Minimally important difference in diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from the D-penicillamine study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) in scores for the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in a clinical trial on diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: 134 people participated in a 2-year, double-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing efficacy of low-dose and high-dose D-penicillamine in diffuse SSc. At 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, the investigator was asked to rate the change in the patient's health since entering the study: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, unchanged, slightly improved, moderately improved or markedly improved. Patients who were rated as slightly improved were defined as the minimally changed subgroup and compared with patients rated as moderately or markedly improved. RESULTS: The MID estimates for the mRSS improvement ranged from 3.2 to 5.3 (0.40-0.66 effect size) and for the HAQ-DI from 0.10 to 0.14 (0.15-0.21 effect size). Patients who were rated to improve more than slightly were found to improve by 6.9-14.2 (0.86-1.77 effect size) on the mRSS and 0.21-0.55 (0.32-0.83 effect size) on the HAQ-DI score. CONCLUSION: MID estimates are provided for improvement in the mRSS and HAQ-DI scores, which can help in interpreting clinical trials on patients with SSc and be used for sample size calculation for future clinical trials on diffuse SSc.

The Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire is a predictor and correlate of outcome in the high-dose versus low-dose penicillamine in systemic sclerosis trial.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical implications of a score of > or =1.0 on the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ DI) at the first patient visit, and to examine the implications of improvement in HAQ DI score over 2 years in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. METHODS: SSc skin and visceral involvement was assessed in 134 SSc patients with diffuse scleroderma (mean +/- SD disease duration of 10 +/- 4 months) when they entered a multicenter drug trial and again 2 years later. Mortality and the occurrence of scleroderma renal crisis were assessed for a mean +/- SD of 4.0 +/- 1.1 years. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the relationship of the baseline HAQ DI score to morbidity, mortality, and visceral involvement, as well as the relationship of changes in the HAQ DI score to changes in physical examination, laboratory, and functional variables over 2 years. RESULTS: A baseline HAQ DI score of > or =1.0 was predictive of mortality (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.097-9.468) over 4 years. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that a model which included the erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline (P = 0.005) and changes at 2 years in the swollen joint count (P = 0.002), total skin score (P = 0.005), and white blood cell count (P = 0.005) best explained the change in HAQ DI score over 2 years (R2 = 0.528). The HAQ DI score and total skin score at baseline were highly correlated (correlation coefficient 0.368), as were changes in the HAQ DI score and the total skin score over 2 years (correlation coefficient 0.492). Although the HAQ DI score was heavily influenced by hand dysfunction at baseline and at 2 years, improvement (reduction) in the HAQ DI score over 2 years was related to factors other than hand dysfunction. CONCLUSION: A baseline HAQ DI score of > or =1.0 predicted mortality over 4 years. Improvement in the HAQ DI score in these patients with diffuse scleroderma was associated with improvement in skin thickening, hand function, oral aperture, lung function, signs of arthritis, serum creatinine level, and the investigator's global assessment of improvement. The HAQ DI is a self-administered questionnaire that SSc patients can complete easily and rapidly and that gives the practicing physician important information about prognosis, patient status, and changes in disease course over time.

Skin thickness score as a predictor and correlate of outcome in systemic sclerosis: high-dose versus low-dose penicillamine trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical implications of a skin thickness score > or =20 at first visit and of softening of sclerodermatous skin in a cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. METHODS: Skin and visceral involvement were assessed in 134 SSc patients with diffuse scleroderma (mean +/- SD duration of SSc 10 +/- 4 months) as they entered a multicenter drug trial and again at 2 years of followup. Advent of mortality and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) were assessed during a followup of 4.0 +/- 1.1 years (mean +/- SD). Logistic and linear regression were used to examine the relationship of baseline skin score to morbidity, mortality, and visceral involvement and the relationship of changes in skin score to changes in physical examination, laboratory, and functional variables over 2 years. RESULTS: A baseline skin score > or =20 was associated with heart involvement at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 3.10, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.25-7.70) and was predictive of mortality (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.23-10.55) and SRC (OR 10.00, 95% CI 2.21-45.91) over 4 years. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that a model with skin score at baseline (P = 0.0078) and changes in large joint contractures (P = 0.0072), tender joint counts (P = 0.0119), handspread (P = 0.0242), and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) (P = 0.0244) explained the change in skin score over 2 years (R2 = 0.567). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the investigator's global assessment of improvement was best explained by a model with skin score and HAQ-DI (R2 = 0.455). CONCLUSION: A baseline skin score > or =20 was associated with heart involvement at baseline and predicted mortality and SRC over the subsequent 4 years. Improvement in skin score in these patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma was associated with improvement in hand function, inflammatory indices, joint contractures, arthritis signs, overall functional ability, and the examining investigator's global assessment of improvement.

High-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: analysis of a two-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients taking high-dose D-penicillamine (D-Pen) would have greater softening of skin, lower frequency of renal crisis, and better survival than patients taking low-dose D-Pen. METHODS: Seventeen centers enrolled 134 SSc patients with early (< or =18 months) diffuse cutaneous scleroderma into a 2-year, double-blind, randomized comparison of high-dose D-Pen (750-1,000 mg/day) versus low-dose D-Pen (125 mg every other day). All 134 patients were followed up for a mean+/-SD of 4.0+/-1.1 years to assess the frequencies of new-onset scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) and mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients completed 24 months of drug treatment. The course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score in the 32 high-dose and the 36 low-dose D-Pen completers was not different at 24 months: the skin score dropped 4.8+/-10.3 (mean+/-SD) units in the high-dose group and 6.9+/-8.4 units in the low-dose group (P = 0.384 by t-test; favoring low-dose D-Pen) from 20.4+/-10.3 in the high-dose and 19.9+/-6.6 in the low-dose D-Pen group at study entry. The incidences of SRC and mortality were not different (P > 0.38 by Cox proportional hazards and by chi-square test) in the 66 high-dose patients (8 developed SRC and 8 died) compared with the 68 low-dose patients (10 developed SRC and 12 died). Of the 20 adverse event-related withdrawals, 80% occurred in the high-dose D-Pen group. CONCLUSION: The course of the skin score and the frequencies of SRC and mortality in the high-dose D-Pen group were not different from those in the low-dose D-Pen group. Eighty percent of the adverse event-related withdrawals occurred in the high-dose D-Pen patients. Although this study cannot answer the question of whether low-dose D-Pen is effective, it does suggest that there is no advantage to using D-Pen in doses higher than 125 every other day.

Rational use of calcium-channel antagonists in Raynaud's phenomenon.

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a peripheral circulatory disorder characterized by sudden episodes of digital artery spasm, often precipitated by cold temperature or emotional stress. Although the cause of RP is not fully known, it appears to involve inappropriate adrenergic response to cold stimuli. Treatment of RP is conservative in most patients, but in patients with severe disease includes the use of agents that promote digital vasodilation. The calcium-channel antagonists, particularly the dihydropyridine derivative nifedipine, are the most thoroughly studied drug class for the treatment of RP. Approximately two thirds of patients respond favorably, with significant reductions in the frequency and severity of vasospastic attacks. Nifedipine use is often limited by the appearance of adverse vasodilatory effects such as headache or peripheral edema. The newer second-generation dihydropyridines such as amlodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, and felodipine also appear to be effective in patients with RP and may be associated with fewer adverse effects.

Effect of obesity and feeding on the growth hormone (GH) response to the GH secretagogue L-692,429 in young men.

GH secretion and the response to GH secretagogues are significantly diminished in obese individuals. Previous studies have shown that L-692,429 (L), a nonpeptide mimetic of GH-releasing peptide, selectively stimulates GH release in normal young men and in the elderly, who also have diminished GH secretion. A paired, two-site study examined the effects of L on GH release in 12 healthy obese (part A; mean +/- SD: age, 26.1 +/- 3.3 yr; body mass index, 35.0 +/- 3.1 kg/m2) and 10 nonobese (part B; age, 22.2 +/- 2.3 yr; body mass index, < or = 27.0) young men. In part A, placebo, low dose L (0.2 mg/kg), or high dose L (0.75 mg/kg) was administered iv over 15 min on 3 separate occasions after an overnight fast. Samples for GH, PRL, and cortisol determinations were obtained every 15 min. GH release (mean +/- SE) was significantly increased by both doses of L compared to the effect of placebo: 12.6 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L (low dose), 18.5 +/- 2.7 micrograms/L (high dose), and 0.84 +/- 0.1 microgram/L (placebo), respectively (P < 0.05). In a subset of 6 obese men, in samples collected every 5 min, the GH response to both doses of L was significantly greater than that to 1 microgram/kg GHRH. To compare the response to low dose L in the obese and to determine the effects of feeding on this response, 0.2 mg/kg L was administered as described in part A to nonobese young men after an overnight fast (fasted) or a standardized breakfast (fed; part B). Low dose L was an effective GH secretagogue in nonobese young men; however, this effect was attenuated with feeding [43.6 +/- 7.9 (fasted) vs. 17.7 +/- 4.8 (fed) micrograms/L]. Of note, the response to low dose L in fasted obese individuals was similar to that in fed nonobese individuals. The administration of L was well tolerated in both groups. We conclude that L is an effective GH secretagogue in obese and nonobese young men and may have therapeutic benefits when administered to relative (obese or elderly) or absolute GH-deficient individuals.

Treatment of arthritis with topical capsaicin: a double-blind trial.

The neuropeptide substance P has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammation and pain in arthritis. In this double-blind randomized study, 70 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 31 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received capsaicin (a substance P depletor) or placebo for four weeks. The patients were instructed to apply 0.025% capsaicin cream or its vehicle (placebo) to painful knees four times daily. Pain relief was assessed using visual analog scales for pain and relief, a categorical pain scale, and physicians' global evaluations. Most of the patients continued to receive concomitant arthritis medications. Significantly more relief of pain was reported by the capsaicin-treated patients than the placebo patients throughout the study; after four weeks of capsaicin treatment, RA and OA patients demonstrated mean reductions in pain of 57% and 33%, respectively. These reductions in pain were statistically significant compared with those reported with placebo (P = 0.003 and P = 0.033, respectively). According to the global evaluations, 80% of the capsaicin-treated patients experienced a reduction in pain after two weeks of treatment. Transient burning was felt at the sites of drug application by 23 of the 52 capsaicin-treated patients; two patients withdrew from treatment because of this side effect. It is concluded that capsaicin cream is a safe and effective treatment for arthritis.