RESUMO
AIMS: Sulphonylureas promote insulin release by inhibiting pancreatic potassium channels. Older sulphonylureas such as glyburide (glibenclamide), but not newer ones such as gliclazide, antagonize similar channels in myocardium, interfering with the protective effects of ischaemic preconditioning. Whether this imparts a higher risk of adverse cardiac events is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients aged 66 years and older who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2010 while receiving either glyburide or gliclazide. We used a high-dimensional propensity score matching process to ensure similarity of glyburide- and gliclazide-treated patients. The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure. RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, we matched 1690 patients treated with glyburide to 984 patients treated with gliclazide at the time of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. We found no difference in the risk of the composite outcome among patients receiving glyburide (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.18). We found similar results in secondary analyses of each outcome individually, and in two supplementary analyses (haemorrhage and pneumonia) in which we anticipated no difference between the two patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with glyburide is not associated with an increased risk of future adverse cardiovascular events relative to gliclazide, suggesting that the effect of glyburide on ischaemic preconditioning is of little clinical relevance.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Angiopatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Gliclazida/administração & dosagem , Glibureto/administração & dosagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/mortalidade , Angiopatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gliclazida/efeitos adversos , Glibureto/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Precondicionamento Isquêmico , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Miocárdio , Ontário/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: During regular care, women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) rarely receive the recommended screening test for type 2 diabetes, a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in the postpartum period. The current study examined whether the implementation of a reminder system improved screening rates. METHODS: Based on our previous randomized control trial, we implemented a postpartum reminder (letter or phone call) protocol into routine care at two of three clinical sites. We verified postpartum testing by searching hospital laboratory databases and by linking to the provincial physician service claims database. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who underwent an OGTT within 6 months of delivery. RESULTS: Women who received care in a setting using a reminder system were more likely to receive an OGTT within 6 months postpartum (28%) compared with usual care (14%). The OGTT rates for both reminder groups were lower than that found in our randomized control trial (28% vs. 60%). CONCLUSION: Although the screening rates remain low, postpartum reminders doubled screening rates using the recommended test, the OGTT.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Sistemas de Alerta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Glicemia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Gestacional/sangue , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Ontário/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Adulto JovemRESUMO
A single-day large dose of vitamin D (stosstherapy) was given to 42 patients with nutritional vitamin D-deficiency rickets. Stosstherapy is safe and effective, obviates problems with compliance, and, by evoking a response in 4 to 7 days in nutritional rickets, becomes a valuable diagnostic aid for patients in whom initial findings do not clearly distinguish nutritional rickets from familial hypophosphatemic rickets.
Assuntos
Raquitismo/tratamento farmacológico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Cálcio/sangue , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Cápsulas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Ergocalciferóis/administração & dosagem , Ergocalciferóis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Hipocalcemia/etiologia , Hipofosfatemia Familiar/diagnóstico , Hipofosfatemia Familiar/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Fosfatos/sangue , Raquitismo/sangue , Raquitismo/complicações , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Deficiência de Vitamina D/sangue , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To discover the mechanism of hypocalcemia in a patient with the CHARGE (coloboma, heart disease, atresia choanae, retarded growth and development, genital hypoplasia, and ear anomalies) association. RESEARCH DESIGN: Chemical and metabolic studies of serum, urine, stool, and muscle specimens. SETTING: A university hospital affiliated with a municipal hospital. PARTICIPANT: One patient with the CHARGE association and refractory hypocalcemia. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Serum calcium level was 0.91 mmol/L (reference range, 2.20 to 2.58 mmol/L) and serum magnesium level was 0.34 mmol/L (reference range, 0.80 to 1.20 mmol/L) prior to any therapy. After parenteral calcium and magnesium therapy, hypocalcemia persisted (1.46 mmol/L), while the serum magnesium level was 0.84 mmol/L. A needle biopsy of skeletal muscle tissue for the magnesium content confirmed a total magnesium deficiency despite normomagnesemia (muscle magnesium content, 517 micrograms/g [reference range, 800 to 1100 micrograms/g]). Magnesium deficiency was secondary to secretion of magnesium into the gastrointestinal tract (with a daily magnesium intake of 190 mg, a 24-hour nondiarrheal fecal excretion of magnesium was 2019 mg/kg [reference range, < 1000 mg/kg of stool weight]). INTERVENTIONS: Hypocalcemia was corrected only after 7 weeks of continual parenteral magnesium supplements to replenish the tissue magnesium deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the CHARGE association often have hypocalcemia. Magnesium deficiency (with or without hypomagnesemia) is a cause of the hypocalcemia in at least one patient and may prove of significance in others.