Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nervenarzt ; 80(3): 324-8, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19104765

RESUMO

We describe a continuous improvement process in planning, performance, and evaluation of multiple choice examination questions in psychiatry, neurology, psychosomatic medicine, and psychotherapy. We analyzed 640 multiple choice questions of 1,419 students during a period of 4 years. Crucial changes concerned the abolishment of problematic question types, implementation of validated new question formats, extension of case-based questions, elongation of question stems, quantitative evaluation of item difficulty, discriminatory value, and the introduction of a peer review system. Consequences of these improvements were greater item difficulty (average 18%) and discriminatory value (average 67%) and reduced post hoc analysis times. Introduction of peer reviews resulted in longer preparation time, which was however appreciated by the peers due to a clear improvement in item quality.


Assuntos
Neurologia/normas , Psiquiatria/normas , Medicina Psicossomática/normas , Psicoterapia/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Alemanha , Humanos , Neurologia/métodos , Psiquiatria/métodos , Medicina Psicossomática/métodos , Psicoterapia/métodos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA