RESUMO
An 88-year-old woman with a history of recent complicated pacemaker insertion presented with acute-onset malignant glaucoma recalcitrant to conservative medical therapy. Surgical intervention was discussed; however, given her complex cardiac history and recent postoperative state, the risk of anesthesia-related systemic adverse events was deemed unacceptably high. As such, a slit-lamp procedure was recommended to break the attack of malignant glaucoma. Here within, we report a novel technique of breaking an attack of malignant glaucoma by needling the anterior hyaloid face at the slit lamp. With this technique, a 25-G needle was entered through the pars plana and was advanced through the anterior hyaloid face, zonules, and peripheral iridotomy to create a unicameral eye and successfully break the malignant closure attack.
Assuntos
Agulhamento Seco/métodos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Fechado/cirurgia , Iridectomia/métodos , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Corpo Vítreo/cirurgia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Glaucoma de Ângulo Fechado/diagnóstico por imagem , Glaucoma de Ângulo Fechado/fisiopatologia , Gonioscopia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Microscopia Acústica , Lâmpada de FendaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada. DESIGN: Survey of United States and Canadian medical schools. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-five Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) member institutions were surveyed, along with 30 osteopathic medical schools in the United States and 40 non-AUPO-affiliated allopathic medical schools in the United States. METHODS: A survey characterizing preclinical, clinical, and extracurricular exposures to ophthalmology was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate, presence of, and types of preclinical and clinical exposures. RESULTS: Response rates to the survey were lower from non-AUPO institutions. Preclinical exposures largely consisted of basic lectures and examination skills, and most responding institutions had some sort of required preclinical ophthalmology experience. Clinical exposures were more variable, with an overall rate of required clinical rotations diminishing. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be a gradual erosion of the role of ophthalmic medical education in the standard medical school curriculum. Clearly, there is room for improvement across all types of medical educational institutions.