Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted cardiac electrotherapy devices: a statement from experts of the Polish Medical Society of Radiology, the Polish Society of Cardiology, and the Polish Society of Electroradiology.

The year 2023 marks 60 years since the first pacemaker was implanted in Poland. The number of implantable cardiac electrotherapy devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, cardioverter-defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy systems, has been systematically increasing in the subsequent decades. It is estimated that nearly 500,000 Poles have an implanted cardiac electrotherapy device, making optimal diagnostic imaging with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a clinically and epidemiologically important issue. MRI has become a gold diagnostic standard in many disease states. In this situation, it is believed that 50-70% of patients who have a cardiac electrotherapy device may have indications for an MRI examination later in life. For many years, an implanted cardiac electrotherapy device was considered a definite contraindication to MRI. However, MRI has become possible in most patients with CIED if certain procedures and precautions are followed. In these guidelines, we describe the basic rules that should be followed in order to perform a safe MRI examination in patients with different CIEDs. Despite all the risks and organizational factors described in the text, it seems that for many MRI departments, MRI in patients with CIEDs is achievable and should be implemented immediately. A second important issue is the need for dedicated financial support for these procedures from public health insurance.

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism.

Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) has been applied recently to body contouring. However the mechanism of LLLT-induced reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness has not been elucidated and proposed hypotheses are highly controversial. Non-obese volunteers were subject to 650nm LLLT therapy. Each patient received 6 treatments 2-3 days apart to one side of the abdomen. The contralateral side was left untreated and served as control. Subjects' abdominal adipose tissue thickness was measured by ultrasound imaging at baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment. Our study is to the best of our knowledge, the largest split-abdomen study employing subcutaneous abdominal fat imaging. We could not show a statistically significant reduction of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue by LLLT therapy. Paradoxically when the measurements of the loss of fat thickness on treated side was corrected for change in thickness on non treated side, we have observed that in 8 out of 17 patients LLLT increased adipose tissue thickness. In two patients severe side effect occurred as a result of treatment: one patient developed ulceration within appendectomy scar, the other over the posterior superior iliac spine. The paradoxical net increase in subcutaneous fat thickness observed in some of our patients is a rationale against liquefactive and transitory pore models of LLLT-induced adipose tissue reduction. LLLT devices with laser diode panels applied directly on the skin are not as safe as devices with treatment panels separated from the patient's skin.

[Hydrocolonic sonography in the diagnostics of ulcerative colitis]. / Zastosowanie hydrosonografii w diagnostyce wrzodziejacego zapalenia jelita grubego.

The present study was to assess the diagnostic value of hydrocolonic sonography in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). 32 patients with clinical diagnosis of UC or with the symptoms of the disease were examined with hydrocolonic sonography, and subsequently with double-contrast enema radiography. 18 healthy subjects were examined as controls. Special attention was paid to the bowel wall thickness and stratification, the bowel lumen, haustration and peristaltic activity. Mean colonic wall thickness in UC patients was 2.45 +/- 0.5 mm and it was significantly higher than in the controls (p < 0.001). In UC patients the wall was hypoechoic with usually stratification preserved. Hydrocolonic sonography had sensitivity of 90.6% in the determination of the extent of lesions. Hydrocolonic sonography seems to be a valuable modification of the classic sonography, which enables noninvasive monitoring of the large intestine.