off and delayed VT therapy ICD programming are associated with significant reduction in first and total inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.