Effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with a poor response to the previously used nucleos(t)ide analogs.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have demonstrated the potency of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients with poor response to other nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study comprising consecutive 40 patients exhibiting a poor response to other NAs, who subsequently received TAF-containing regimens. The primary outcome was the prevalence of virological response (VR) at each time and maintained virological response (MVR) under TAF-containing regimens until week 96. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, the prevalence of MVR was 71.1% (27/38). Further, poor tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) response was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of MVR (p = 0.014). In TDF-naïve patients, the prevalence of MVR was 92.3% (12/13) and 62.5% (5/8) in patients with lamivudine resistance (LAM-r) and entecavir resistance (ETV-r), respectively. Further, viral load and HBeAg status at baseline were associated with a lower prevalence of MVR (p = 0.013). Among the seven patients with prior TDF exposure, 2 patients achieved MVR. Among them, one patient with development of viral breakthrough during TDF/LAM achieved MVR after switching to TAF/ETV. In contrast, one of the five patients with non-MVR had three substitutions (rtS106C, rtD134N/S, and rtL269I) of quadruple mutations in addition to ETV-r. Other patients with rtA181T + rtN236T also could not achieve MVR. CONCLUSION: TAF exhibited high antiviral potency in patients with LAM-r and ETV-r. However, TAF potency was associated with previous TDF response, viral load, and HBeAg status at baseline. Additionally, a quadruple mutation may impact tenofovir resistance; however, further studies are needed to verify this.

Transcatheter arterial chemotherapy using miriplatin-lipiodol suspension with or without embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the anti-tumor and adverse effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy using miriplatin-lipiodol suspension in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, 162 consecutive patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were treated using miriplatin. Of these, 122 patients were treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and 40 were treated by transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, except for prothrombin activity. Assessments were performed 1-3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Objective responses were achieved in 13 patients undergoing transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy and 70 patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (33 versus 57%, P = 0.003). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, objective response was significantly associated with (i) a Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein ≤10% (P = 0.004; risk ratio = 3.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.42-6.70), (ii) no previous transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (P = 0.007; risk ratio = 4.41; 95% confidence interval = 1.49-13.07) and (iii) transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using gelatin sponge 1 mm particles (P = 0.021; risk ratio = 2.97; 95% confidence interval = 1.17-7.49). Fever, anorexia and elevated serum transaminase levels were observed in most patients after miriplatin administration; there were no significant differences in the number of adverse effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the addition of embolizing agents to a treatment regimen using miriplatin-lipiodol suspension can be safely used for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Objective response was achieved in a significantly higher number of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization patients than transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy patients.

Previous chemoembolization response after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) can predict the anti-tumor effect of subsequent TACE with miriplatin in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with miriplatin in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, 122 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC were treated by TACE with miriplatin-lipiodol suspension in our institute. Twenty-two patients (18%) had a solitary nodule and 100 patients (82%) had multiple nodules. Ninety-eight patients (80%) had a history of TACE. RESULTS: Thirty-five of the 122 treated patients (29%) showed complete response (CR). And no serious complications were observed. Patients who had shown CR after previous TACE (pre-CR) were significantly more likely to show CR in the current study compared with patients who had shown less successful responses after previous TACE (56 vs. 20%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that response after previous TACE (pre-CR, risk ratio: 4.76; p = 0.035), tumor multiplicity (solitary, risk ratio: 9.69; p = 0.003), and injection artery (peripheral to segmental hepatic artery, risk ratio: 5.28;p = 0.040) were significant independent predictors associated with CR after TACE using miriplatin. CONCLUSION: In repetition of TACE treatment, switching the TACE agent from epirubicin or cisplatin to miriplatin offered a favorable treatment effect, especially in patients who had shown a CR after previous TACE.

Lipiodol and dye at the site of ablation decreases during RFA.

OBJECTIVES: Intrahepatic metastasis is one of the serious complications of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate how liver tissue could be disseminated during the RFA procedure with different devices and protocols in an in vivo porcine model. METHODS: Three pigs underwent RFA procedures using 2 different devices: needles that could be expanded (LeVeen needle) and those that could not (cool-tip needle). A LeVeen needle was used with a single-step full extension method or a stepwise extension method. Before RFA, a mixture of lipiodol and blue dye was injected intrahepatically into a precoagulated area. After the ablation procedure, the specimen was cut to evaluate the amount of dye remaining in the ablated region and the distribution of the dye outside the ablated area. RESULTS: The stepwise extension method resulted in the disappearance of the smallest amount of the dye and lipiodol at the ablation site, compared with the full extension method and cool-tip needle. Dye was found at sites distant from the ablated area in all cases using the cool-tip needle, but in none with the stepwise extension method. CONCLUSIONS: The stepwise procedure using the expandable needle can reduce tumor cell scattering, which can cause intrahepatic metastasis, compared with other methods.