Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Pulmonary Hypertension. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) may have impaired exercise capacity and quality of life; this may possibly be due to the early onset of dyspnoea associated with respiratory muscle weakness. Respiratory muscle training could improve the condition of these patients, so this study aimed to determine, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of respiratory muscle training in adult patients with PH. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, clinical trial registries databases, and grey literature and reference lists of reviews related to the objective were searched up to March 2022. Controlled clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of respiratory muscle training with sham or no intervention in adults with PH were included. Records were independently screened by two authors. The primary outcomes were maximal and functional exercise capacity, quality of life, and dyspnoea. The secondary outcomes were respiratory muscle strength, physical activity, lung function, and adverse events. Two authors independently extracted data and the study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 (RoB 2). The certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 5,524 records were screened, and seven randomised clinical trials (RCTs) (257 participants) were included. It was uncertain whether inspiratory muscle training (IMT), compared with sham IMT or no intervention, increased the distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (MD, 39 m; 95% CI, 20.72-57.39; I2=27%; four RCTs; very low certainty of evidence) and slightly decreased the perceived sensation of dyspnoea (MD, 0.5 points on the mMRC scale; 95% CI, -0.87 to -0.13; I2=0%; two RCTs; very low certainty of evidence). In addition, it was uncertain whether IMT had no effect on the emotional (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -1.06 to 0.38; I2=64%; three RCTs; very low certainty of evidence) and physical (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.41 to 0.52; I2=16%; three RCTs; very low certainty of evidence) component of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether IMT increases functional exercise capacity and slightly decreases the sensation of dyspnoea. In addition, it is uncertain whether IMT does not affect the quality of life. More RCTs and with a better methodological design are needed to increase the certainty of the evidence and determine the real effect of this intervention.

Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrostimulation in COPD subjects on mechanical ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation (NMES) in adults with COPD undergoing MV. METHOD: A sensitive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and other resources. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that enrolled adults with COPD on MV due to an exacerbation of their disease were included. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted information, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and the certainty of evidence (GRADE approach) from the included studies. RESULTS: Four RCTs (144 participants) were included. Subjects who underwent NMES were able to move from bed to chair independently in less time (MD = 4.98 days less; 95% CI -8.55 to -1.47; 2 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) and they were fewer days on MV (MD = 2.89 days less; 95% CI -4.58 to -1.21); 3 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) than the control group. However, the effect of NMES on muscle strength is unclear (very low certainty of the evidence). CONCLUSIONS: NMES may improve functional independence and decrease MV time in adults with COPD; however, its effectiveness on muscle strength is uncertain. More and better RCTs are needed to determine with greater certainty the effectiveness of NMES in this population.

Which physical therapy intervention is most effective in reducing secondary lymphoedema associated with breast cancer? Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphoedema associated with breast cancer is caused by an interruption of the lymphatic system, together with factors such as total mastectomy, axillary dissection, positive lymph nodes, radiotherapy, use of taxanes and obesity. Physiotherapy treatment consists of complex decongestive therapy, manual lymphatic drainage and exercises, among other interventions. Currently, there are several systematic review and randomised controlled trials that evaluate the efficacy of these interventions. However, at present, there are no studies that compare the effectiveness of all these physical therapy interventions. The purpose of this study is to determine which physical therapy treatment is most effective in reducing breast cancer-related lymphoedema, improving quality of life and reducing pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched for reports of randomised controlled trials published from database inception to June 2022. We will only include studies that are written in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We will also search grey literature, preprint servers and clinical trial registries. The primary outcomes are reduction of secondary lymphoedema associated with breast cancer, improvements in quality of life and pain reduction. The risk of bias of individual studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool. A network meta-analysis will be performed using a random-effects model. First, pairs will be directly meta-analysed and indirect comparisons will be made between the different physical therapy treatments. The GRADE system will be used to assess the overall quality of the body of evidence associated with the main results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol does not require approval from an ethics committee. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CDR42022323541.

Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrostimulation in COPD subjects on mechanical ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrostimulation (NMES) in adults with COPD undergoing MV. Method: A sensitive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and other resources. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that enrolled adults with COPD on MV due to an exacerbation of their disease were included. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted information, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and the certainty of evidence (GRADE approach) from the included studies. Results: Four RCTs (144 participants) were included. Subjects who underwent NMES were able to move from bed to chair independently in less time (MD = 4.98 days less; 95% CI -8.55 to -1.47; 2 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) and they were fewer days on MV (MD = 2.89 days less; 95% CI -4.58 to -1.21); 3 RCTs; low certainty of the evidence) than the control group. However, the effect of NMES on muscle strength is unclear (very low certainty of the evidence). Conclusions: NMES may improve functional independence and decrease MV time in adults with COPD; however, its effectiveness on muscle strength is uncertain. More and better RCTs are needed to determine with greater certainty the effectiveness of NMES in this population.

Ejercicio: una herramienta clave en la prevención cardiovascular: Consenso de la Sociedad Chilena de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular y de la Sociedad Chilena de Kinesiología en Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular / Excercise, a key intervention in Cardiovascular Prevention: Consensus of the Chilean Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery and the Chilean Society of Kinesiology in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery

This is a Document from de Chilean Society of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, along with the Chilean Society of Physical Therapy of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery.